Dake bwle:
Kothat kota jai, kothat bota pai.
Rajen
----- Original Message -----
From: Manoj Das
To: Priyankoo
Cc: Chan Mahanta ; [email protected] ; barua25
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 3:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario
Dakor bochon..
"manuh more koi, pohu more roi"
On 4/1/07, Priyankoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
There is a news item in today's Pratidin titled "kirip Chakihai mor
byokitok opoman korise".
I am not sure if it helps or not but still I am attaching the news item
here.
Priyankoo
Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta come forward to tell us (1) where he
got the news, (2) who told him, (3 & 4) who made what comment. If he collected
his information from the mysterious " In the March 25 issue of an English
daily" that has been quoted in the "Assam Tribune", we have a right to know the
(5) source of this "English daily".
*** WHO are this WE here? Is it a group of people or is it a royal we
representing HT?
*** I will be pleased to tell how I got word of the news. But FIRST I
need to know WHY I should give it out? What is my obligation to HT on where or
how I get my news? Where does HT or anybody else get that RIGHT to know my
sources? Just for Ht's info, I have a lot of 'swrang-swas' ( secret informers)
who keep me apprised of goings on in Assam, unlike his sources who had no info.
on this now known to be particularly well-known controversy.
NO, I did NOT get my info from the "English daily", as I explained in my
first post. But what does that have to do with anything? So what if I did? And
so what WHEN exactly I got my info?
Finally, let us hear HT explain HOW "Mr. Chandan Mahanta is causing
great harm to Mamoni"? That will be a lot of fun I am certain. Will HT be
wiling to INFORM MRG that I am harming her? That CM is hurting her reputation
by SPREADING this rumor or news? I challenge HT to do so, and see how MRG
reacts to it. BTW,just for HT's info, I happen to know MRG.
>The netters are interested to keep a credible standard of the
assam-net and demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta must reply to the above 5
questions directly.
*** Really? Let HT make me do so. It will be fun to watch.
cxm
At 4:21 PM -0500 3/31/07, Himendra Thakur wrote:
To
Mr. Rajendra Barua
Dear Barua,
I thank you for your advice that "My suggestion will be, if you have
leisure time, please try to do some constructive and creative work like MRG
instead of trying to indulge in such personal attacks ----- "
Your assumption that I am NOT doing any "constructive and creative work
like MRG" is baseless and amounts to a "personal attack", because I am doing a
number of constructive and creative work like MRG, but I don't have to report
that to you. In future, such insinuations will be ignored. I did not ask for
your advice. I am NOT giving you any advice. So, please do not give me any
advice in future.
As for your defense of Mr. Chandan Mahanta that "He was simply asking
questions", I must inform you about an age-old adage that, when a person wishes
to malign someone but does not want to take responsibility, or wants to keep a
back door open through which he would be able to sneak out when confronted, he
presents his malignance in the form of a "question". No wonder you are also
raising another baseless question: "My bigger question is where do you have
such leisure time trying to split hair in the net on a non issue."
It is not a non-issue. IF you "simply fail to see where do you see
Chandan trying ti hurt MRG", that is your problem. To open your eyes, I may
cite an analogy how Erickson &/or Ved Mehta hurt Mahatma Gandhi posthumously by
raising questions & discussions based on lies tabled by N.K. Bose eight years
after the demise of the Mahatma.
I am glad you have said "the news is also published in AT now." It is
clear from the AT March 31 report that "Chaliha clarified that he had never
said such a thing like arrest of the noted writer for maintaining links with
ULFA", whereas Mr. Chandan Mahanta wrote at 9:56 AM on Thursday March 29, 2007
that "I have heard that the Congress MPm from Guahati has recommended that
Mamoni R. Goswami be sent to oprison ..."
By spreading the rumour (which is denied by Mr. Kirip Chaliha in AT),
Mr. Chandan Mahanta is causing great harm to Mamoni.
We demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta come forward to tell us (1) where he
got the news, (2) who told him, (3 & 4) who made what comment. If he collected
his information from the mysterious " In the March 25 issue of an English
daily" that has been quoted in the "Assam Tribune", we have a right to know the
(5) source of this "English daily".
