>>**** So does that therefore make assamtimes poll a >scientific, >representative and objective one?
C'da , as usual, you could not come out of your habit of putting words in ones mouth. I NEVER said that because PCG did one, assamtimes poll is scientific. However, the question I have for you ... will you use the same strong words (uneducated, immature, uninformed etc) against PCG? If not, WHY? >>If it does , because PCG too allegedly conducted >one, then should we >NOT surmise that everyone >else ought to heed what PCG does or advise? Wouldn't >that be the >logical conclusion? ***** ALLEGEDLY ???? If PCG did not conduct one they can readily file a defamation suite against the news papers. Did they ??? If PCG first adhere to the verdict of people as per the poll which they conducted, we should have no reason not to heed to their advise. But the million dollar question is .... is PCG willing to hear the voice of people or are they moving with a pre-determined notion (and that seems to be the reason why they did not want to share results of poll). >can someone explain WHO forms a fair representation of Assam --- >>**** How about trying it yourself? Is it that hard a task? *** Good that you answered it, in your own way of course :-) Utpal should now be aware of quality of responses he can expect from you. Utpal, you can also check the thread "slept like a baby" to have the whole gamut of response you can expect from C'da ! >>*** Is that the best list of who consist of the >>people of Assam you >>could come up with? *** Well, I guess I missed one ..... the Bangladeshis. In fact, I think it is best if the poll is conducted in Bangladesh ... you know, where our future leaders are breeding.... what do you say :-) At 10:15 AM -0700 10/10/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: >Check the last para of this --- >http://www.newswatch.in/news-analyses/attacks-on-scribes/5060.html > >Looks like PCG too tried similar polls .... not sure >if the pollsters were uneducated and "IMMATURE, >UNINFORMED and UNREALISTIC to the core". >>**** So does that therefore make assamtimes poll a scientific, representative and objective one? >>If it does , because PCG too allegedly conducted >one, then should we >NOT surmise that everyone >else ought to heed what PCG does or advise? Wouldn't >that be the >logical conclusion? > >BTW, while it is fair to assume that visitors of assamtimes.org >(or even those who responded to PCG) >are not a fair representation of Assam, **** Do I need to explain that? If I do, it will certainly mean that it will be an entirely wasted effort. >can someone explain WHO forms a fair representation of Assam --- **** How about trying it yourself? Is it that hard a task? > >the villagers who lynch ULFA every now and then, the School >teachers who are killed by ULFA, the >traders whose business get >impacted because of regular >bombblast, the journalists who are threatened byULFA, the >intellectuals (including AXX) who >discardthe idea of Sovereignty, >the NRAs ?????? *** Is that the best list of who consist of the people of Assam you could come up with? We can see now why you ask the questions you do. > >PCG was too shy to publish the results :-) > >BTW, while it is fair to assume that visitors of >assamtimes.org (or even those who responded to PCG) >are not a fair representation of Assam, can someone >explain WHO forms a fair representation of Assam --- >the villagers who lynch ULFA every now and then, the >School teachers who are killed by ULFA, the traders >whose business get impacted because of regular >bombblast, the journalists who are threatened by >ULFA, the intellectuals (including AXX) who discard >the idea of Sovereignty, the NRAs ?????? > > >>>Entirely faulty premise for the poll. > >>>WHO visits assamtimes.org ? Are they a fair >representation of Assam's polity? > >>>If the pollsters are as uneducated about as simple >an issue as this, >what will anybody learn from it? > >>>IMMATURE, UNINFORMED and UNREALISTIC to the core. > > > > > > > > > >At 12:47 AM +0530 10/10/07, Nayanjyoti Medhi wrote: >>please take part in the opinion poll going on in >><http://www.assamtimes.org>www.assamtimes.org >> >>-- >>Nayanjyoti Medhi >>Advocate >>Gauhati High Court >> >>Chamber: >>Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East >>Guwahati-781001, Assam >> >>Phone: >>+91 361 2416960 >>+91 94350 43007 >> >>Email: >><mailto:nayanjyoti.medhi at >gmail.com>nayanjyoti.medhi at gmail.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
