It will be interesting to know who funded this conference? Would Assamwatch 
care to tell us?
  Dilip
  ======================================================

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
    

  

  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 7.33pm
Subject: Report on PNSD Kashmir Conference

  
  
  


  UK Parliamentarians Call for 
  International Intervention in Kashmir
   
  No Solution to Kashmir Conflict Without Kashmiri Self-Determination
   
  The Kashmir Conference hosted by 'Parliamentarians for National 
Self-Determination' (PNSD) held at the Houses of Parliament in Westminster on 
20 June 2007 urged the international community to urgently seek the involvement 
of the people of Kashmir in order to peacefully resolve what remains one of the 
world's most dangerous conflicts, in a democratic manner and in accordance with 
the right of self -determination enshrined in international law. 
   
  Passing a series of Resolutions, the Conference has put down an important 
marker for both India and Pakistan whose leaders will need to reflect on the 
failings of their current bi-lateral dialogue which has aroused international 
concern by excluding the people of Kashmir - the very people whose plight lies 
at the heart of a crisis which threatens the stability of the entire region - 
and who demand to be included as equal partners in the process.
   
  UK Parliamentarians and Kashmiri leaders, including two high profile speakers 
who travelled from the disputed territory, were at one in calling for the 
immediate demilitarisation of Jammu and Kashmir, the cessation of human rights 
abuses and the creation of a process which enables to people of the territory 
to freely determine their destiny so as to remedy an historic injustice which 
has resulted in a tragedy costing tens of thousands of lives.  The Kashmiri 
cause was wholeheartedly backed by Sikh and Naga speakers who called for a 
political alliance which will strengthen the adoption of self-determination as 
a practical and equitable means of conflict resolution in Kashmir as well as 
their respective homelands.
   
  Lord Ahmed, who chaired the Conference, appealed to the UK Government to 
formulate effective policies towards the region and warned that the rights of 
the Kashmiri people can only be truly respected if they were given the choice 
of how they wish to be governed. It is, he said, for them to decide this and 
the role of the international community must be to facilitate that democratic 
outcome. He announced the formation of a PNSD Kashmir Advisory Panel which will 
assist PNSD in taking forward the cause of self-determination in Kashmir.
   
  Fabian Hamilton MP, a member of the influential House of Commons Foreign 
Affairs Committee, stated that a resolution of the Kashmir conflict would be 
top of the agenda when his Committee meets the new UN Secretary General in 
October this year. Kashmiris must have the right to decide their future and 
injustice in the region must end. The international community should ascertain 
their intentions and, whatever they may be, respect them. He cited the UN 
sponsored plebecite in East Timor as an example which offered a precedent.
   
  Sardar Ejaz Afzal Khan, President of Jamaat-e-Islami in Azad Jammu & Kashmir, 
applauded the efforts of PNSD to highlight the Kashmiri cause and fully 
endorsed the Resolutions passed at the event. He said that because  neither the 
British exit plan in 1947 nor the UN Resolutions on Kashmir had been 
implemented there was a total lack of legitimacy in the current status quo 
which has only survived due to state terrorism deployed against a defenceless 
people. He dismissed the ongoing Indo-Pakistan charm offensive as completely 
lacking the ingredients for a solution in Kashmir and suggested that instead 
the international community, including the UN, step in to provide a sensible 
alternative based on the self-determination of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. 
The division of the territory is not, he said, acceptable to Kashmiris and the 
sooner this was recognised the batter.
   
  Brad Adams, Asia Director of Human Rights Watch, highlighted the abuses of 
human rights which continue in the territory, including extra judicial 
killings, disappearances, illegal detention and the use of torture which he 
said was routine. The court system was not partial but instead took political 
directions from the Indian Government. He condemned rights abuses whoever was 
committing them and emphasised that HRW does not adopt any political position 
regarding the conflict. Instead HRW was focussed on ending the ongoing crimes 
against humanity and  war crimes in respect of which he said there must be a 
legal sanction with the guilty being held to account.
   
  Marsha Singh MP spoke of the need to bring the Kashmir issue to the forefront 
of the international agenda, saying that a political solution based on the 
principle of self-determination was the only option available. The use of force 
by states to resolve conflicts was a proven failure and Kashmir is no 
exception. He called on the Indian Government to urgently make a statement of 
its intent as to the core issue and to enter in to a meaningful, unconditional 
dialogue with all Kashmiris. In addition he spoke of the need for the UK 
Government to use its influence to ensure that progress is made towards a 
solution as the world cannot afford the risk of another war between two nuclear 
powers.
   
  Ghulam Mohammad Safi from Indian occupied Kashmir deplored the India's claim 
to Kashmir (included in its constitution) when the UN and the world as a whole 
sees it as "disputed territory". He said Kashmiris want a peaceful settlement 
but this has been made impossible to date due to such intransigent stand and 
due to the systematic abuse of human rights to try to crush a legitimate 
freedom movement. Kashmir is neither an "internal affair " of India, nor a 
bi-lateral matter between India and Pakistan. It is instead about the 
self-determination of the Kashmiri people and that was supported by 
international law. He said Kashmiris had the right to defend themselves against 
aggression and he urged the world powers to intervene in the interests of 
global security as it was no secret that the conflict has the potential to 
destabilise the entire region.
   
