Ram -
How can I thank you more!
You are so sensitive--and your memory!!!
BR
mm


Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:30:00 -0600From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]: Re: [Assam] article from outlookindia.com- Indian Education 
rote-tonCC: [email protected]
Dear Mukul da,
 
You did wake up some far away memories. This is verse from John Bunyan's Little 
Sheperd Boy. I vaguely remembered a few lines, for the rest Google helped out. 
Here is the the complete verse:
 
(Interesting;y enough, the Bible refers to humility in a number of places - 
both James and Luke make quite a few references on a similar theme, and so does 
our Gita)
 




HE that is down needs fear no fall,
 

  He that is low, no pride;
 

He that is humble ever shall
 

  Have God to be his guide.
 

 

I am content with what I have,
         5

  Little be it or much:
 

And, Lord, contentment still I crave,
 

  Because Thou savest such.
 

 

Fullness to such a burden is
 

  That go on pilgrimage:
  10

Here little, and hereafter bliss,
 

  Is best from age to age.
 




 --Ram 
On 6/23/07, mc mahant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

Dear Ram, Shall appreciate if you can mail the full short verse  "He that is 
low                                                                       Needs 
fear no fall                                                                    
   -------------                                                                
            He that is humble                                                   
                        --------------                                          
                                  Shall have God to be his Guide." I searched a 
lot but nobody seems to remember this simple one.Thanksmm 


Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:07:49 -0600From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [Assam] article from outlookindia.com - 
Indian Education rote-ton 

Umesh,
 
Too many people and too many times relegate rote learning to the dogs.
 
Even today, I can "vomit" out the  Psalm of Life by Longfellow for the most 
part or even some passages from Shakespeare, Robert Browning, Keats or Shaw. 
(and I wasn't a literature major). 
And, I am not trying to show off here - I think there are many with that same 
Indian education who can do the same or better than I.
 
When I was forced to do the rote learning both at St. Edmunds and even at Don 
Bosco, Guwahati, I barely understood what these passges meant and hated those 
classes. The same went for history or Gandhian struggle etc. 
 
The question is if these important or valuable? Or who cares?
IMHO - literature and other "impractical" studies make our education wholesome. 
I think, all subject areas are important. The methods of learning may be 
different, and some may be better than others - as for me rote learning and the 
mastor with the stick made all the difference whether or not I learned. 
 
--Ram da
 
 
 
On 6/22/07, umesh sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
Ram-da,I agree with you partially. We do need rote memorization fr many things 
-- like learning new vocabulary words (ofcourse, you can improve your knowledge 
of these by different techniques - such as using them in own words, match the 
following, flash cards - etc --- but it all amounts to rote ). We all learn a 
language by rote (and practice) - same with  terms of history, biology etc. 
Ofcourse, the more you use these terms the better you get at remembering them. 
Further, most Indian students have more practical experience than most in USA - 
atleast till they are teenagers. Tom Sawyer style of "adventurous learning" is 
no longer possible in USA - since no student/child (below age 14) can go 
anywhere without escort. Further, most  gardening, plumbing, auto 
repair/maintenance , cleaning is now done by hired staf in USA - so no 
practical learning about electricity and electrical and mechanical appliances. 
Ofcourse, beyond the basic knowledge thru rote - one must learn to apply the 
knowledge in various situations - in which Indian student lack - mostly. Some 
intelliegent ones are able to put two and two together and get by - or go 
abroad. That is street smartness - as the auhor wrote in his best seller book 
"What they don't teach at Harvard Business Schoo" - a required reading at HBS 
itself.UmeshRam Sarangapani < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

C'da,
 
Thanks for forwarding this rather well-written article. I must say, it makes 
wonderful reading and does make one have second thoughts about the quality of 
education that most of us have received from India. :)
 
Even with that didactic//memorizing by rote background, I came away with a few 
of things here: :)
 
The first, of course, is that people can be taught (often complex things) even 
if they have had no formal education. 
 
The second, of course, is that, I find it a tad preposterous, that Dunu Roy 
thinks that education in India as "Instead, we have didactic instruction, 
memorising by rote, and vomiting out useless information for futile 
examinations... "
 
The third, of course, is that according to Dunu Roy, the Govt. is pretty 
useless, ie. whatever they touched (his illustrations here) have been baseless, 
miscalculated, and ultimately, Roy and his group, had to go teach the 
"practical/down-to-earth" stuff to the affected people, and make the 
corrections. 
 
I have no argument  with the first point - I do think it is highly possible to 
teach people to perform and operate complex procedures, if they are willing to 
learn and taught well.
 
The notion that education in India is totally impractical I find it had to 
believe. You, me, and most NRIs have had this didactic education (including 
Roy). I really wonder, how, Roy & his group of intellectuals managed to get out 
of that mold? 
 
