Nervous Govt now chants ‘Ram naam’

A deeply embarrassed government has decided to withdraw from its affidavit in  
the Ram Setu case the portion which said there is no historical and scientific  
evidence to establish the existence of Lord Ram or other characters of the  
Ramayana. The government will file a supplementary affidavit in the  Supreme 
Court on Friday.
 The decision came in the backdrop of the Opposition BJP lambasting the UPA  
for disputing Ram’s historicity. The controversial affidavit was filed by  
Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in response to petitions challenging the  
construction of the Sethusamundram ship canal project that can damage the  
prehistoric Ram Setu (or Adam’s Bridge.) The bridge, according to believers,  
helped Hanuman reach Lanka. 
 On her part, Congress president Sonia Gandhi hastily intervened to contain  
the damage. She asked the UPA government to take immediate remedial measures — 
a  message that prompted the government to address the matter on a war-footing. 
She  has also ordered an informal inquiry into the matter.
 The top Congress leadership has also sought details on the movement of the  
file. It ostensibly emanated from the ASI and travelled via the ministry of  
culture, where it should have been studied by minister Ambika Soni (currently 
in  Japan). Then it went to the law ministry headed by HR Bhardwaj. “Somebody 
has  played mischief or has been grossly derelict,” said a source.
 The ASI officer, on whose name the affidavit has been filed, told HT that the  
file went through the legal cell of the Culture Ministry.
 On Thursday, Bhardwaj told reporters, “Ram is an integral part of our history  
and culture. Ram ki vajah se saari duniya exist karti hai. It is an article of  
faith and cannot be made a matter of litigation.”
 Bhardwaj quoted liberally from scriptures to negate the impression that his  
party is anti-Hindu as its adversaries would make it out to be.
 Bhardwaj said he was in touch with additional solicitor-general Gopal  
Subramaniam over the draft of the supplementary affidavit and its explanatory  
note on withdrawing the controversial paragraph 6 that, according to him, 
should  not have been there in the first place. He added he would also meet the 
Culture  Secretary. The Minister, who earlier said Sonia had not spoken to him 
on the  matter, later got a call from Subramaniam that she had expressed strong 
and  serious concern about the contents of the original affidavit.
 "Don’t make it a political issue," was Bhardwaj’s appeal to all parties. His  
plea notwithstanding, the issue is unlikely to die out, specially when its  
opponents have said that any construction should ensure the setu’s protection.  
 The BJP, which has demanded an apology from the PM and Sonia and called for  
fixing responsibility for the faux pas, will use it to expand its base in South 
 India and consolidate its Hindu vote bank across the country while accusing 
the  Congress of minority appeasement, particularly when juxtaposed with the 
Centre’s  keennees to implement the Sachar panel’s report on the status of the 
muslim  community. 
 Leader of Opposition LK Advani lodged his protest over the contents of the  
affidavit at a dinner with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Bhardwaj. He  
assured the BJP leader that the issue of Ram’s existence cannot be made a  
subject matter of debate. 
 But the minister sidestepped the twin questions of fixing responsibility for  
the mishap and whether Ram Setu was — or wasn’t, as claimed by the original  
affidavit-a man-made structure. “I am not authorised to take action,” he said 
to  the first query. As for the second, he said that it was for the Court to go 
into  the merits of the case. 
 This is not the first time that the government has messed up things. It did  
so when it did not advise Sonia Gandhi on the office of profit issue when she  
became the National Advisory Council (NAC) chairperson.
 It happened again when George Fernandes was given a clean chit on the defence  
deals scam.At that time, the Law Ministry claimed that it was not consulted  
when, sources said, it had in fact been consulted on the matter. An angry 
Pranab  Mukherjee, then defence minister, reportedly even threatened to quit at 
the  time.


http://www.hindustantimes.com/storypage/storypage.aspx?id=
1cab0eaa-80a7-4d76-8e39-c9c92c67b4e8&ParentID=d9c8dd88-500b-
4953-8a53-2c820ddcc169&MatchID1=4541&TeamID1=6&TeamID2=7&MatchType
1=5&SeriesID1=1143&PrimaryID=4541&Headline=Nervous+Govt+now+chants+
%e2%80%98Ram+naam%e2%80%99

       
---------------------------------
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to