At 12:01 AM +0530 10/11/07, Nayanjyoti Medhi wrote:
see i told you C Da will barge in. anyway,
**** You seem to have a serious misconception about who can and who
can't or when one can participate here in a discussion or debate. I
don't need an invitation to join in on one. I can barge in on it any
time I choose to. Just as you too can.
You need to remember Nayan, that I also have another responsibility,
albeit a self-imposed one, here: Of serving as a logic detector. With
the preponderance of absurd and illogical arguments here presented by
people who could be expected to know better, day-in and day-out ,
someone needs to point them out.
maybe a plebiscite is not a bad idea at all. atleast let the whole
world know what people really want in assam. assamese people who
stay in assam, work in assam, have their families in assam, live
here and die here. they should be the ones to decide what they want.
i fully agree with C da. let there be a plebiscite. but before that
it should be gauranteed by all concerned that people's wishes will
be respected.
**** I agree wholeheartedly, with all of the above. But in addition
to that we need a couple of other conditions attached:
@@@@ That it be preceded by a reasonable period of free and
unfettered discussion and
debate among the people of Assam about the whys and of the
pros and cons of
sovereignty for Assam, so that people can make an informed judgement.
@@@@ That it be conducted under UN supervision.
**** It will be an effective way to bring the nearly thirty year
long conflict to an end, which I like to think all sincere and
honorable people want and aim for. Since ULFA has declared more than
once, that it will abide by it; to find excuses for not doing it will
be a most insincere and dishonorable pursuit, designed to promote
interests of India over Assam's.
So, will you lead the effort in Assam to generate public opinion for
it? I will back you up any way I can.
On 10/10/07, Chan Mahanta
<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That should pretty much place those who are for Assam's continued
servitude in a huge majority and thus pave the way for a plebiscite
to put an end to the speculations, wouldn't it?
Why even bother about Assam Public Works' house to house interrogation poll?
At 11:55 AM -0600 10/10/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
Jeeez.. only 5% support sovereignty and this movement? Thats bad
even from a poll that one doesn't trust.
It is encouraging to note that that some 43% sent in their votes
thru surface mail.
Any reasons why the PCG did not publish the results? Also, does
this result in any way match up with those conducted by the Assam
Public Works (or Service) group?
_________________
On 10/10/07, Nayanjyoti Medhi
<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
yes, i read the report. but now that you have pointed it out, you
can be rest assured that somebody (C Da) will deny the authenticity
of that report. i am reproducing the relevant paragraph below for
easy access. you can also see the editorial in
<http://assamtimes.org/>assamtimes.org and comment. i wrote that on
request of the webmaster.
<http://www.newswatch.in/news-analyses/attacks-on-scribes/5060.html>Assam
journalists condemn ULFA threat to editors
June 15, 2006 | Newswatch Desk | Newswatch
LAST TWO PARAGRAPHS OF THE ARTICLE ------->"The nine-member PCG,
formed on September 8, 2005, includes engineer Mukul Mahanta,
journalists Ajit Bhuyan, Haider Hussain and Diganta Konwar, medic
Brajen Gogoi, advocate Arup Borbora, advisor to the Asom
Jatiyatabadi Yuba Chatra Parishad Dilip Patgiri, advisor to the
Manab Adhikar Sangram Samiti Lachit Bordoloi, and sports organiser
Hiranya Saikia. Litterateur Indira Raisom Goswami and former
footballer player Rebati Phukan act as facilitators, and maintain
links between the government and the consultative group.
Shortly after it was formed, the group asked people of the state to
express their opinion about the peace process. About 5,670 people
responded to that survey of which 1,500 odd were through SMS,
another 1,700 through e-mails, and rest through land mail. The
results of the survey were not announced Amar Asom exposed it. The
result, according to the newspaper, only 300 or so people supported
ULFA and its cause, while the rest voiced their opinion in the
negative."
On 10/10/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Check the last para of this ---
<http://www.newswatch.in/news-analyses/attacks-on-scribes/5060.html>http://www.newswatch.in/news-analyses/attacks-on-scribes/5060.html
Looks like PCG too tried similar polls .... not sure
if the pollsters were uneducated and "IMMATURE,
UNINFORMED and UNREALISTIC to the core".
PCG was too shy to publish the results :-)
BTW, while it is fair to assume that visitors of
<http://assamtimes.org/>assamtimes.org (or even those who responded to PCG)
are not a fair representation of Assam, can someone
explain WHO forms a fair representation of Assam ---
the villagers who lynch ULFA every now and then, the
School teachers who are killed by ULFA, the traders
whose business get impacted because of regular
bombblast, the journalists who are threatened by
ULFA, the intellectuals (including AXX) who discard
the idea of Sovereignty, the NRAs ??????
Entirely faulty premise for the poll.
WHO visits <http://assamtimes.org/>assamtimes.org ? Are they a fair
representation of Assam's polity?
If the pollsters are as uneducated about as simple
an issue as this,
what will anybody learn from it?
IMMATURE, UNINFORMED and UNREALISTIC to the core.
At 12:47 AM +0530 10/10/07, Nayanjyoti Medhi wrote:
please take part in the opinion poll going on in
<
<http://www.assamtimes.org/>http://www.assamtimes.org><http://www.assamtimes.org/>
www.assamtimes.org
--
Nayanjyoti Medhi
>Advocate
Gauhati High Court
Chamber:
Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
Guwahati-781001, Assam
Phone:
+91 361 2416960
+91 94350 43007
Email:
<mailto:<mailto:nayanjyoti.medhi> nayanjyoti.medhi at
<http://gmail.com/> gmail.com>nayanjyoti.medhi at <http://gmail.com/>gmail.com
_____________________________________________________________________
_______________
Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.
<http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html> http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
<http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org>http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
--
Nayanjyoti Medhi
Advocate
Gauhati High Court
Chamber:
Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
Guwahati-781001, Assam
Phone:
+91 361 2416960
+91 94350 43007
Email:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
<http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org>
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
<http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org>http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
<http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org>
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
--
Nayanjyoti Medhi
Advocate
Gauhati High Court
Chamber:
Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
Guwahati-781001, Assam
Phone:
+91 361 2416960
+91 94350 43007
Email:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
