Patharughat: the land of unsung heroes
  
— Mayukh Goswami
   
  January 28, 1894 is an indelible black spot in the history of British rule in 
India for the organised massacre at Patharughat in Darrang where about 140 
innocent peasants took the bullets on their chest. After 26 years on April 13, 
1919, history repeated at North West India with mass killings at Jalianwalabag 
in Amritsar, Punjab.

Rule and exploitation were the two main objectives of the British power. They 
failed to understand the people, they were going to rule over. The rebates and 
exemptions enjoyed by the people of Darrang under Koch-Ahom regime, were 
suddenly halted by the British administration to the utter dissatisfaction, 
resentment and frustration of the people. In 1832-33 AD the British rule 
imposed plough tax at Rs 2 each per annum at Darrang. It continued till 1841. 
In 1842 novel land survey was conducted and land was classified into three 
categories for fixing revenue rate: (i) Bustee: high land for homestead - Re 1 
per Pura (4 Bigha) per annum, (ii) Rupit: Cultivable low land – Rs 1.50 per 
Pura per annum and (iii) Faringati: high land fit for Rabi crop – Re 1 per Pura 
per annum.

During the next twenty years, repeated land surveys were conducted and revenue 
enhancement continued accordingly. A sense of suspicion and apprehension used 
to cripple in the minds of the farmers for such conspirated design of the 
British ruler. This feeling spread among the people every where. Finally a 
decision was taken that the people as a single united force, would express 
their grievances and apprehensions at the office of the Tehsildar of 
Patharughat for sympathetic consideration of the administration at the earliest.

On a day in 1868, after seven years of the Phulaguri Dhawa of Nagaon, the first 
peasant revolt of Assam, thousand of public from Darrang as per earlier 
decision gathered in front of the Patharughat Tehsildar’s Office to express 
their grievances. Apprehending disturbance, AC Comber, the deputy commissioner 
of Darrang along with SP and SDO Mangaldai rushed from Tezpur to Patharughat 
Tehsal Office. The British administration did not pay considerable attention to 
the public resentment, causing excitement among the gathering. The agitated 
gathering was advancing towards the “White Sahibs” to press their grievances. 
Terrified and bewildered, the “Sahibs” brought themselves back into the Dak 
Bungalow. The advancing crowd shouted at them, some one even proposed to set 
the Dak bungalow ablaze but the leader could control the situation. The 
gathering dispersed quietly with more determination.

Twenty five years elapsed without any notable disturbance in the district. In 
1893 the then Chief Commissioner of Assam, Williamson Ward took the initiative 
to raise the revenue. This made the public irked and the volcano of stored 
unsteadiness erupted and the public firmly settled that revenue would not be 
cleared until an acceptable solution was found out. On January 26, 1894, in 
Patharughat Raijmel, it was reaffirmed that revenue would not be paid at the 
enhanced rate at any cost. Tehsildar Bhabani Charan Bhattacharya (Tezpur) of 
Patharughat Circle entreated the huge gathering to wait till January 28 when 
the deputy commissioner of Darang, Anderson would be available for hearing the 
public grievances directly.

In the meantime the Government received intelligence report about the 
preparation of agitations at a regular basis. To face the situation, security 
measures were taken up in a cautious and compact manner. On the report of 
Tehsildar of Patharughat, it was decided at the high level that along with the 
deputy commissioner of Darrang SP Darrang, Barrington and SDO of Mangaldoi, 
Ramson would proceed to Patharughat on January 28 with armed forces.

January 28 was a normal weekly bazaar day. Public began to throng the open 
field in front of the Dak Bangalow from the early morning. At noon, the field 
became just like a sea of people, mostly comprising poor farmers, in their 
usual scanty wearing, bare footed, bare handed. At about noon the trio of 
“White Sahibs” arrived at Patharughat on horse back along with a dozen of armed 
white soldiers and 19 native police men marched to Patharughat. Straightway 
they entered the Dak Bungalow, as they were greeted with slogans by the crowd. 
The Tehsildar with his staff and the Umedar Dhajar Ali Fandi, waited outside, 
not being taken into confidence, simply remained as silent on lookers. On the 
otherside, not being taken into confidence, simply remained as silent on 
lockers. On the otherside, the patience of the public was tested as after long 
expectation the awaiting crowd was faced by the “Sahibs” surrounded by armed 
guards. The Deputy Commissioner, Anderson straightly refused to
 pay heed to the public complaints, saying that they were not the authority to 
make changes in the rates of revenue fixed by the queen of England. As the 
Sahibs were about to return to the Dak Bungalow, the bewildered mass, at its 
wit’s end, uttered, “If so, what is the need to come down to Patharughat 
covering long distances.” Then arguments and counter arguments followed. The 
aggrieved crowd was stepping towards the “Sahibs”. The bodyguards stopped them 
roughly. More irritated, the peasants continued to proceed. At this, the 
Superintendent of Police, Barrington gestured to the armed police force. The 
riflemen started hitting in-discriminately. Some say Thoga Baidya of Biahpara 
or Fukolu Sheikh of Athiabari somehow availed a chance to hit on the head of 
the Police super leading to bleeding from the wound. This provoked the enraged 
DC to order – “Hat Jao, Bhag Jao, Fire.” Triggers were pressed instantly, 
peasants in front fell down dead, seriously injured – heads crushed,
 belly bursted, limbs torn apart, bodies smeared with blood, pain and unrest 
every where. Undaunted, the crowd also advanced with whatever available in hand 
– clod, bamboo roots, sticks, branches of tree and used these as missiles on 
the gunmen. They met the same fate as their fore runners. None retreated but 
took the bullets on the chests. Nobody knew how many of them died, rotting to 
be consumed by jackals and vultures. None was allowed to attend the dead or 
wounded to identify and to take care of. For those who escaped but were 
partners of the protest, those who returned from hospital, fined and jailed 
were reluctant to reveal the fact for fear of life. Later it came to light that 
the number of deaths stood around 140 and that of the injured was at least 150.

Their martyrdom is the bench mark in the history of struggle for freedom of 
India. Their names should adorn the pages of history in golden letters. But 
unfortunately most of the people of our State, not to speak of the country and 
the world, are still in the darkness about the Patharughat massacre unlike the 
incident at Jalianwalabag in Punjab which got wide publicity.
Assam Tribune Editorial 28.01.08

       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to