In short, why not India just give in to everybody's 'khwab'?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
“In order to make spiritual progress you must be patient like a tree and humble 
like a blade of grass.”
 
 
 
 

> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:06:17 -0500> To: [email protected]> From: [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Assam] Fwd: Re: Los Angeles Times on Northeast 
> India> > > >I don't know why govt. of India could not win over B'desh to get 
> the transit> >rights. Every time a new government takes charge, we 
> enthusiastically talk> >of a favorable climate; every time the same story 
> repeats. We are also> >reluctant to take any mediator who could show reasons 
> and objectivity to> B'desh.> > > > > **** Nor do many others Manoj. It is 
> India's inability to change from > the rut it has created for itself, a mind 
> set that it cannot change. > The same mind-set that does not bend to respond 
> to the needs of their > fellow men, while holding on to dogmas and 
> self-imposed 'rules' that > they hold sacrosanct and infallible producing 
> results like:> > *** Bhopal tragedy victims --who got little , while the > 
> rulers held onto hopes for imprisoning> Union Carbide CEO.> > *** Holding on 
> to the real estate of Kashmir while gladly > sacrificing hundreds of 
> thousands> of their own people's lives.> > *** Annihilating hundreds of 
> thousands Nagas, Mizos, Oxomiyas > and other kins of ours> but holding on to 
> the real-estate without a flexible or > sincere approach towards a political> 
> settlement.> > *** Letting the people of the NE suffer the consequences of > 
> depriving the Brahmaputra> waterway for navigation to satisfy its needs to be 
> 'tough' > with them Miyas of B'desh.> > *** Unable to reform its 
> dysfunctional institutions of state > like the 'bureaucratic system', its 
> law> enforcement , its laws and its courts and system of justice, > its 
> electoral system, its> educational systems, its public health system, ad 
> nauseum.> > One can go on and on.> > And our intelligentsia, remains ignorant 
> and apathetic.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 9:56 PM +0530 6/3/08, 
> Manoj Das wrote:> >Hi C-da> >> >I really don't understand this diplomacy 
> much! But what I understand is> >that, at large, a nation has to behave like 
> a good conscientious citizen in> >the comity. It has to be strong yet 
> compassionate, shrewd yet considerate,> >should know how to use "*xam dam 
> dondo bhed*" to achieve its goals of> >national interest.> >> >I don't know 
> why govt. of India could not win over B'desh to get the transit> >rights. 
> Every time a new government takes charge, we enthusiastically talk> >of a 
> favorable climate; every time the same story repeats. We are also> >reluctant 
> to take any mediator who could show reasons and objectivity to> >B'desh.> >> 
> >-mkd> >> >> >On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> wrote:> >> >>> >> > >International diplomacy requires more than 
> just dialog. India is not a> >> good> >> >brother in its neighborhood; 
> disliked by everyone..we may blame> >> conveniently> >> on foreign hand..:)> 
> >>> >>> >> *** Exactly! And thus B'desh "FRUSTRATING" India's attempts at> >> 
> opening up navigation is not an accurate portrayal of the situation,> >> is 
> it? It is an attempt to portray B'desh as the bad-guys here. That> >> is why 
> I asked the question I did.> >>> >> That however is NOT to be construed as my 
> holding up B'desh as the> >> GOOD guys, as some will surely do. The point is, 
> as you say,> >> "---International diplomacy requires more than just dialog". 