Most Indians too have this background too. Then, how is it that they manage to 
do very well in this country? How is it that they have not only done well in 
school in this country, but have proved to be one of the smartest in opening up 
successful start-ups (not just IT), and doing great. 
I don't know. Probably  Roy will tell us.
 
On the third point, it is quite easy to take pot shots at the Govt. machinery. 
and its incompetence. While I commend Roy and his group (are they some anti-dam 
people:) in taking the trouble to do a better job teaching than the education 
system, I wonder, if Roy can recommend that method for the whole country, and 
if that will be workable. 
 
--Ram
 
 
 
 
On 6/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
Knowledge As Weapon Ordinary working people have the capacity to learn, to 
collect information, to look at it analytically, and eventually use it for 
bettering their own lives. This is, or should be, the central objective of 
"education". Instead, we have didactic instruction, memorising by rote, and 
vomiting out useless information for futile examinations... Dunu Roy
It was some 30 years ago, in the mid-70s, that we got a glimpse of what the 
future might hold. We had just purchased 2 acres of land to build a workshop 
on, in the district of Shahdol in Madhya Pradesh. There had been some argument 
with the neighbouring owner about where exactly the boundary lay. So one day we 
dragged out the iron chain that surveyors use, and began measuring the land 
ourselves. A curious shepherd boy must have witnessed the proceedings, because 
next day a delegation of solemn farmers from the nearby village paid us a 
visit. They had heard that we were engineers, they explained, so could we teach 
them how to measure land? Why, we asked, whatever will you do with it? Well, 
they explained, the patwari (the government revenue functionary at the village) 
had been demarcating their lands and they were never sure whether he was doing 
it right. So we spent the next four hours demonstrating how the chain worked 
and how to calculate the area. In the process, of course, we began to learn 
that the chain was called a jareeb, the area was rakba, the khasra number 
referred to the record in the revenue department, their title was the patta, 
and the patwari presided over a khatauni in which all secrets were well 
documented.  
A week later, the same delegation was back, but looking less solemn and more 
brashly conspiratorial. Could they borrow our jareeb? We handed over the chain 
and then, not a little puzzled ourselves, we followed them at a discreet 
distance. In due course, we arrived at the village and a curious spectacle 
greeted us. On the farms of the village, the patwari was laying out his chain, 
and wherever he went, the farmers followed with their borrowed jareeb and laid 
it out in exactly the same manner. At every halt they would watch the patwari 
and when he began to enter figures in his notebook, they too would whip out a 
pencil and scribble on a piece of paper. Rarely had we seen a more harassed 
looking patwari! At the end of the day, the delegation was back again, beaming 
from ear to ear. Thank you for the hathiyaar (weapon), they told us, and handed 
back the jareeb. Can we, we asked them, see what you wrote? They took out their 
smudged piece of paper and showed it to us. It was covered with a series of 
numbers in meaningless disorder. But, they grinned, they had taken care not to 
show it to the patwari! This theme of knowledge as weapon has come back to us 
many times in the last three decades. In the mid-80s, a small party from the 
Palamau district of Bihar knocked on our door. Could we come to their village 
and see what the proposed dam on the Auranga river was going to do to their 
area? We said yes, but provided they were able to wrangle a copy of the DPR 
(Detailed Project Report) of the dam. Oh, no problem, they remarked, the 
irrigation department chaprasi (peon) was from their village. So, three weeks 
later, we were rambling across the farmlands of Palamau inspecting the river 
and its catchment and comparing it to what was written in the DPR. We were 
faced with a battery of questions. Look at that river, exclaimed the villagers, 
do you think it can carry as much water as to irrigate all the lands the 
department is claiming it will? And can you see the silt in it; how long will 
it take for the dam to fill up? The department says that this village will come 
under submergence, and that one will not, when we can clearly see that this 
village is higher than that one! How can we challenge their views?  We took 
four days to instruct a batch of 20 young boys from the surrounding villages 
how to measure the flow in the river, the silt load that it carried, and the 
slope of the land.With that, they said, they would be able to take on the 
project's claims of projected irrigation, the life of the dam, and the extent 
of submergence. On the last evening, as we were packing to leave the next 
morning, they eyed us suspiciously. Where, they asked, pointing to the "dumpy" 
(a kind of telescopic instrument that is used to measure levels), are you 
taking that? Well, we said, this is our instrument and we are taking it back; 
if you want one you will have to get it for yourselves. How much does it cost, 
they queried, and where is it available? The nearest place, we explained, would 
be Ranchi and it would cost about Rs 3000. And then we retired for the night. 
Only to be woken up by an exuberant hammering on the door very early the next 
morning. Here, they said, is Rs 3000 collected from donations by all the 
villagers, and you can go and buy the dumpy yourself; otherwise how will we 
fight a yuddh (war) without an astra (weapon)? That the yuddh was joined became 
clear to us when, four months later, a parcel arrived with the postman. It 
contained a sheaf of papers containing the records of three months of daily 