  Paul Rowen, MP called for the immediate inclusion of Kashmiris in a 
meaningful manner in the ongoing dialogue between India and Pakistan. Britain 
had a moral responsibility, as the ex-colonial power which had played a role in 
creating the current tragedy, to use its influence to make that happen He 
congratulated PNSD for its work which he said could make an impact on solving 
this and other such conflicts and urged people to work for peace and prosperity 
even if states were not discharging their duties to do so. Having an Irish back 
ground he noted that the Northern Ireland conflict was resolved by talking to 
all parties involved and he lamented that the Kashmiris were currently so 
disenfranchised as a settlement could not happen without their being involved. 
Stuart Jackson, MP said it was necessary for the UN to look very closely at 
India's human rights record and ensure the exercise of self-determination in 
Kashmir which is a cause he supports fully.
   
  Mohammad Ghalib of Tehreek-e-Kashmir urged UK Parliamentarians to take up the 
Kashmir issue as a priority as Kashmiris in the UK were deeply concerned about 
the tragedy in their homeland. Khan Farooq Khan of the JKLF spoke of the urgent 
need to demilitarise Kashmir where the threat of a war involving weapons of 
mass destruction was real. He suggested that this be followed by a ten year 
period of self-rule by Kashmiris which should be followed by a plebecite so 
that the people could freely determine the destiny of the territory without 
outside interference. Nazir Ahmad of the Justice Foundation Kashmir Centre 
condemned the wanton human rights abuses being carried out by Indian security 
forces including the massacre of 35 Sikhs at Chithi Singhpora on 20 March 2000 
who attempted to blame Kashmiris for the atrocity so as to malign their cause 
during the visit of President Bill Clinton. Nazir Qurashi of the World Kashmir 
Freedom Movement thanked the organisers of the event and
 said that self-determination was the birth right of the Kashmiri people and 
the Indian Government must halt its oppression and talk to the people it has 
been tormenting if a solution is to be found; that would inevitably have to be 
a solution based on the consent of the governed.
   
  The Conference also heard from Amrik Singh Sahota, OBE, President of the 
Council of Khalistan who said the Sikh Nation stood shoulder to shoulder with 
the Kashmiri people in their struggle for freedom which has much in common with 
the Sikh struggle for Khalistan. A similar address was delivered by Alung 
Rungsung (on behalf of Isak Swu, Chairman of the National Socialist Council of 
Nagalim) who said that the Naga Nation fully respected the Kashmir right to 
self-determination which they should resolutely pursue even if that means 
confronting any power that seeks to subjugate them. A message was also received 
from Dr Mukul Hazarika of Assam Watch UK which conveyed best wishes to the 
Kashmiri people for whom self-determination was the only credible means of 
bringing peace and prosperity to Kashmir using internationally accepted and 
democratic means of conflict resolution. 
   
  These contributions were warmly appreciated by the many Kashmiris present who 
had travelled from all parts of the UK to attend the Conference. Lord Ahmed 
thanked all those in attendance and pledged that PNSD would continue to advance 
the cause of peace and justice in Kashmir, with the assistance of the PNSD 
Kashmir Advisory Panel. The Resolutions adopted at the Conference are as 
follows:
   
   
  A. This Conference calls on the UK Government, India and Pakistan as well as 
the wider international community to formulate  policies so as to ensure that 
the people of Kashmir be involved in any dialogue concerning a settlement of 
the Kashmir conflict, as an equal partner to with India and Pakistan and for 
the conduct of  a plebecite  so that the people can  approve any outcome, in 
accordance with their right of self-determination in accordance with 
international law. That  plebecite should be  overseen by the UN in order to 
guarantee a free and fair process which reflects the wishes of the Kashmiri 
people. The EU's welcome recognition of self-determination as the basis of any 
settlement in Kashmir is welcomed and the international community's 
responsibility is to now give effect to that principle.

B. This Conference strongly condemns the widespread abuses of human rights in 
Kashmir and  demands that  those guilty of state terrorism be brought to 
account so that the rule of law can be upheld and so that the atmosphere be 
made conducive for a free and fair political process. The international 
community has a moral and legal responsibility to hold those responsible of 
state terror to account and an appropriate court should be established to 
deliver justice.

C. This Conference calls for the immediate cessation of military activity in 
Kashmir and for comprehensive demilitarisation in order to allow democracy and 
human rights to be restored as a matter of urgency.

D. This Conference calls for an international and impartial  investigation in 
to the Chithi Singhpora massacre in which 35 Sikhs were killed by Indian 
security forces who blamed Kashmiri militants (a fact recognised by no less 
than Bill Clinton whose visit was marred by the atrocity) and which was 
followed by several innocent Muslims being killed in fake encounters with the 
Indian forces that claimed  that those were responsible for the original 
atrocity. Neither the Sikhs nor the Kashmiris will accept these heinous 
attempts to divide them and both nations demand that the guilty are punished.

E. This Conference expresses support for all those nations who are being 
oppressed by India, such as the Kashmiris, Sikhs, Nagas, Assamese and others. 
India's refusal to recognise the right of self-determination of these nations 
and its resort to the use of force to prevent them exercising that right has 
involved genocide and the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives. These nations 
must be allowed to pursue their legitimate aspirations of freedom and security 
in their respective homelands. India should not be allowed a permanent seat at 
the UN Security Council until it complies with its international obligations 
relating to human rights, of which self-determination has been recognised by 
the UN itself to be the most basic human right.

F. This Conference calls for a meeting between the PNSD Kashmir Advisory Panel, 
announced today, and the UK Foreign Office to discuss UK policy in relation to 
Kashmir and the settlement of the conflict and the punishment of those 
responsible for systematic and massive human rights abuses.
   
   
  Ranjit Srai,
  Administrative Secretary,
  Parliamentarians for National Self-Determination
    
---------------------------------
  Get a FREE AOL Email account with 2GB of storage. Plus, share and store 
photos and experience exclusively recorded live music Sessions from your 
favourite artists. Click Here for more information.




_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to