The flow of human beings from the plains of Bengal (including Bangladesh) to Assam is and has always been driven by differences in economic opportunities except possibly the middle class Hindus who moved after 1947.
[Even in the latter case, it is not clear that all of the migration to Assam is driven by the fear of political persecution - for after all, poor Hindus (not babus) from these areas had moved into Assam throughout 20th century.] The differences in economic opportunities arise mainly from differences in availability of natural resources per person (land, fishing water, forests) and from differences in availability and the degree of access to common property and state owned resources. These differences in economic opportunities are dying out for obvious reasons - except possibly in tribal/hill areas of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland etc where natural resources are still up for grabs. [Sanjib Baruah has written very authoritatively on the historical process related to some of these issues.] Migration should then cease after a period of time. As for politicians encouraging migration and the existence of corruption in state agencies that legitimise illegal migration - these should seen as mere exploitation of the fact that migrants want to move in search of economic opportnuities. The migrant is willing to pay with money and vote for the right to live here - there is a market - the politicians and the bureaucrats will be suppliers in this market. Nothing that one can think of can prevent this. And then all this talk about Bangladeshi versus Indian migration. If Bongals had not filled up the land, the vacuum created by the wedge between per capita resource availability in Assam and rest of "Bharat" would have meant a huge migration of people from mainland India. Counterfactual history is always dangerous. But think about it for a moment. If walls of fire were erected to prevent people from coming to Assam from East Pakistan and Bangladesh in 1947, the Indian constitution would not have defended the state from potential migration that the economic mechanism would have engineered instead from mainland India. The pace would be different. The fact that the poor arid regions of central and eastern India do not have the skills to exploit wet areas would have been a factor. In the long run, however, the socio-economic picture would probably not be very different. The faces would have looked different. Less of lungis, less Bengali, more Hindi, more Hindu possibly. Then, what remains of the 1979 agitation? Perhaps, an awareness of the reality that just won't go away. A gnawing feeling in the indigenous soul that something has changed, something has been lost - realized in hard facts. For the urban dwellers, the veils have been lifted. And as the last thirt years have taught, the change is irretrievable. The politics of camouflage has been replaced by the politics of ethnic polarization. The middle class has learnt that language. Even the oxomiya bhdralok has. Santanu. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of xourov pathok Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:17 AM To: [email protected]; Dilip/Dil Deka Subject: [Assam] Who is the Sentinel of Freedom? > I can see you are trying to steer the discussion > to the same issues that you are so fond of and > have discussed here so many times - that India has > totally failed and Assam will be better off by > opting out of India. dilip-da, that is c-da, not me. could you show me where i have argued assam is better off opting out of india? the possibility of that happening is too remote, imho, and there is not point in speculating on it. it is not going to happen. period. i am trying to keep to the issue of immigration, and not going on a tangent on freedom. independence. principles. or thought experiments. i am trying to focus on the failure of the assam agitation and what it means for assam. also, i am trying to focus on the mechanism how immigration is happening. what sustains it. etc. > On your email below - All of your allegations are > valid, not always but in many instances. India is > still experimenting with democracy [snipped] i am not interested in the discussion on indian democracy in the present context. i am strongly interested in the issue of democracy, of course. but that is an entirely different issue. x ________________________________________________________________________ ____________ Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