This is not a personal attack.
The netters are interested to keep a credible standard of the assam-net
and demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta must reply to the above 5 questions
directly.
With the best wishes,
Himendra
----- Original Message -----
From: barua25
To: Himendra Thakur ; Gautam Choudhury
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario
Dear Hmenda:
Frankly speaking it looks like you are trying to split the hair on a
non issue.
Chandan wrote:
> I have heard that the Congress MPm from Guahati has recommended that
Mamoni R. Goswami be sent to oprison for serving as an intermediary
between
ULFA and GoI or something to that effect.
>
> Does anyone have any info. on that? I have not seen any mention of
that in
the web version of the English language newspapers.
>
> Would appreciate any help from netters who know.
>
Mr Choudhury also stated that :
Yes, this is true. The comment on Mamoni Raisom Goswami was made by
Kirip Chaliha, MP Guwahati a few days back. In fact, this is a hot topic which
is now being fought between Kirip Chaliha and Arabinda Rajkhowa . Arabinda
Rajkhowa advised to throw Kirip Chaliha into Dustbin as a reaction and the
fighting is going on.
As Ram pointed out, the news is also published in AT now.
From the above, I for one netter will say that I don't see anything
wrong in Chandan's question to the netters.
I donot think Chandan owes anything to the netters. He was simply
asking questions.
I simply fail to see where do you see Chandan trying ti hurt MRG.
We may say, MRG has already elevated herself to the level of 'Odaryo'
one which cannot be burnt by fire.
My bigger question is where do you have such leisure time trying to
split hair in the net on a non issue.
My suggestion will be, if you have leisure time, please try to do
some constructive and creative work like MRG instead of trying to indulge in
such personal attacks which does not help anybody.
I hope you will not take these comments personally.
Thanks
Rajen
----- Original Message -----
From: Himendra Thakur
To: Gautam Choudhury
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario
Dear Choudhury,
This is strange. You wrote "The comment on Mamoni Raisom Goswami
was made by Kirip Chaliha, MP Guwahati a few days back." What did Mr. Kirip
Chaliha say? Mr. Chandan Mahanta wrote at 9:56 AM on Thursday March 29, 2007
that "I have heard that the Congress MPm from Guahati has recommended that
Mamoni R. Goswami be sent to oprison ...." Did Mr. Kirip Chaliha say what Mr.
Chandan Mahanta is saying, or did Mr. Chandan Mahanta made up a part of it?
We demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta come forward to tell us where he
got the news, who told him, at what time. He owes that to assamnet.
Your comment "In fact, this is a hot topic which is now being
fought between Kirip Chaliha and Arabinda Rajkhowa " is confusing because the
persons with whom I talked by telephone have not heard about the so called "hot
topic".
The "hot topic" has not been reported in the printed media who has
a responsibility to verify facts/sources before publication.
I am still concerned that these rumours will hurt Mamoni.
With the best wishes,
Himendra
---- Original Message -----
From: Gautam Choudhury
To: Himendra Thakur
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario
Regards
Gautam Choudhury
----- Original Message ----
From: Himendra Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ram Sarangapani < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, 31 March, 2007 3:56:06 AM
Subject: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario
Dear Ram,
Mr. Chandan Mahanta posted the news at 9:56 AM on Thursday March
29, 2007.
I made frantic telephone calls to India and found that people
were surprised when I asked them about the news.
Mr. Chandan Mahanta wrote at 9:56 AM on Thursday March 29, 2007
that "I have heard that the Congress MPm from Guahati has recommended that
Mamoni R. Goswami be sent to oprison ...."
We demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta come forward to tell us where
he got the news, who told him, at what time. These names and sources are very
important.
All discussions on a hypothetical scenario must be stopped
because these are going to hurt Mamoni.
I hope you will appreciate the concern.
With the best wishes,
Himendra
----- Original Message ---
------------------------------------------------------------------
Here¢s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers
--------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Dex matho eta dharona, thikonar xex xari...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org