http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/5721.html

what are the constraints for ULFA or is it merely lacking info about options or 
do they hae hidden interests?

Umesh
Mistake 2: They Are Not Irrational; They Have Hidden Constraints: Case -- US 
NOn Profits against poor country farmers
 In 2005, the U.S. government passed legislation to increase food aid to 
countries that were in dire need of such assistance. There was much support 
among politicians and activists for this initiative. Not surprisingly, however, 
there were also certain special-interest groups that opposed this legislation. 
Here's what was surprising: One of the groups that voiced opposition was a 
consortium of nonprofit organizations whose mission it was to lobby for an 
increase in food aid to disadvantaged countries! What explains such seemingly 
irrational and self-defeating behavior? Why would this group oppose legislation 
that achieves precisely what it purports to want?
  The answer lies not in understanding the group's interests but in 
understanding its constraints. In order to increase the amount of food sent to 
disadvantaged countries, the consortium had in the past partnered with American 
farmers to lobby the U.S. government jointly for greater aid. Why did the 
farmers join in this campaign? Because when the U.S. government increased food 
aid, it bought more food from American farmers. As a result, both the farmers 
and the nonprofits got what they wanted.

This case, however, was different. Mindful of escalating budget deficits, 
Congress had decided that the only way to increase foreign food aid was to 
purchase the food more cheaply—not from American farmers but from developing 
countries. What would appear to be a double win for the nonprofits (increased 
food aid and increased support for poor farmers in developing countries) 
instead created a predicament. If the nonprofits supported the legislation, 
they would be severing ties with their long-standing coalition partner, the 
American farmer. Instead, the nonprofits decided that their long-term interests 
were best served by opposing legislation. This may still seem like a 
questionable decision on moral, ethical, or other grounds, but it seems 
irrational only when we overlook the hidden constraints facing the nonprofits.





Umesh Sharma

Washington D.C. 

1-202-215-4328 [Cell]

Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu info)

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ (Management Info)




www.gse.harvard.edu/iep  (where the above 2 are used )




http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/
       
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to