My heart goes out for you. But if you don't agree with what I wrote you can pull the material together and present it to netters. Most of us understand ordinary English here.
At 11:27 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: >All three are your arguments so how can we, >half-brained and what not folks figure out what you >are trying to say ... it is too difficult to >understand such high level moving arguments. > >I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi >experts wrote same piece like a Desi who graduated >from a school/college sporting the name of some >Christian saint > > >>>Why don't you tell us which? > >>>Are you not upto it? > > > > > > > > > >At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty >wrote: >> >But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, >it >>is the >>COMPREHENSION of it. >> >>>I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( >>>to anyone who >>>reads and comprehends ordinary English) >> >> >>Hmmm .... a different argument then "Yet another >>PSEUDO scientific account" OR "unadulterated >>garbage". >> >>With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the >>half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true -- >> >>1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific >>OR >>2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage >>OR >>3) Fed research materials are correct but we are >>unable to comprehend it. >>OR >>All three above >> >>> >If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there >>may >>>be more garbage) , it implies that --- >> >> >> >>>**** There may very well be. Is that unthinkable? >> >> >>>But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it >>is the >>COMPREHENSION of it. >> >>>I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( >>>to anyone who >>>reads and comprehends ordinary English) >>>that the SW monsoons go to the NE but cannot drop >>>its load there, >>>so it veers westwards >>>and trudging over the Gangetic plains unloads it at >>>Dilli and >>Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what >>have you >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>At 9:37 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty >>wrote: >>>I have no arguments regarding the monsoon pattern. I >>>do not think that I have enough knowledge to >>>authoratitively speak on this subject, more so, >>since >>>my school education (Desi School education that is >>:-) >>>) agrees to what you mentioned. >>> >>>However, the concern here is the site from where >>this >>>has been picked up. >>> >>>I find the following statements in that site --- >>> >>>1) This Web site contains the online versions of >>books >>>previously published (1988-98) in hard copy by the >>>Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress >>>under the Country Studies/Area Handbook Program >>>sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army. >>> >>>2) The Federal Research Division provides customized >>>research and analytical services on domestic and >>>international subjects to agencies of the United >>>States Government, the District of Columbia, and >>>authorized Federal contractors on a cost-recovery >>>basis. >>> >>>If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may >>>be more garbage) , it implies that --- >>> >>>1) Federal Research Division published garbage >>under >>>a program sponsored by US Army >>> >>>2) Any Tom, Dick Harry can write a piece of garbage >>>and get it published by Federal Research Division >>> >>>3) The agencies of US Government and Federal >>>Contractors are fed with such garbage. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary >>>>>of Congress does >>>>>not in any way, shape or form guarantee its >>>>>accuracy, veracity , >>>>>usefulness or any such other quality. >>> >>>>>It is like a storage vault, a library. In a >library >>>>>you can get works >>>>>of genius as well as unadulterated garbage. >>> >>>>>Is that hard to imagine, that you would argue the >>>point? >>> >>> >>> >>>>>About the issue involved does it need high >>>scientific training to > >>>>imagine that the SW Monsoons that travel to Assam >>>retraces its >>>>>steps because there was no one home to receive the >>>order? So it >>>>>returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli? >>> >>> >>>>>What kind of a moron would argue such a point, >tell >>>me? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>At 8:26 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty >>>wrote: >>>> >>**** Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, >of >>>the >>>>>>tanker truck >>>>>>driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon >>>>>>expertise on it, so be >>>>>>it! > > > > >____________________________________________________________________________________ >Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos. >http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html > > > > >_______________________________________________ >assam mailing list >[email protected] >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
