>At 3:06 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: >Good that you do not have a heart burn ..... since you were advising me, I just thought -- Churey Churor theng dekha pai
**** I know what you mean. That takes care of my problem. But what about yours? Have you been able to reconcile your conflicts and stress ? I ask because I am not sure if you had successfully concluded your mission. What is your feedback from your supporters? Enough to make it feel like the effort was worth it? At 3:06 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: >Good that you do not have a heart burn ..... since >you were advising me, I just thought -- Churey Churor >theng dekha pai > > > > >> >You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or >Tums if >>you are already out of stock .... or do you maintain >a >>super jumbo stock at home ? > > >>>*** Do I sound like the one having a bad time here? >>>I an actually >>>enjoying it. It is a nice diversion from my nose to >>>the grindstone. > > > > > > > > >At 2:16 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty >wrote: >>The issue is your twist and your blame everything on >>India which netters are aware of. >> >>It has now been proved beyond doubt that CM tried to >>blame the content on Desi Education and then did an >>ABOUT TURN when pointed out that the Content was >>provided by his Bidesi Experts >> >>>>Anyway, I do stand by all my comments >> >>The tragedy is ... you yourself do not know which is >>your comment ... the Fed Researchers publish junk or >>the desi fellows cannot comprehend those finely >>written piece >> >>You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or Tums >if >>you are already out of stock .... or do you maintain >a >>super jumbo stock at home ? >> >> >> >>>>The issue was what Umesh learned from Wiki U, >wasn't >>it? >> >>>>Or was it something I concocted, putting words in >>UMesh's or your mouths ? >> >>>>Anyway, I do stand by all my comments , which were >>in response to >>whatever came from Umesh or yourself. >> >>>>The challenge for you is to prove to the world of >>assamnetters that >>>>I , CM was wrong on one or all counts. And in order >>>>for you to be >>able to do that, you still will have to show that the >>main issue: >>>>Umesh's understanding of what he read was indeed >>correct and >>>>therefore cm's comments were uncalled for, >>incorrect, malicious, >>subversive, anti-Indian, anti_ US, anti_Umesh, >>anti-Krishnendu or >>whatever other terms of endearment you can conjure >up. >> >>>>That would then make me look bad, you ( and Umesh) >>will feel >>>>vindicated and redeem your honor. Otherwise it will >>be a stiff dose >>of Mylanta or Pepto Bismol tonight for sure. I won't >>>>even make case >>of how you will appear to your peers.That won't be >>>>cool. I hate to >>see my fellow netters in such pain, even though self >>inflicted. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>At 1:19 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty >>wrote: >>>It has NOTHING to do whether Umesh's view of >delivery >>>truck doing about turn is correct . >>> >>>It is about YOUR about turn -- >>> >>>1) YOU ascribed the Wiki info on some Desi >>> >>>2) YOU mentioned that the site Umesh refered to is >>>"Yet another PSEUDO scientific account" >>> >>>3) When pointed out that is the same info as >>published >>>by LoC, YOU said it is garbage >>> >>>4) When pointed that it is published by Fed >Research, >>>YOU did an about turn --- the info is correct >>>comprehension is wrong ..... then WHY not spell it >>>out in first place and WHY ascribe the Wiki content >>on >>>some hapless Desi ?? >>> >>>Huh ... thumping chest even when the twists and >about >>>turns are staring on yor face. >>> >>> >>>>>If so what kind of support are you receiving from >>>>>your fan-mail in >>>>>assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , >>>>>have you considered >>>>>conducting a poll on it ? >>> >>>I have my own fan following but do not want to give >>>you a heart burn. >>>It is better not to go for a poll. When the results > >go >>>against you, you will start calling it a farce (just >>>the way some newspaper published a false report on >>PCG >>>polls :-) ) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>And from reading the material you put forth, is it >>>>>your considered >>>>>opinion that Umesh's reading of it >>>>>in line of the delivery truck doing an about turn >>>>>was the correct >>>>>conclusion ? >>> >>>>>If so what kind of support are you receiving from >>>>>your fan-mail in >>>>>assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , >>>>>have you considered >>>>>conducting a poll on it ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>t 12:41 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty >>>wrote: >>>>The material, including your various moving >>>arguments, >>>>are already in this forum. Netters are very well >>>>aware how the arguments shifted ... not for the >>first >>>>time though >> >> >>>> >>>>Next time, before ascribing something on "Desi >>School >>>>sporting the name of some Christian saint" just >>>check >>>>your backyard. May be the author of Wiki is one of >>>>your home grown expert researcher ! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>*** Unless you give them the material under >>>>>>contention how do you >>>>>>expect them to judge it? >>>> >>>>>>Sheeesh! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty >>>>wrote: >>>>>Hope some enlightened netter who understand >>ordinary >>>>>english can explain me which of your argument is >>>true >>>>>-- >>>>> >>>>>1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific >>>>>OR >>>>>2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage >>>>>OR >>>>>3) Fed research materials are correct but we are >>>>>unable to comprehend it. >>>>>OR >>>>>All three above >>>> > > > > >____________________________________________________________________________________ >Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. >http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/ > >_______________________________________________ >assam mailing list >[email protected] >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