> There> >> have to be gives and takes.> >>> >> Question is what has India DONE 
> in that front? Has "democratic" India> >> EVER shared with its people, what 
> it has offered B'desh, for what ;> >> or what B'desh demanded for what, so 
> that a public dialog can ensue,> >> or so the public can gauge its rulers' 
> SINCERITY in these> >> 'negotiations'?> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> At 9:47 AM 
> +0530 6/3/08, Manoj Das wrote:> >> >C-da> >> >> >> >Well, Govt. of India has 
> been holding talks with Bangladeshi counterparts> >> >through direct 
> channel.. Bangladesh could never forgive India for the> >> >Farakka barrage.> 
> >> >> >> >International diplomacy requires more than just dialog. India is 
> not a> >> good> >> >brother in its neighborhood; disliked by everyone..we may 
> blame> >> conveniently> >> >on foreign hand..:)> >> >> >> >mkd> >> >> >> >On 
> Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> wrote:> >> 
> >> >> >> M:> >> >>> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> > > Number one is Bangladesh, which 
> is> >> >> >constantly frustrating India's efforts to get transit through the 
> male> >> >> river> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> *** What do we know 
> about what INDIA has been doing to get B'deshi> >> >> co-operation to get 
> river access to Assam and the region ?> >> >>> >> >> Has Indian govt. told us 
> what it has been doing all these decades,> >> >> and how B' or why B'desh has 
> been FRUSTRATING it?> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> As you can imagine, these efforts 
> always involve give and take. Just> >> >> demands and/or intimidation does 
> not bring results. Have Indian> >> >> officialdom ever brought the people 
> into confidence and shared their> >> >> negotiating stances and the B'deshi 
> responses ?> >> >>> >> >> I am sure the people of Assam would want to know 
> that. Wouldn't you?> >> >>> >> >> c-da> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> 
> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> At 9:41 AM +0530 
> 6/2/08, Manoj Das wrote:> > > >> >I was thinking this all along!> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >When I shared this news with a Japanese thinker from ADB, he was> >> 
> stunned..> >> >> >There are many players in this. Number one is Bangladesh, 
> which is> >> >> >constantly frustrating India's efforts to get transit 
> through the male> >> >> >river. Secondly a grand politics of undermining 
> Assam's destined> >> position> >> >> as> >> >> >the land bridge between giant 
> Asian land and economic masses.> >> >> >> >> >> >mkd> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Dilip&Dil Deka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> >> 
> wrote:> >> >> >> >> >> >> Forwarding.> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Dilip&Dil Deka 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008> >> >> >> 20:58:13 -0700 
> (PDT)> >> >> >> From: Dilip&Dil Deka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> >> >> Subject: 
> Re: [Assam] Los Angeles Times on Northeast India> >> >> >> To: [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Dear Sanjib,> >> >> >> You 
> said, "But are they producing or is it only assembling> >> products.> >> >> 
> I> >> >> >> don't know the answer. "> >> >> >> Even Assembling products is 
> better than not doing anything. Mexico> >> is> >> >> >> making a lot of money 
> assembling products for USA. Assembling> >> products> >> >> >> eventually 
> leads to local production if the local entrepreneurs> >> mean to> >> >> take> 
> >> >> >> part in the process.> >> >> >> Car battery industry is a good 
> example. As I understand, back in> >> >> seventies> >> >> >> batteries were 
> assembled in Assam. I heard that most of the parts> >> are> >> >> now> >> >> 
> >> made in Assam. Is it true?> >> >> >> Dilipda> >> >> >>> >> >> >> [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED] wrote:> >> >> >> Dear Dilipda and Mahanta,> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 
> Good hearing from you. I am skeptical, as Mahanta has noted. But> >> not> >> 
> >> >> because a lot new is not taking place -- but because things that> >> 
> are> >> >> >> crucial for a breakthrough are not happenning. There is a much 
> more> >> > > >> affluent India, and many in Delhi are genuinely committed to 
> doing> >> >> >> more. So if earlier we talked about 100 crores, now the 
