How Tata & Ambani Corrupted Indian Judiciary? 
Are Consumers Terrorists? 
Corrupted Only  by Tata and Ambani? 
Only Judiciary and Lawyers Corrupted?
 
Who allowed Electric Supply Cos to cheat all consumers except Govt  MLA/ MP's
Discuss/Define/Justify  every entry into an Electric Bill:

Connected Load Minimum  Fixed Charge--?
Capacitor Surcharge?
Maximum Demand  surcharge
BSI approved Meter
You can trace back every Cheating to the book of Words.
Scrap it!
mm


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:58:08 
+0530Subject: Re: [WaterWatch] How Tata & Ambani Corrupted Indian Judiciary




Interesting observation. One must also point out that in spite of repeated 
warnings not to disconnect power to reduce losses due to theft, a move that 
inconvenienced a much larger number of people than they target at, they have 
been continuing to do so. 
On 10/22/07, Ravinder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 







How Tata & Ambani Corrupted Indian Judiciary? 
Are Consumers Terrorists?  
 
I started investigation in to the BRPL/BYPL/NDPL loot in Delhi "With Magnifying 
Glass" after news appeared wherein Supreme Court has asked NCDRC " Are 
electricity users consumers" which is clipped here. 
 
http://www.ficci.com/media-room/speeches-presentations/2007/july/rakeshmehta.pdf
 
http://www.ficci.com/media-room/speeches-presentations/2007/july/ajaydhagat.pdf 
 
The first document was the presentation of Rakesh Mehta former MCD chief who 
turned a blind eye to unauthorized Commercial Complexes coming up on main roads 
and even highways in grossest violations of building byelaws. But what I found 
was even more stunning. 
 
BRPL/BYPL/NDPL so thoroughly corrupted our Bureaucrats, Technocrats, 
Legislature and entire judiciary as if judges of the Supreme Court are mere 
toys. 
 
It will shock our founding father who liberated India after centuries of 
slavery that in few decades just two Ambani and Tata could enslave us 1.15 
billion Indians. 
 
Over Rs.10,000 Per Consumer On Metering 
 
Infrastructure Investment 2002-2007 In Rs. Crores




Item/ Years

BYPL

BRPL

NDPL

G. Total


"B" Items

733

1354

870

2957


Total

1158

1822

1314

4294
 
BRPL/BYPL/NDPL has 2.6 million consumers but in the name of Infrastructure 
development these Discoms invested over 70% of public money on "Accessories" of 
power system like you have music system or leather seat covers etc that 
contributes little to car performance. 
 
Under category "B" items like METERS, SCADA, HVDC, GIS and IT, I don't find 
much capital investment in these except Meters. 
 
Even after extorting Rs.10,000 per consumer under "B" these crooks believe our 
Politicians, Judges and Bureaucrats are all idiots who help them to institute 
false and fabricated cases when actually 25 brand new and accurate meters could 
be provided to each consumer with the king of money fraudulently wasted on 
public account. 
 
With the kind of money I would have provided "Flawless Power System". 
 
But difference in case wasteful expenditure is that consumers shall be billed 
for it in tariff for lifetime. 
 
Over Rs.10,000 per consumer was wasted on basically unproductive investment 
when they actually test checked all consumer meters in first two months itself. 
 
Even more starling is the fact that politicians like Madan Lal Khurana and 
Sheila Dixit promoted corruption and unauthorized and illegal colonies. 
 
On page 5 you will find the T&D losses shot up from 20% to 50% within two years 
from 1992-95 when Madan Lal Khurana became first chief minister of Delhi 
winning on promise of regularizing illegal colonies, industries, shops and 
providing water and electricity. 
 
Are Consumers Terrorists?  
 
In the second document you will find that GOI has provided CISF force to 
professional thugs Ambanis and Tatas. 
 
Apart from raids 20-100 per day when well armed police assist raiding parties 
of discoms FABRICATED bills are raised more than the purchase price of the 
residential properties when no case is made out in case of legal consumers. 
 
Discoms don't consider load factor in assessing load that is only 11% and then 
multiply it with six months at five times normal tariff that eventually case 
400 Times Inflated DAE billing where none exists. 6X5X9X1.5 = 405 – nine times 
load and 1.5 tariff charged at highest tariff slab. 
 
With the kind of money – Rs 3000 crores it would be possible to read and check 
meters every day. Meter readers are paid only 0.40p or just one cent per 
reading. 
 
For 2.6 million consumers daily meter reading cost shall be Rs.10.4million or 
Rs.370 crores annually- interest on Rs.3000 crores plus cost of Terrorist Raids 
would definitely be more. 
 
Bunch of extreme idiots make a fool of our entire system. 
 
75,000 Raids But Only 119 Cases Finalized In Five Years. 
 
Over 75,000 raids were conducted but only 5830 cases of them were referred to 
Special Courts out of that only 119 were finally concluded. 
 
Entire judicial system may have to be engaged to deal with bogus cases. 
 
Ravinder Singh October22, 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Are electricity users consumers, asks SC 
 
TIMES NEWS NETWORK October20, 2007 Delhi P-10 
 
New Delhi: Electricity users probably constitute one of the largest chunks of 
all consumers but the Supreme Court found that the law was not clear whether 
they could move a consumer forum for speedy redressal of disputes with power 
distributors. 
   Looking at the large number of complaints against power distributors by 
electricity users, it asked the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 
(NCDRC) to decide whether consumers of electricity could be classified as 
'consumers' under the Consumer Protection Act (CPA).    
What came in the way of the apex court accepting electricity users as consumers 
was the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003, which bars jurisdiction of civil 
courts from entertaining any disputes relating to power supply to consumers, 
terming them as technical matters. 
   Setting aside an NCDRC verdict which gave relief to a resident of Jharkhand 
by treating him as a consumer of electricity without examining the effect of 
the 2003 law, a Bench comprising Justices Arijit Pasayat and P Sathasivam asked 
NCDRC to examine afresh whether a consumer of electricity was a consumer under 
the CPA. 
   The dilemma before the court was that while section 2(o) of the CPA defined 
service to include any service with regard to banking, financing, insurance, 
transport, processing, supply of electrical energy and entertainment, the 
provisions of Electricity Act, 2003, barred jurisdiction of civil courts in 
matters relating to unauthorised use of electricity, tampering of meters and 
distribution and calibration of meters, these being technical in character. 
   It said, "In view of the fact that the National Commission has not addressed 
the question whether consumers of electricity are covered by the definition of 
'consumer' as defined in Section 2(o) of the Consumer Protection Act, we set 
aside the NCDRC order and remit the matter to the National Commission for a 
positive finding on the aspect." 
 
__________________________________________________Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? 
Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 


__._,_.___ 
Messages in this topic (0) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic 
Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Calendar 

 Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: 
Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group 
| Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe 


Recent Activity


 13
New Members

 1
New FilesVisit Your Group 


Yahoo! Finance
It's Now Personal
Guides, news,
advice & more.

Y! Messenger
Files to share?
Send up to 1GB of
files in an IM.

Best of Y! Groups
Discover groups
that are the best
of their class.
. __,_._,___ 






_________________________________________________________________
Call friends with PC-to-PC calling -- FREE
http://get.live.com/messenger/overview
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to