measurement. We went to work on the data and came up with some very interesting 
findings indeed. The river, for instance, carried only half as much water in 
the monsoon months as the DPR claimed it did. This water also bore a silt load 
one-and-a-half times that of the figure reported in the project proposal. 25 
villages were actually coming into the submergence zone, demarcated by 
following the full reservoir contour, as compared to the 19 acknowledged by the 
project authorities. When all these were factored into the calculations the 
benefits actually came to less than the costs! This was going to be one very 
unviable dam indeed, we informed the people of Auranga. They, in turn, took the 
report and propagated it all over the area through posters and leaflets, while 
the English version was duly sent off to the governments, the media, the 
courts, and even the World Bank. Today, fifteen years later, the Auranga river 
remains unbound.  In the mid-90s, we had another set of visitors, but this time 
from the high ranges of Kullu district in Himachal Pradesh. Their villages and 
hamlets were being threatened by the declaration of the Great Himalayan 
National Park. What exactly was this Park, they asked, and how could they 
protect their families? So, two months later, armed with the relevant documents 
and reports, we pitched camp in their village. A young bunch of grazers and 
farmers listened attentively as we explained how the government had 
commissioned a study in the 80s and how this study, conducted by a pair of 
specialists from the Pheasant Society in the UK and Canada, had come to the 
conclusion that only by declaring the Park as a protected area could the rare 
Western Himalayan Tragopan (a ground-dwelling bird) be saved. And then, as we 
presented the details of the study, the listeners grew restive. No, they 
protested, it is not possible for the Tragopan to be disturbed by our herds 
because it nests in late winter and our grazers go up only in late spring. Even 
that figure of 25,000 animals is wrong, they objected, our numbers rarely cross 
12,000. And it is not us who destroy the herbs, but the Nepali labourers from 
the Terai, who are unfamiliar with alpine ecology and are hired by the traders 
in the plains.  We suggested to them then that they should do their own study 
and compare their findings with what had been reported by the foreign experts. 
Very well, they responded immediately, tell us how to do the study. So, for the 
next two days, we demonstrated to them how to draw transects and conduct animal 
counts, how to document the diversity of grasses and shrubs, and how to 
systematically record their observations.As soon as the snows melted, six of 
them headed towards the alpine meadows, following the same route that the 
scientists had taken ten years earlier. Two porters who had been taken along to 
ferry the supplies to base camp (at heights of over 3000 metres, one does not 
run into the occasional tea shop or restaurant!), became so familiar with the 
routines of measurement that they eventually became part of the study team. Six 
weeks later they returned, armed with a range of documented observations. A 
detailed examination of their records showed that they had successfully 
challenged every one of the findings of the government-sponsored study. In 
addition, their measurements indicated what was the carrying capacity of the 
meadows, how ruminants were in fact controlling weed infestation, and how the 
herbs could be harvested within the boundaries of conservation.  This much, 
then, is certain: people fight their struggles for survival based on what 
knowledge they can create. Each one of the reports and studies cited above (and 
numerous others that have not been documented in both rural and urban areas) 
indicates that ordinary working people have the capacity to learn, to collect 
information, to look at it analytically, and eventually use it for bettering 
their own lives. This is, or should be, the central objective of "education". 
And yet, these are simple (and yet very complex) tasks that are not undertaken 
by our educational institutions. Didactic instruction, memorising by rote, and 
vomiting out useless information for futile examinations constitute the 
fundamentals of what passes for education in our schools and colleges. Perhaps 
there is a purpose to it all. Perhaps another Macaulay is required to explain 
it to us in yet another Minute. And perhaps, in some not too distant future, a 
group of young labourers will learn to document their own lives to tear this 
farce to pieces. 


A graduate (and post-graduate) from IIT Bombay, Dunu Roy heads Hazard Centre in 
New Delhi.

# You may be missing other accompanying blurbs, related stories, graphics 
etc.Link to this story as it appears on the site :- Knowledge As 
Weaponwww.outlookindia.com 

MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "203.200.89.96" claiming 
to be Subscribe Online: Outlook 
Magazine_______________________________________________assam mailing [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org 
_______________________________________________assam mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.orgUmesh SharmaWashington 
D.C. 1-202-215-4328 [Cell]Ed.M. - International Education PolicyHarvard 
Graduate School of Education,Harvard University,Class of 
2005http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu info)http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ 
(Management Info)www.gse.harvard.edu/iep (where the above 2 are used 
)http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/ 

Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for 
your free account today. 


Sign in and get updated with all the action! Formula One
_________________________________________________________________
Catch the cricket action with MSN!
http://content.msn.co.in/Sports/Cricket/Default.aspx
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to