Isn't about time the ST and SC classifications and reservations are removed 
in India? Need to go to a financial relief system based on the economic status 
of a family, ST/SC or not. I feel this will produce a fairer and apolitical 
system to take care of those who need help. I understand many politicians have 
vested interest in maintaining the current system but aren't there even ten MPs 
who would start the movement to make a change?  
   Definition of Oxomiya:  How about making it as simple as - any Indian 
citizen who has lived in Oxom for say 30 years? If there is a possibility that 
some foreigners may pass off as Indian citizens, so be it. Definitely a Marwari 
family doing business in Oxom for 30 years is an Oxomiya. 
    The stalemate in the definition issue is intolerable. This definition will 
automatically include all native hills and plains tribes and tea gardeners (see 
complaints below). All of these people are as much Oxomiya as the Baruahs and 
the Sarmas.

Ravindra Nath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Aboriginal tribals disheartened

KOKRAJHAR, Dec 6: A section of Bodo intellectuals and former Bodoland movement 
leaders observed that the voice of Asomiya intellectuals in support of Adivasis 
has been disheartening for the aboriginal tribals of the State, such as Bodos.

In an interview with The Sentinel, former ABSU leader and co-worker of Bodofa 
UN Brahma, DD Narzary said the Asomiya intellectuals always claimed the 
outsiders and immigrants of other countries as “Asomiyas”, forgetting the 
indigenous people of the State. He said the successive State Governments have 
sympathized wish of outsiders overlooking tribes like Bodos. The intellectuals 
of the State are not serious about the killings of indigenous people, human 
rights violations, gang rape on tribal women and molestation for which justice 
has not been done. He questioned why leaders like AASU advisor Samujjal 
Bhattacharyya refrained from calling Bodos and other indigenous people of Asom 
as Asomiya whereas they do not hesitate to call a Santhali girl as Asomiya. He 
expressed fear and apprehension that the State Government and Asomiya 
intellectuals would be bound to lend their voice to the new ST demand.

Narzary strongly opposed the granting of ST status to six communities saying 
that the communities are well advanced in all respects and they have been 
enjoying political rights and advantages. He said both Adivasis and Rajbongshis 
have Cabinet ministers and good number of legislators in the Assam Assembly 
since long, but the indigenous tribals do not have such advantages. He also 
cautioned both Delhi and Dispur that the tribal would not be responsible for 
another unrest in the region.

MP SK Bwiswmuthiary, while speaking The Sentinel from New Delhi, said the 
granting ST status to outsiders will not only affect the Bodos and other 
tribals, but also the Asomiyas as a whole will lose their rights.

“There will be a new power equation in the State politics if new communities 
are included in the ST list. Political power will not go to the hands of 
genuine Asomiya people because power sharing by outsiders will bring a drastic 
change in the political scenario of the State,” Bwiswmuthiary said.

The MP asked the Government of India and Government of Asom to announce the 
policy of reorganization of the State on a “federal” plan before granting ST 
status to the six-communities, saying that the process of “Balkanization” is 
yet to be completed.

Former president of KDC, ABWWF, Ms Maloti Rani Narzary, in an interview with 
The Sentinel, said the tribals of the State are deprived of all facilities and 
rights. Both the Centre and the State Government, instead of fulfilling the 
demands of the tribal people, are going to accord ST status to the six 
communities ignoring strong opposition from indigenous tribal groups. She also 
attacked the AGP saying that the party opposed the inclusion of more 
communities in the ST list during PK Mahanta’s rule, but the party is now 
favouring ST status to the six communities. This is political opportunism, she 
said.

President of All Assam Tribal Sangha (AATS) Ranjit Kumar Borgoyary told The 
Sentinel that the Sangha had no option other than launching a vigorous movement 
comprising all tribal people of Asom. He accused the State Government for its 
failure to protect the tribal belts and blocks, without filling the back log 
posts lying vacant for many years.

Working president of Federation of Bodo Youth (FBY) Jangshisu Brahma told The 
Sentinel that the federation would oppose the inclusion of six communities into 
the ST list at any cost and that the tribals would be adversely affected by the 
new ST formula for six communities.

We won’t allow Tea Tribes to get ST status: Tribal Sangha

GUWAHATI, Dec 6: The crisis over the issue of ST status to the six communities 
of the State appears to be deepening as seven tribal organizations, including 
the All Assam Tribal Sangha (AATS), have today made it clear that under no 
circumstances they will allow ST status to the Tea Tribe community. The 
organizations have opposed the move to extend the ST list as they believe it 
will jeopardize the interests and political rights of the existing tribal 
population of the State.

Terming the fresh move on the part of the State Government to recommend ST 
status for Tea Tribes to the Centre as a political game of Dispur ahead of the 
panchayat polls, AATS general secretary Aditya Khakhlari, while talking to the 
press here, said: “We won’t sit idle if the interests of the STs in the State 
are affected.”

The leaders of the All Assam Tribal Youth League, Federation of Bodo Youths, 
All Tiwa Students’ Association, Deuri Students’ Association, Karbi Students’ 
Association and the Dimasa Students’ Union were also present at the press 
conference. Khakhlari said the Beltola incident that was triggered by the 
unruly behaviour of the Adivasi activists was, in fact, a conspiracy on the 
part of the State Government. He said, despite Union Home Minister Shivraj 
Patil’s statement in Parliament that the Tea Tribes of Asom have lost their 
tribal characteristics, the State Government is taking a fresh initiative to 
recognize the community as ST so as to garner votes. Even most of the political 
parties and organizations, including AASU, are trying to appease the Tea Tribes 
by ignoring the interest of the indigenous people of Asom, he added.

“When the Karbis, Man and Tai-speaking people in plain areas and Bodos in the 
hill areas are not yet recognized as STs, how can Tea Tribes, who came to Asom 
from other States, get ST status?” Khakhlari questioned. On the demand for ST 
status from other indigenous communities like the Koch-Rajbongshis and 
Tai-Ahoms, Khakhlari said the Traibal Sangha wants a fresh revision of the ST 
List. According to him, the communities, who would get ST status, have to 
fulfil five criteria —indication of primitive traits, geographical isolation, 
lack of contact with other communities, distinctive culture, and backwardness.

It may be mentioned here that tribal leaders of the State want economic package 
for the six communities instead of according them ST status. They also rejected 
the alternative formula to shift the existing 27 per cent of OBC quota to ST 
quota by including the six agitating communities in the ST list.

The seven organizations will observe their demand day on December 17 by 
submitting memorandum to the Chief Minister through DCs and SDOs. 
http://www.sentinelassam.com



Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/assamonline/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/assamonline/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to