Dilip-da
when I joined this forum (after a long break), Babul
called me to verify my authenticity.
So, it would be difficult for imposters (like a group
of Mekuris we had earlier) to hover around. At least
Babul/ Xourov / Jugal-da must be knowing that there is
some genuine person behind every email ID.
>>I have a comment on the genuineness of the ULFA
>>letter. Supposedly the letter is written and signed
>>by Rubi (with an i) Bhuyan. Note how the writer's
>>name is spelt as "Ruby" (with a y) in the first
>paragraph of the letter. Are Ruby and Rubi the same
>person? Rubi, the author of the letter does not how
>to spell his/her name?
Anyway the main point is - how can the netters
assume that they are actually in communication with
someone from ULFA and debating with the right people,
when in reality some impostor is having fun at the
expense of the gullible netters.
This net has seen such invasion from pseudonames and
impostors in the past and one can never be sure these
days in the realm of electronic mail. Just a word of
caution before the thread becomes two miles long.
Dilip Deka
umesh sharma <jaipurschool at yahoo.com> wrote:
For a moment I thought it was a letter of demand of
ransom or bully money - common ploy used by bullies
and mafia to brow beat a vigilant citizen. Not
uncommon in urban Bihar or Mumbai's movie circles
either.
It doesn't seem to be any different to me.
Umesh
Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
X-YMail-OSG:
L_aDRggVM1lY1TfXGmsAjJdRJ60mRHmQAlQUN.y1zbdzK07y3N0P3zEIb.fvkZQFoA--
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:38:37 +0100 (BST)
From: ulfa_ 1979April7 <ulfa_1979april7 at
yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Shantikam here
To: Shantikam Hazarika <aimghy at satyam.net.in>
Cc: nayanjyoti.medhi at gmail.com, krish_gau at
yahoo.com, cmahanta at charter.net,
mikemahant at hotmail.com, assamrs at gmail.com,
aimghy at satyam.net.in
X-Chzlrs: 0
Mr Shantikam Hazarika, Your relevant mail has
proven that, your real intention is to destroy the
National Liberation Struggle of Asom by attacking Ruby
Bhuyan of the ULFA like a rabid dog biting people on
the street indiscriminately. We thank you for
revealing your design. We do not wish to insult
you by trying to make you knowledgeable how the modern
communications have made the world a small place.
However, we are at a loss to make out why are you
unaware of the aim of the ULFA¢s past Twenty-Eight
years of struggle in Asom? Excepting a yokel, a person
like you well versed in advanced technology, should
not have to come up with such a view. The debate in
question was not put forward in a manner of your
requirement of ¡asked them in plain, straight forward
English¢. You are trying to throw blows in the air
just to sweep this deficiency under the carpet. We
would like to remind you that the debate took place as
a result of Nayan Parasar criticizing impertinently
in the Asom On Line forum ¡the get well wish¢
statement of our Honourable Chairman Arobinda Rajkhowa
when Dr. Mamoni Goswami fell ill. Criticism of a ¡Get
well wish¢ cannot be ¡Honest,gentle, civilized¢. But
you approving his subterfuge and attacking the ULFA
with vindictive words have been noted in the net.
You may not be aware that about ten years ago Prof.
Jugal Kalita linking the ULFA website to the Assam Org
site there was an objection raised by one Supratik
Gupta. Following this there was a long debate between
Arun Mahanta, a member of the ULFA¢s Central Publicity
Group and Supratik Gupta. In this debate, Supratik was
given detailed replies with unambiguous views the ULFA
holds. Supratik Gupta was not satisfied with it, but,
the ULFA was very frank in giving out replies. He
wished to know what his status would be in a Sovereign
Independent Assam to a person of Bangladesh origin. We
must say that Supratik Gupta behaved like a gentleman.
On the other hand your good
man Nayan Parasar does not sound at all a gentleman,
but a sycophant bent upon keeping Asom under colonial
occupation forever. We are analysing of the reasons
why should you be promoting the sycophancy of Parasar
as something very honourable. If you really want a
useful discussion, you are welcome to come forward in
earnest. Do you think only your type are the ones who
deserves respect? You do not have to instigate any one
to have a debate with us. In this instant what has
unfolded puts you in the same defiled platform as with
Nayan Parasr and Utpal Borpujari. Otherwise we could
have a meaningful dignified debate in the meantime.
Instead of scornfulness and insulting, a simple
request on the query would have an appropriate
approach. Now, in trying to prove the mastery of
English or lack of it, has pushed aside our willing to
be engaged in a meaningful discussion from the
original debate. There is saying, ¡Faith is all about
belief and destructive criticism shakes such
beliefs¢ and a similar response by yourselves has
ruined the possibility of productive engagement in
this instance. Why are you all trying to damage the
Mahanta brothers now? Rubi bhuyan central
publicity member,ulfa
____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel
and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
