Though we have federalism in USA, the states have not exercised the rights a 
lot. The diversity is not that great for the states to go their own way. Also 
most people want to be an American first, then a Texan or a Californian.
  If federalism fits the needs in Iraq, why not? Who says power needs to remain 
in Baghdad? 
  Taking it further, who says Delhi has to control all of India? Why can't 
there be federalism in India? Do some people including the central leaders 
think federalism exists in India already?
  Dilip Deka
  ==================================================
  Shiite leader backs Iraqi regional plan 
        By HAMZA HENDAWI, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 56 minutes ago 
  

  BAGHDAD - The son and heir apparent of Iraq's top Shiite politician came out 
strongly Saturday in favor of autonomy for Iraq's religiously and ethnically 
divided regions, a potentially explosive issue on Iraq's already highly 
polarized political landscape. 
             if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); 
window.yzq_d['mOG1Q9G_fyg-']='&U=13alc0ihj%2fN%3dmOG1Q9G_fyg-%2fC%3d569350.9807549.10816590.1442997%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d4534689';
   
  Ammar al-Hakim, who is being groomed to take over the Supreme Islamic Iraqi 
Council, the country's largest Shiite party, has been a firm supporter of 
federalism from the outset. But his unusually strident language appeared to 
signal growing impatience with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's inaction on key 
issues and his failure to bring fractured groups together.
  Addressing hundreds of supporters at the party's Baghdad headquarters, 
al-Hakim called on Iraqis to press ahead with the creation of self-rule 
regions, but cautioned that the country's unity must be safeguarded.
  "Federalism is one way to accomplish this goal," he said.
  He said Baghdad's monopoly of power over decision-making and national wealth 
had turned the central government into a "tyrannical and dominating" body.
  "I call on the sons of our nation to create their (self-rule) regions," 
al-Hakim said.
  The idea of breaking up Iraq into self-rule entities has gained traction in 
Washington after two lawmakers — Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., and Sen. Sam 
Brownback, R-Kan. — proposed giving more control to ethnically and religiously 
divided regions.
  A nonbinding resolution to that effect won Senate approval last month, but 
Republicans supported it only after the measure was amended to make clear that 
President Bush should press for a new federalized system only if the Iraqis 
wanted it.
  Al-Maliki and other Iraqi politicians denounced the decision as an 
infringement on Iraq's sovereignty. But President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd and 
firm proponent of federalism, praised the resolution, saying it cemented Iraq's 
unity and opposed its breakup.
  Al-Hakim is the son of Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, the Supreme Council leader who 
was diagnosed with cancer in May and has been receiving chemotherapy treatment 
in Iran.
  The younger al-Hakim delivered the remarks in a sermon commemorating the 
start of the Muslim Eid al-Fitr feast that marks the end of Ramadan, the 
Islamic month of fasting. His father, the organization's patriarch, greeted 
well-wishers at the ceremony but did not address the crowd.
  The Supreme Council has been a staunch backer of federalism and wants the 
country's mainly Shiite and oil-rich south become a self-rule region similar to 
that established 16 years ago by minority Kurds in northern Iraq.
  The Iraqi constitution, adopted two years ago, provides for a federal system. 
A year ago, parliament pushed through a law allowing the formation of federal 
regions but not for 18 months.
  Regardless, federal regions cannot be formed before nationwide elections are 
first held for local councils. Those councils will decide on seeking union with 
other provinces to form a federal region. No date has been set for the vote 
because parliament has yet to pass legislation on the organization of local 
elections.
  The law is one of several Washington has been pressing al-Maliki's government 
to push through parliament to enhance reconciliation. Others would ensure 
equitable distribution of oil wealth and reinstatement of Saddam Hussein 
loyalists in government jobs.
  Al-Maliki has failed to achieve progress on the wanted legislation despite a 
major eight-month-old security drive in Baghdad and surrounding regions that 
was launched in part to give him the room he needs to make political 
compromises.
  The joint U.S.-Iraqi operation has reduced the level of violence but failed 
to stem it altogether. On Saturday, a spokesman said Iraqi forces clashed with 
suspected al-Qaida-linked insurgents during a four-day operation in a Sunni 
enclave in central Baghdad.
  Brig. Gen. Qassim al-Moussawi, an Iraqi military spokesman, said 48 gunmen 
were killed in the fighting, in which Iraqi army soldiers were supported by 
local Sunni tribesmen and other civilians who have turned against al-Qaida in 
the volatile Fadhil neighborhood.   The U.S. military did not immediately 
respond to a request for comment.   Saturday, however, saw Iraq's civilian 
death toll fall to its lowest level in recent memory, with only four people 
killed or found dead nationwide, according to reports from police, morgue 
officials and credible witnesses.   The daily number of civilians killed, not 
including those on days when there were massive casualties from car bombings, 
had climbed above 100 at the end of 2006 and the beginning of 2007.   Still, 
security is the main concern in Iraq, more than four years after the U.S. 
invasion, but the question of federalism is potentially explosive and could 
deepen the sectarian divide.   Iraq's once-dominant Sunni Arabs, for
 example, fear that it would lead to the country's breakup into a Shiite south 
and a Kurdish north, both with considerable oil wealth, leaving Sunnis the 
resource-poor central region. They see the creation of an autonomous region in 
the south as a scheme engineered by Shiite, non-Arab Iran to gain a permanent 
foothold in Iraq.   But not all of Iraq's majority Shiites back autonomy.   The 
Sadrists, a parliamentary bloc loyal to Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, are 
flatly opposed to it, while others, like al-Maliki's Dawa Party, warn that 
federalism could deepen Iraq's security and sectarian woes if implemented soon.


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to