C'da,

You know me well enough to know that I don't carry water for anybody - GOI
included.
And does it really matter where I stand?


Well, if you must, I don't like a plebicite. I seriously think its a
red-herring for anyone interested in the well-being of Assam (both the
pro/against sovereignty people).

I think the results of a plebicite will not be helpful to anyone. It will
lead to a much bigger, and unmanageable mess from which Assam will never get
out of.Each side will bicker and moan about fraud, etc and a toothless UN
can't do a lick.

>Dilli has a billion people behind it.  The people of Assam need yOU far
more than Dilli does.

Thanks, C'da. But, you misunderstand, *I am on Assam's side* as opposed to
being on Dilli's side.
Now, what I am not sure of is being on ULFa's side is synonymous with
seeking Assam's interests? :)
And, C'da, Assam needs you more than they will ever need me.

--Ram


--Ram

On 10/10/07, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Ram:
>
>
> Instead of carrying water for Dilli, why don't you tell us where YOU
> stand?   For crying out loud , Dilli has a billion people behind it.  The
> people of Assam need yOU far more than Dilli does.
>
>
> But will you? That is the question.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 1:51 PM -0600 10/10/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
>
> Nayan,
>
>
>
> I am not sure I understand, but what is is a 'non-governmental plebicite'?
> I don't think the GOI will let that slide by either.
>
>
>
> But if you mean an informal one? Well, those, I would think, are the
> opinion polls already conducted by the PCG and APW.
>
>
>
> But a 'formal plebicite' like what C' da is suggesting under the control
> of the UN, is just next to impossible.
>
>
>
> I agree with you that the voices of the people of Assam must be heard by
> Dilli, but we must realize, even the most amiable dilliwalla will stop
> listening and harden their stance once a plebicite is mentioned.
>
>
>
> But, I come back to the original point, that Assam or any other place
> cannot be just given away by the PM or the GOI. It is NOT theirs to give
> away in the first place. That is why Nehru's "my heart goes to the people of
> Assam" speech in 1962 still hurts.
>
>
>
> >Yes, you are quite right about one thing though. who will be allowed to
> take part.
>
> >You? Me ? People like Sandip Dutta or Utpal Borpujari. Nah we won't be :)
>
>
>
> Oh! I think the problem will be the reverse. Everyone and his uncle will
> be allowed to vote - and that would include Bangladeshis.
>
> The reason why Pakistan insists on a plebicite in Kashmir (and India is
> against it) is because, over the years, the Kashnir valley has been flooded
> by Pakistanis who have forcefully driven away the indigenous people out of
> Kashmir.
>
>
>
> The solution for Assam, I think is to seek* autonomous status*. That way,
> the state has more power to control its destnity and does not have to depend
> on Dilli for each and everything. It also helps, because no one know Assam,
> her problems, and her convictions better than her own people.
>
>
>
> There are many states within the Indian union which are actually amenable
> to such an idea - specially the NE states and the Southern states. They
> could all form a coallition of sorts and force the Center to agree to more
> power to individual states.
>
>
>
> --Ram da
>
>
>
>
> On 10/10/07,* Nayanjyoti Medhi* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ram da,
>
> I know some people won't accept the results. And I do not see any role of
> the Government in this Plebiscite. The government cant and won't do this but
> since the PCG has tried. Let them try again. Maybe an non Governmental
> Plebiscite funded by the ULFA. It does not have to be a Government sponsored
> one naa. The issue is that people of Assam should be heard and there should
> be a guarantee that the people's choice will be respected. Thats all I or
> for that matter any sensible Assamese would want. And when you talk of
> threat and fear, well...... we have been living with it. nothing new about
> it. Yes, you are quite right about one thing though. who will be allowed to
> take part. You? Me ? People like Sandip Dutta or Utpal Borpujari. Nah we
> won't be :)
>
>
>
> On 10/11/07,* Ram Sarangapani* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> >maybe a plebiscite is not a bad idea at all. atleast
>
>
>
> Hehehe! Not so fast. Here are some potential problems I see in the way it
> is conducted, and who will be allowed to take part in it.
>
>
>
> It would be a bad idea if illegal Bangladeshi's or ISI types are
> also given a chance to voice their opinion.
>
> And how will this be conducted? Even today, when there is a call for Assam
> bondho, there is no one to challenge it. Will the plebicite be conducted
> under the threat of violence?
>
>
>
> And lastly, Nayan, we have seen in even this microscopic sample (Assam
> net), we are not able to even accept the results of a poll nor come to a
> consensus, and you think, C'da and others will accept something as serious
> as a plebicite if it goes against their wishes?
>
>
>
> Lastly, I seriously doubt if the Indian Govt. will accept to hold a
> plebicite. Agreeing to hold a plebicite would be tantamount to declaring
> (for the Govt,) that maybe, just maybe Assam could be sovereign, and the
> Govts. points are not that strong.
>
>
>
> Furthermore, the Govt. of India is just a CARETAKER of the country and her
> people. It does not have* any rights* to give away portions of the country
> when it pleases, or even hold plebicites* that could well cast doubts in
> the territorial integrity of the country* . Well, thats the way I
> understand the essence of the Indian Constitution. That I think is a big
> reason why Kashmir couldn't have a plebicite either.
>
>
>
> In any case, IMHO, like Kashmir, the role for a plebicite is too late for
