thats a good one. SOmeone seems to have accepted that it had relevance "once upon a time long long ago..."
Umesh Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >**** That is different from the headline in the >post: " NE extremism has lost relevance" C'da, the above was in response to what you wrote below, and yes, it is different from the headline. >Therefore, one could reasonably surmise that it is quite immaterial whether >Ram Sarangapani or >Sabhapandit Dangoria or the AT have concluded that "extremism" is relevant or >not. It is >DECIDED by those who are in control and whether they would care to resolve the >conflict/s thru a >non-violent process. >Has it? Who decided it has? And if it indeed >has, how come it has not disappeared ? And regarding extremism, does it have to disappear first to see that its becoming irrelevant? Is that the litmus test? OK Let us set aside views of Sabhapandit for the moment. Lets assume he is wrong, like many others before him. But who answers the questions people of Assam may have (that is, if they are relevant)? Those who are shouting hoarse of the importance and relevancy of extremism, might want to explain to the people of Assam, for whom they are fighting, how and why they are relevant, important, and possibily even necessary? On 12/3/07, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I am with you - no one, Shabhapandit, you, me, >or the people of Assam, ---- none of our views >on the >subject is worth a darn! **** That is different from the headline in the post: " NE extremism has lost relevance" Has it? Who decided it has? And if it indeed has, how come it has not disappeared ? Also one must not forget what has NOT been said but implied: That it HAD relevance at one time, just that it no longer has. And if it did, how so? And if it does not anymore what has changed? Just read the ToI Editorial posted by Rajen this morning. Or look at: http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/where-chairman-mao-still-sows-revolution/ What did it say? How does that fit with this verdict of Sabhapandit's? Or is it restricted only to NE India? At 3:49 PM -0600 12/3/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote: >Fair enough, Cda. > > >It is DECIDED by those who are in control and >whether they would care to resolve the >conflict/s thru a >>non-violent process. > >So, who is in control? > >I am with you - no one, Shabhapandit, you, me, >or the people of Assam, ---- none of our views >on the subject is worth a darn! > >--Ram > > > > >On 12/3/07, Chan Mahanta ><<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >At 2:19 PM -0600 12/3/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote: >>Hehehe! >> >>And C'da, whats your conclusion. Again, we are >>not holding our breath (either) :) > > > > >**** That is what we see. > >Sabhapandit or Ram Sarangapani or Chandan Mahanta >do not decide what is relevant and what is not. > >If people have embarked on violent struggles, it >might mean that non-violent means to resolve the >conflict have failed ( unless of course these >people who have gotten involved in violent >conflicts are more interested in courting death >over life). And how is that? One would have to >think that is because those who are in CONTROL >are not about to relent on whatever the object of >the conflict might be. > >Therefore, one could reasonably surmise that it >is quite immaterial whether Ram Sarangapani or >Sabhapandit Dangoria or the AT have concluded >that "extremism" is relevant or not. It is >DECIDED >by those who are in control and whether they >would care to resolve the conflict/s thru a >non-violent >process. > >In that, Sabhapandit's verdict is not worth the >ink printed on, would be my conclusion. > >What would yours be? > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>--Ram >> >> >> >>On 12/3/07, Chan Mahanta >><<mailto:<mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]><mailto:[EMAIL >>PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>wrote: >> >>Whew! >> >>Did not realize I would live to hear of the day. >>Thanks to Sabhapandit Dangoriya's verdict. Those >>of us who have been holding our breath for so >>long now can exhale :-). >> >>But before I do, I have a question: Is it >>Sabhapandit Dangoriyas' conclusion, or is it the >>conclusion of those who don't seem to think so? >>My guess is that would determine the value of the >>verdict, wouldn't one think? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>At 1:34 PM -0500 12/3/07, Sanjib Bhuyan wrote: >>>Please see the news article in Assam Tribune: > >><<< > http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=dec0307/at07>http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=dec0307/at07>< > http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=dec0307/at07> >http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=dec0307/at07><< >http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=dec0307/at07>http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=dec0307/at07 > > >>><http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=dec0307/at07> >>>http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/details.asp?id=dec0307/at07 >>> >>> >>> >>>Also attached as pdf file. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:NE extremism >>>lost relevance.pdf (PDF /«IC») (006A6442) >>_______________________________________________ >>assam mailing list >><mailto:<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]><mailto: >>[email protected]>[email protected] > ><<http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org > >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org><http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org > >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >assam mailing list ><mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] >< >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org>http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org > > > _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org __._,_.___ Messages in this topic (0) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Members | Calendar We appreciate your contribution to Assam Society of America! Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe Visit Your Group Fitness Edge A Yahoo! Group about sharing fitness and endurance goals. Need traffic? Drive customers With search ads on Yahoo! Stay in Shape on Yahoo! Groups Find a fitness Group & get motivated. . __,_._,___ Umesh Sharma Washington D.C. 1-202-215-4328 [Cell] Ed.M. - International Education Policy Harvard Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Class of 2005 http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu info) http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ (Management Info) www.gse.harvard.edu/iep (where the above 2 are used ) http://harvardscience.harvard.edu/ http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/ --------------------------------- Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! for Good _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
