From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:44:45 -0700Subject: [WaterWatch] A 
tougher stand by India on Tibet?




A tougher stand by India on Tibet?We are following the doctrine of 
expediencyThe Indian position on Tibet is muted but based on its traditional 
opposition to separatist movements and the belief that these should be 
internally negotiated without external intervention. India’s sensitivities are 
based on its own experience in Kashmir and the Northeast.China is a 
particularly sensitive issue and India had committed that the Tibetan refugees 
and their government in exile would “not indulge in political activity” that 
would be against China. India has thus urged that differences between the two 
be negotiated and resolved peacefully, without accusing China of rights 
violations.The western countries have accused China of genocide and human 
rights violations. The west has selectively used human rights to intervene, 
topple regimes, and apply sanctions. So, for example, it censures China, but 
ignores violations in Iraq, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.The Dalai Lama has taken a 
wise and principled position that endorses Tibet as part of China. He has 
opposed any violence by the Tibetans, advocated restraint, asked for 
negotiations and even threatened to resign as political leader if the violence 
continues. He has appealed to China to stop the cultural oppression of the 
Tibetan minorities.India is caught in the horns of a dilemma between the 
principles of morality as opposed to the doctrine of expediency. India has 
signed a ‘Global Democracy Initiative’ with the US. When the principality of 
Kosovo seceded and declared independence from Serbia in violation of 
international law, India did not oppose this outright but said that they were 
‘to further study the legal implications.’ India should take a tougher stand on 
human rights violations world over, but cannot do so as long as it violates 
human rights in its own regions of insurgencies.Democracies should take a more 
consistent stand on the rights of minorities, including those who want a 
political rearrangement. But for this it is imperative that the international 
community stays steadfast on principled positions and not be silent on Iraq 
while criticising China. With the Dalai Lama strongly coming out for a 
negotiated settlement and repeatedly clarifying that Tibet is part of China, 
the way for negotiations is clear.Anuradha ChenoyProfessorSchool of 
International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU)ET__._,_.___ 
Messages in this topic (2) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic 
Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Calendar 

 Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: 
Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group 
| Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe 



Recent Activity


 13
New Members

 5
New FilesVisit Your Group 


Yahoo! Finance
It's Now Personal
Guides, news,
advice & more.

All-Bran
10 Day Challenge
Join the club and
feel the benefits.

Yahoo! Groups
Join a program
to help you find
balance in your life.
. __,_._,___ 






_________________________________________________________________
Tried the new MSN Messenger? It’s cool! Download now.
http://messenger.msn.com/Download/Default.aspx?mkt=en-in
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to