NETTERS  can now GET A CLEARER PICTURE.
NEVER WORRY. 
SOVEREIGN ASSAM  WILL CONVERT ALL CRISIS TO WINDFALL PROFITS.
MM


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:34:41 
+0600Subject: [WaterWatch] Is India a victim of its own policy?




Is India a victim of its own policy?Harun ur Rashid, The Daily Star, August 14, 
2007http://www.thedailystar.net/2007/08/14/d70814020334.htmUnilateral water 
diversion, or withdrawal of water from internationalor common rivers, has been 
the long-standing policy of India. Indiabothered little about the concerns of a 
lower riparian country, suchas Bangladesh, in diverting water from common 
rivers.In 1896, the "Harmon Doctrine" was propounded by the US AttorneyGeneral 
Judson Harmon, claiming that Mexico was not entitled to thewater from an 
international river, the Rio Grande.The doctrine emphasised territorial 
sovereignty over an internationalriver. It means that, within its territory, a 
state can do whatever itwishes with the water of an international river, and 
does not need tobother about the consequences of its withdrawal on a lower 
ripariannation.India argued in favour of the Harmon Doctrine in the mid-70s 
withBangladesh (I was Director General of South Asia), though the USitself had 
discarded and discredited it in 1906 when it concluded atreaty with Mexico 
relating to sharing of water of the Rio Grande.When India argued the relevance 
of the Harmon Doctrine in the '70s,Bangladesh counter-argued that the "Helsinki 
Principles", which wouldentitle a co-riparian of a reasonable and equitable 
share of water ofan international/common river or drainage basin, had replaced 
it in1966.Use of river waterThe use of river water is of two types -- 
non-consumptive andconsumptive. Navigation is a non-consumptive use of water 
becauseriver water is not depleted or reduced through navigation. 
Consumptiveuse of water consists of withdrawing water for agricultural and 
otherpurposes. Consumptive use always reduces the water in rivers.A river knows 
no political boundaries between countries. It flows asan indivisible unit, and 
if it is interfered with at the upper stream,the lower riparian country will be 
affected. That is why internationallaw recognizes the right of each riparian 
country to enjoy all theadvantages deriving from river waters for the welfare 
and economicprosperity of its people.At least 56 rivers flow from India into 
Bangladesh. The largest ofthem, the Ganges, the Brahmaputra and the Meghna 
(GBM), flow throughBangladesh until they meet the Bay of Bengal, creating one 
of thebiggest deltas in the world. It is estimated that 25,000 square 
mileswithin Bangladesh can be designated as a delta, an area equal toBelgium 
and the Netherlands together.Bangladesh is a land of rivers, and swimming has 
been the birth-rightof all Bangladeshi children. Rivers have been the lifeline 
of thepeople of Bangladesh, although in the monsoon season they often 
causefloods. Without monsoon rain and the rivers, Bangladesh's environment,and 
its cultural tradition, music, and folk tales based on rivers,will 
die.Agriculture is the backbone of the country, and 76% of the people livein 
villages. Water plays the most vital role in the country's economy.85% percent 
of the water comes from the Ganges and the Brahmaputraduring the dry season 
(November to May).Millions of people are directly or indirectly dependent on 
river waterfor their livelihood. Water is vital for agriculture, fishery, and 
theflora and fauna, and constitutes an indivisible part of 
people'slives.Depletion of water in rivers puts Bangladesh in a very 
criticalsituation, especially in navigation, agriculture, and way of 
life.Farmers, fishermen, and the forests, are all adversely affected 
bydepletion of water in rivers.Water dispute and BangladeshThe unilateral 
withdrawal of water from the upper reaches by India hasbeen a concern for 
Bangladesh. If India withdraws water heavily fromcommon or international 
rivers, such as the Ganges and theBrahmaputra, there will be less available in 
Bangladesh. This isobvious.The water dispute with India has been going on since 
the birth ofBangladesh. It started with India's ill-conceived Farakka Barrage 
onthe Ganges (11 miles from Bangladesh's border), for diverting waterfrom the 
Hoogly river for flushing silt, not for agriculture.India's pre-occupation has 
been how to divert water from common riverswithout sharing information, or 
consulting, with Bangladesh. Forexample, information regarding the storage of 
water of the Barakriver, by building the 1,500 MW Tipaimukh hydroelectric dam, 
has yetto be shared with Bangladesh.India has embarked on constructing dams on, 
