Good that you do not have a heart burn ..... since
you were advising me, I just thought -- Churey Churor
theng dekha pai
> >You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or
Tums if
>you are already out of stock .... or do you maintain
a
>super jumbo stock at home ?
>>*** Do I sound like the one having a bad time here?
>>I an actually
>>enjoying it. It is a nice diversion from my nose to
>>the grindstone.
At 2:16 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
wrote:
>The issue is your twist and your blame everything on
>India which netters are aware of.
>
>It has now been proved beyond doubt that CM tried to
>blame the content on Desi Education and then did an
>ABOUT TURN when pointed out that the Content was
>provided by his Bidesi Experts
>
>>>Anyway, I do stand by all my comments
>
>The tragedy is ... you yourself do not know which is
>your comment ... the Fed Researchers publish junk or
>the desi fellows cannot comprehend those finely
>written piece
>
>You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or Tums
if
>you are already out of stock .... or do you maintain
a
>super jumbo stock at home ?
>
>
>
>>>The issue was what Umesh learned from Wiki U,
wasn't
>it?
>
>>>Or was it something I concocted, putting words in
>UMesh's or your mouths ?
>
>>>Anyway, I do stand by all my comments , which were
>in response to
>whatever came from Umesh or yourself.
>
>>>The challenge for you is to prove to the world of
>assamnetters that
>>>I , CM was wrong on one or all counts. And in order
>>>for you to be
>able to do that, you still will have to show that the
>main issue:
>>>Umesh's understanding of what he read was indeed
>correct and
>>>therefore cm's comments were uncalled for,
>incorrect, malicious,
>subversive, anti-Indian, anti_ US, anti_Umesh,
>anti-Krishnendu or
>whatever other terms of endearment you can conjure
up.
>
>>>That would then make me look bad, you ( and Umesh)
>will feel
>>>vindicated and redeem your honor. Otherwise it will
>be a stiff dose
>of Mylanta or Pepto Bismol tonight for sure. I won't
>>>even make case
>of how you will appear to your peers.That won't be
>>>cool. I hate to
>see my fellow netters in such pain, even though self
>inflicted.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 1:19 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
>wrote:
>>It has NOTHING to do whether Umesh's view of
delivery
>>truck doing about turn is correct .
>>
>>It is about YOUR about turn --
>>
>>1) YOU ascribed the Wiki info on some Desi
>>
>>2) YOU mentioned that the site Umesh refered to is
>>"Yet another PSEUDO scientific account"
>>
>>3) When pointed out that is the same info as
>published
>>by LoC, YOU said it is garbage
>>
>>4) When pointed that it is published by Fed
Research,
>>YOU did an about turn --- the info is correct
>>comprehension is wrong ..... then WHY not spell it
>>out in first place and WHY ascribe the Wiki content
>on
>>some hapless Desi ??
>>
>>Huh ... thumping chest even when the twists and
about
>>turns are staring on yor face.
>>
>>
>>>>If so what kind of support are you receiving from
>>>>your fan-mail in
>>>>assamnet? And if the fans are not responding ,
>>>>have you considered
>>>>conducting a poll on it ?
>>
>>I have my own fan following but do not want to give
>>you a heart burn.
>>It is better not to go for a poll. When the results
>go
>>against you, you will start calling it a farce (just
>>the way some newspaper published a false report on
>PCG
>>polls :-) )
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>And from reading the material you put forth, is it
>>>>your considered
>>>>opinion that Umesh's reading of it
>>>>in line of the delivery truck doing an about turn
>>>>was the correct
>>>>conclusion ?
>>
>>>>If so what kind of support are you receiving from
>>>>your fan-mail in
>>>>assamnet? And if the fans are not responding ,
>>>>have you considered
>>>>conducting a poll on it ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>t 12:41 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
>>wrote:
>>>The material, including your various moving
>>arguments,
>>>are already in this forum. Netters are very well
>>>aware how the arguments shifted ... not for the
>first
>>>time though
> >>
>>>
>>>Next time, before ascribing something on "Desi
>School
>>>sporting the name of some Christian saint" just
>>check
>>>your backyard. May be the author of Wiki is one of
>>>your home grown expert researcher !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>*** Unless you give them the material under
>>>>>contention how do you
>>>>>expect them to judge it?
>>>
>>>>>Sheeesh!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
>>>wrote:
>>>>Hope some enlightened netter who understand
>ordinary
>>>>english can explain me which of your argument is
>>true
>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific
>>>>OR
>>>>2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage
>>>>OR
>>>>3) Fed research materials are correct but we are
>>>>unable to comprehend it.
>>>>OR
>>>>All three above
>>>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