> language is> >> of> >> >> >> 1000 crores. But is money enough? Domestic 
> policy and foreign> >> policy> >> > > >> cannot be separated when it comes to 
> Northeast India. Our> >> relations> >> >> >> with China may be improving in 
> many ways, but not when it comes to> >> >> >> Arunchal Pradesh. Only last 
> summer China has begun referring to AP> >> as> >> >> >> China's Southern 
> Tibet. So long as the Burmese military regime is> >> >> >> there, huge amount 
> of foreign funds are not going to move in to> >> build> >> >> >> 
> infrastructure in Burma. Indian money or Chinese money can do a> >> little> 
> >> >> >> bit of this and that, but not the funds that could be mobilized for> 
> >> >> >> Northeast india to benefit from India's Look East policy. No matter> 
> >> >> >> how much we shout about Bangladesh's animosity, the burden of> >> 
> normal> >> >> >> relations is on the bigger neighbour as in all such cases of 
> a> >> country> >> >> >> that is far more resourceful than the aggreived 
> smaller neighbor.> >> We> >> >> >> may be landocked by India, said a 
> Bangladeshi foreign minister, but> >> >> >> Northeast india is landlocked by 
> us. So the military man's vision> > > of> >> >> >> the Look East policy -- 
> linking up with the Burmese or the> >> Bangaldeshi> >> >> >> army to get 
> support for their anti-insurgency operations--is a very> >> >> >> poor 
> substitute to the huge leap of resources -- material as well> >> as> >> >> >> 
> intellectual -- that is needed for the task. At the same time I am> >> >> >> 
> willing to say that we do not know the implications of some of the> >> >> >> 
> huge amount of money that is being spent. There are about 15 daily> >> >> >> 
> flights from Delhi to Guwahati -- more than any other comparable> >> city.> 
> >> >> > > There is much more energetic road-building (and the massive> >> >> 
> >> disappearance of trees and of the familiar surroundings around the> >> >> 
> >> trunk road) etc etc. I know the planes carry many businessmen> >> taking> 
> >> >> >> advantage of the tax benefits of investing in the region. But are> 
> >> they> >> >> >> producing or is it only assembling products. I don't know 
> the> > > answer.> >> >> >> But we surely need a new language to talk about 
> the region --> >> >> >> certainty "neglect" is not what is happenning any 
> more.> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Hope all is well.> >> >> >>> >> >> >> With warm 
> regards,> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Sanjib> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Quoting 
> Chan Mahanta :> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Thanks for sharing the article Baruah.> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > But I share your skepticism. We have heard these for 
> decades on> >> end> >> >> >> > now. The politicians attempt to take credit 
> for imaginary> >> >> >> > achievements and establishment spokespersons paint 
> rosy> >> scenarios, in> >> >> >> > the air. But what has the reality been?> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > m> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > At 8:33 
> PM -0400 5/30/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> 
> http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-india29-2008may29,0,6712115.story> >> 
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> From the Los Angeles Times> >> >> >> >> Northeast India 
> is poised to tap economic potential> >> >> >> >> The eight-state area plans 
> multiple projects to increase its> >> trade> >> >> >> >> with Southeast 
> Asia.> >> >> >> >> By Shankhadeep Choudhury> >> >> >> >> Los Angeles Times 
> Staff Writer> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> May 29, 2008> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> 
> NEW DELHI - India's remote northeast region has been both> >> blessed> >> >> 
> and> >> >> >> >> cursed by its geography. The region is rich in natural 
> resources> >> but> >> >> >> >> is landlocked and surrounded by China, 
> Myanmar, Bangladesh and> >> >> Bhutan,> >> >> >> >> leaving it impoverished.> 
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> The eight-state region may finally get a chance to 
> start living> >> up> >> >> to> >> >> >> >> its economic potential with 
> several projects to enhance> >> connections> >> >> >> >> with Southeast Asia 
> and to increase outlets for such commodities> >> as> >> >> >> >> organic 
