Did you ask your inside man (you said very involved in it) whether GOI in Dilli 
forced GOA to seek the services of a Dilli-based planner? Or did GOA select 
this ignorant clueless planner because GOA is clueless in such matters?
  I haven't been to Gurgaon (the name itself reeks of Goo) but my observation 
is that the best laid out plan goes awry in India because there is no adherence 
to the plan after a few years of execution. To Indians, a plan is a piece of 
paper that you throw away after you read it. Unplanned growth around a planned 
area is the norm. Go to Bangalore, you'll see it.
  The question will arise - how do you fix it? I believe staying with a plan 
(short term or long term) takes a lot of discipline and discipline can be 
taught.
  ================================================================= 

Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
        The model of development Medha Patkar refers to is that of the Dilli 
satellites like Gurgaon and those other shiny new towns that are being built to 
house India's new rich.
  

  One needs to be aware of the context and the details before one rushes to 
judgement. It certainly would have helped to know WHAT the new so-called 
Guwahati Master Plan includes, what it is modelled after and why it was 
overwhelmingly rejected.
  

  The Dilli based Planners that Assam Govt ( or whoever it is) hired to do this 
so called Master Plan are quite unfamiliar with Guwahatis and Assam's needs. 
They did NOT even attempt to familiarize themselves with even the most basic of 
the parameters that they were dealing with, before they delivered a plan 
exactly like those Dilli satellites for Assam as well.
  

  How do *I* know?
  

  Because I spoke at length to one of the people from Guwahati who is very 
involved in it, during my last trip to Assam. I was impressed by the fact that 
he was knowledgeable and he cares. I asked him how the Guwahatians are viewing 
it including himself. He said people were reviewing it, and he believed it was 
a TERRIBLE plan. I agreed, on the basis of what he told me then, even though I 
had not seen it myself.
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  At 7:16 AM -0700 6/19/07, Dilip/Dil Deka wrote:
  The shallowness in the thought process of social activist critic Medha Patkar 
is so apparent in the paragraph, "Referring to the proposed creation of three 
more towns to expand the Guwahati metropolitan area, she said that shopping 
malls and highways should not be the yardstick to measure development. The 
development approach should also take into consideration the issues like how 
many people are going to be displaced and how many people are getting their 
livelihood affected by such projects."     Anyone who visited Guwahati in 
recent times knows how congested Guwahati has become. Spreading the population 
to three more urban areas would surely improve the quality of life. Shopping 
malls and highways are not the primary reasons for the new plan, Guwahatians 
know well. As a part of the redistribution of people and enterprise, if such 
facilities are needed, they will definitely emerge as the secondary need.   
Does Ms. Patkar know how to make an omelette without breaking an
 egg?  Dilip Deka  
==================================================================       Past 
WeekPast MonthPast 3 MonthsPast 6 MonthsPast YearSince 2005 Guwahati, Tuesday, 
June 19, 2007  HomeClassifieds Backissues Weather Contact Us  News • City • 
State • North East • Sports • Obituary  Opinion • Editorial • Letters • 
Jocoserious • Photos  Features • Panorama • Mosaic • Horizon • Sunday
  Reading    
---------------------------------
    Corporate houses will own rivers: Patkar
By Ajit Patowary
 GUWAHATI, June 18 – Narmada Bachao Andolan-fame social activist Medha Patkar 
today warned that if the proposed projects for linking the rivers were to be 
materialized, ownership of the rivers would go to the corporate houses. She 
also alleged that the planners of the country had been distorting people’s 
priorities for development planning.  
Patkar, also the convenor of the National Alliance of People’s Movements 
(NAPM), was speaking to The Assam Tribune on the sidelines of the two-day 
national dialogue on environment and sustainable development organized by the 
Krishak Mukti Sangram Samiti in the city since yesterday.

Explaining her assertions, she said that while planning water resources 
projects drinking water should be the first priority. Even in agricultural 
sector, priority should be attached to one crop protection. Wherever there is 
drought, we must provide water for one crop protection. But rules for such 
distributive justice are not formulated.

Many states are changing their water policies to attach higher priority to 
industrial use of water than the use of this resource in agriculture. This is 
why, hydro power is getting the top most priority wherever water resources are 
plenty, she said.

Similarly, though ground water recharge should get the top most priority so far 
as ground water is concerned, we are allowing the water to run away. The 
bottling of water by big capital is also given higher priority and the bottling 
plants are given subsidies. Each of the bottling plants is drawing between 5 
lakh and 25 lakh litres of water per day.

The rivers are also given to the corporate houses. If the interlinking of 
rivers comes true, corporate houses will be given the right over our rivers as 
they will invest for the projects that require an estimated amount of around Rs 
5,60,000 crore, she said.

On the present development activities in the country, she said that much of 
them were based on corruption and misuse of resources. However, she clarified 
that resources should not exclusively mean financial resources and these should 
include also the natural resources.

Natural resources are a kind of capital. This capital is misused in the sense 
that instead of fulfilling the need of the people, it is used to satiate the 
greed of the elite class, which includes the politicians, the bureaucrats, the 
contractors and the corporate houses. Though there are alternative paths to use 
these resources, priorities are distorted, she said.

Later, addressing a press conference at the Guwahati Press Club, she said that 
Government’s development plans in NE region had been adding to the sufferings 
of the region’s people. Not the Armed forces alone, the Government’s plans are 
also creating havoc for the people here, she claimed, even as she demanded 
repeal of the Armed Forces (Special Power) Act.

The people here are opposing the mega dams proposed in the region, as, while 
conceiving them they were not consulted and their informed consent was not 
taken when some of them were implemented. But the projects are pushed ahead, 
she said, adding, the region’s own power demand would be around 7,000 MW at the 
most.

She also suggested that going by the recommendations of the World Commission on 
Dams, water from the catchments should be tapped before its reaching the major 
rivers. This will make mega dams and the river interlinking projects redundant 
if at all the Government has the resolve to save the people from floods, she 
said.

She, however, observed that measures to control flood control and erosion in 
the region had been getting less priority from the state Governments of the 
region and also from the Union Government.

The latest move to conduct a seismic survey in the Brahmaputra riverbed for 
mineral oil exploration betrays further the attitude of the Union Government 
towards the people of the region.

This survey will affect the entire system of the Brahmaputra and also the 
ecology and people of the valley, she said.

While dealing with the natural resources of the NE region there should be a 
holistic approach and this approach should be sensitive to both ecology and the 
human beings, she asserted.

Referring to the proposed creation of three more towns to expand the Guwahati 
metropolitan area, she said that shopping malls and highways should not be the 
yardstick to measure development. The development approach should also take 
into consideration the issues like how many people are going to be displaced 
and how many people are getting their livelihood affected by such projects.  
But the draft master plan for the city has not taken into consideration all 
these issues, she said, adding, displacement had increased by five to ten times 
in the country during the past few years.

Flood and erosion expert Prof D K Mishra also spoke on the occasion.  
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org  


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to