> Assam
>
>
> --Ram
>
>
> On 10/10/07,* Nayanjyoti Medhi* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> see i told you C Da will barge in. anyway, maybe a plebiscite is not a bad
> idea at all. atleast let the whole world know what people really want in
> assam. assamese people who stay in assam, work in assam, have their families
> in assam, live here and die here. they should be the ones to decide what
> they want. i fully agree with C da. let there be a plebiscite. but before
> that it should be gauranteed by all concerned that people's wishes will be
> respected.
>
>
>
> On 10/10/07,* Chan Mahanta* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> That should pretty much place those who are for Assam's continued
> servitude in a huge majority and thus pave the way for a plebiscite to put
> an end to the speculations, wouldn't it?
>
>
>
>
> Why even bother about Assam Public Works' house to house interrogation
> poll?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 11:55 AM -0600 10/10/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
>
> Jeeez.. only 5% support sovereignty and this movement? Thats bad even
> from a poll that one doesn't trust.
>
>
>
> It is encouraging to note that that some 43% sent in their votes thru
> surface mail.
>
>
>
> Any reasons why the PCG did not publish the results?  Also, does this
> result in any way match up with those conducted by the Assam Public Works
> (or Service) group?
>
>
>
> _________________
>
> On 10/10/07,* Nayanjyoti Medhi* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yes, i read the report. but now that you have pointed it out, you can be
> rest assured that somebody (C Da) will deny the authenticity of that report.
> i am reproducing the relevant paragraph below for easy access. you can also
> see the editorial in assamtimes.org  and comment. i wrote that on request
> of the webmaster.
>
>
>
> *Assam journalists condemn ULFA threat to 
> editors*<http://www.newswatch.in/news-analyses/attacks-on-scribes/5060.html>
>
> June 15, 2006 | Newswatch Desk | Newswatch
>
> LAST TWO PARAGRAPHS OF THE ARTICLE ------->"The nine-member PCG, formed on
> September 8, 2005, includes engineer Mukul Mahanta, journalists Ajit Bhuyan,
> Haider Hussain and Diganta Konwar, medic Brajen Gogoi, advocate Arup
> Borbora, advisor to the Asom Jatiyatabadi Yuba Chatra Parishad Dilip
> Patgiri, advisor to the Manab Adhikar Sangram Samiti Lachit Bordoloi, and
> sports organiser Hiranya Saikia. Litterateur Indira Raisom Goswami and
> former footballer player Rebati Phukan act as facilitators, and maintain
> links between the government and the consultative group.
>
> Shortly after it was formed, the group asked people of the state to
> express their opinion about the peace process. About 5,670 people responded
> to that survey of which 1,500 odd were through SMS, another 1,700 through
> e-mails, and rest through land mail. The results of the survey were not
> announced Amar Asom exposed it. The result, according to the newspaper, only
> 300 or so people supported ULFA and its cause, while the rest voiced their
> opinion in the negative."
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/10/07,* Krishnendu Chakraborty* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Check the last para of this ---
> http://www.newswatch.in/news-analyses/attacks-on-scribes/5060.html
>
> Looks like PCG too tried similar polls ....  not sure
>
> if the pollsters were uneducated and  "IMMATURE,
> UNINFORMED and UNREALISTIC to the core".
>
> PCG was too shy to publish the results :-)
>
> BTW, while it is fair to assume that visitors of
> assamtimes.org (or even those who responded to PCG)
> are not a fair representation of Assam, can someone
> explain WHO forms a fair representation of Assam  ---
> the villagers who lynch ULFA every now and then,  the
> School teachers who are killed by ULFA, the traders
> whose business get impacted because of regular
> bombblast,  the journalists who are threatened by
> ULFA,  the intellectuals (including AXX) who discard
> the idea of Sovereignty,  the NRAs ??????
>
>
> >>Entirely faulty premise for the poll.
>
> >>WHO visits assamtimes.org ? Are they a fair
> representation of Assam's polity?
>
> >>If the pollsters are as uneducated about as simple
> an issue as this,
> what will anybody learn from it?
>
> >>IMMATURE, UNINFORMED and UNREALISTIC to the core.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 12:47 AM +0530 10/10/07, Nayanjyoti Medhi wrote:
> >please take part in the opinion poll going on in
> >< http://www.assamtimes.org> www.assamtimes.org
> >
> >--
> >Nayanjyoti Medhi
>
> >Advocate
> >Gauhati High Court
> >
> >Chamber:
> >Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
> >Guwahati-781001, Assam
> >
> >Phone:
> >+91 361 2416960
> >+91 94350 43007
> >
> >Email:
> ><mailto: nayanjyoti.medhi at
> gmail.com>nayanjyoti.medhi at gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
>      _____________________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo!
> Autos.
> http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Nayanjyoti Medhi
> Advocate
> Gauhati High Court
>
> Chamber:
> Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
> Guwahati-781001, Assam
>
>
> Phone:
> +91 361 2416960
> +91 94350 43007
>
> Email:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> Nayanjyoti Medhi
> Advocate
> Gauhati High Court
>
> Chamber:
> Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
> Guwahati-781001, Assam
>
>
> Phone:
> +91 361 2416960
> +91 94350 43007
>
> Email:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> Nayanjyoti Medhi
> Advocate
> Gauhati High Court
>
> Chamber:
> Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
> Guwahati-781001, Assam
>
>
> Phone:
> +91 361 2416960
> +91 94350 43007
>
> Email:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to