and diverting water from,many common rivers, such as the Teesta, the Gumti, and 
the Khowai,without any agreement with Bangladesh. India had reportedly 
blocked-ofstreams (such as Muhuri, Chagalnaiya, Fulchari, Kachua and 
manyothers) flowing into Bangladesh from Tripura. As a result, as of 1979,eight 
chars (islets) were detected in the tributaries of Muhuri andKahua, and they 
have blocked water flow in Bangladesh.Since these rivers are in India, it did 
not care to discuss, consult,or come to an agreement with Bangladesh on the 
blockage or diversionor consumptive use of the water, although a Joint River 
Commission hadbeen formed in 1972.China's proposed diversion of waterAccording 
to a report by an Indian writer, China is attempting to damor redirect the 
southward flow of water from the Tibetan plateau, thestarting point of many 
rivers, such as the Indus, the Mekong, theYangtze, the Yellow, the Salween, the 
Brahmaputra, the Karnali and theSutlej.According to the same writer, China's 
intensive farming needs water,and it is increasingly turning its attention to 
the water reserves ofthe Tibetan plateau. China is presently toying with 
massiveinter-basin and inter-river water transfer projects.Furthermore, several 
Chinese projects in west-central Tibet have abearing on river-water flow into 
India, but China refuses to shareinformation with India. The same tactics India 
adopted with Bangladeshare now likely to bite India.The writer also pointed out 
two Chinese projects that might affectIndia adversely. One is the proposed 
Great South-North Water Transferproject for diverting Tibetan water, and the 
first phase calls forbuilding 300-kilometres of tunnels and channels to draw 
water from theJingsha, the Yalong and the Dadu rivers on the eastern rim of 
theTibetan plateau.The second phase of the project is more damaging, because it 
proposesto re-route the Brahmaputra river northward. In fact, the writerpoints 
out that China has identified the bend where the Brahmaputraenters India.India 
does not seem to have considered that the Chinese water expertsand hydrologists 
may have acquired the technology by which the Tibetanplateau waters could be 
re-routed northward towards China.Now India has woken up. China is reportedly 
doing the same thing thatIndia did with its rivers in relation to Bangladesh. 
China does notfind it necessary to consult, discuss, and sit down with India 
aboutthe proposed diversion of waters from the Tibetan Plateau. Therecannot be 
one rule for India and China, and another for India andBangladesh.There is 
another, wider, dimension on availability of fresh water. Theincreased demand 
for fresh water has prompted the construction of damsand barrages on 
international rivers, and it is reported that 60% ofthe world's largest rivers 
have been interrupted by the artificialstructures. Many of them were built in 
agreement with ripariancountries, and about 200 treaties are now in force for 
the managementof common water resources.Fresh water is getting scarce according 
to a Unesco study. The averagesupply of water is expected to drop by one-third 
within 20 years.Unesco points out that up to 7 billion people could face 
watershortages by 2020, and global warming may cause severe water shortagesin 
50 countries. South Asia is one of the regions to be adverselyaffected, partly 
because of melting of the Himalayan glaciers due toglobal warming.Water experts 
believe that water disputes on intra-state andinter-state level may increase in 
future. It is the potentialinter-state conflict over river water resources that 
may be of greaterconcern.Barrister Harun ur Rashid is former Bangladesh 
Ambassador to the UN, Geneva.-- zakir kibriaExecutive Director, BanglaPraxisand 
Co-ordinator, Solidarity Workshop__._,_.___ 
Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic 
Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Calendar 

 Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: 
Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group 
| Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe 


Recent Activity


 10
New MembersVisit Your Group 
SPONSORED LINKS


South asia
South east asia
Waterwatch
Fresh water
Three gorges dam


Yahoo! Finance
It's Now Personal
Guides, news,
advice & more.

Y! Messenger
Send pics quick
Share photos while
you IM friends.

Yahoo! Groups
Be a Better Planet
Share with others
Help the Planet.
. __,_._,___ 


_________________________________________________________________
Get the new Windows Live Messenger!
http://get.live.com/messenger/overview
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to