> foods, orchids, tea, coal and oil.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Now, the only 
> way to move major quantities of goods between> >> >> northeast> >> >> >> >> 
> India and Southeast Asia is through Bangladesh.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> But 
> authorities in Myanmar and India are nearing final approval> >> of a> >> >> 
> >> >> $100-million river project giving northeast India direct access> >> to> 
> >> > > the> >> >> >> >> Indian Ocean through Myanmar, said Abhijit Barooah, 
> chairman of> >> the> >> >> >> >> northeastern chapter of the Confederation of 
> Indian Industry,> >> >> India's> >> >> >> >> premier business association.> 
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> The project envisages facilitating movement of cargo 
> from> >> India's> >> > > >> >> Mizoram state to Myanmar's port at Sittwe, via 
> the Kaladan> >> River.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> In addition, talks have 
> begun between companies in northeast> >> India> >> >> and> >> >> >> >> 
> Thailand after a trade-promotion conference in Bangkok in> >> October,> >> >> 
> >> >> said Lemli Loyi, assistant general manager at the state-run> >> North> 
> >> >> >> >> Eastern Development Finance Corp. Loyi expressed hope that the> 
> >> talks> >> >> >> >> would result in increased business and possible joint 
> ventures.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> India first enunciated a "look east" 
> policy, an economic and> > > >> strategic> >> >> >> >> orientation toward 
> Southeast Asia, in 1992. It had its genesis> >> at> >> >> the> >> >> >> >> 
> end of the Cold War, after the collapse of the Soviet Union.> >> Having> >> 
> >> >> >> lost the Soviet economic and political support on which it had> >> 
> >> relied,> >> >> >> >> the Indian government embarked on a program of 
> free-market> >> >> >> >> restructuring at home and sought new markets and 
> economic> >> partners> >> >> >> >> abroad.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> 
> Officials envisaged that the eight northeast states -- Assam,> >> >> >> >> 
> Meghalaya, Manipur, Nagaland, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Tripura> >> and> >> 
> >> >> >> Mizoram -- would emerge as a trading hub for two dynamic regions> >> 
> >> >> >> connected by a network of highways, railways, pipelines and> >> >> 
> >> >> transmission lines. The region is home to about 40 million> >> people.> 
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> But progress has been slow. The region's isolation 
> dates to the> > > >> 1800s.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> "Nineteenth-century 
> British colonial decisions to draw lines> >> between> >> >> >> >> the hills 
> and the plains, to put barriers on trade between> >> Bhutan> >> >> and> >> >> 
> >> >> Assam, and to treat Burma as a buffer against French Indochina> >> and> 
> >> >> >> >> China severed the region from its traditional trade routes --> >> 
> the> >> >> >> >> southern trails of the Silk Road," said Sanjib Baruah, a> >> 
> professor> >> >> of> >> >> >> >> political science at Bard College in New 
> York and an expert on> >> >> > > >> northeast India.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 
> >> The British built railways and roads mostly to take tea, coal,> >> oil> >> 
> >> and> >> >> >> >> other resources out of Assam and into the rest of India 
> and also> >> to> >> >> >> >> Europe.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> The problems 
> increased with the partitioning of India and> >> Pakistan> >> >> in> >> >> >> 
> >> 1947. Bangladesh broke away from Pakistan in the 1970s.> >> >> >> >>> >> 
> >> >> >> Barooah said trade would be boosted by an expected move by the> >> 
> >> Indian> >> >> >> >> and Myanmar governments to expand the list of mostly> 
> >> agricultural> >> >> >> >> commodities allowed to be traded by land between 
> northeast India> >> and> >> >> >> >> Myanmar, from 27 to 42 items.> >> >> >> 
> >>> >> >> >> >> "The northeast is the closest land mass connecting the 
> dynamic> >> >> >> >> economies of south and Southeast Asia," said Pradyut 
> Bordoloi,> >> >> Assam's> >> >> >> >> minister for power and industries. 
> "Besides deep-rooted cultural> >> >> >> >> linkages, we can reap 
> multidimensional benefits in this era of> >> >> >> >> regional economic 
> cooperation."> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Bordoloi is closely associated with a 
> campaign to reopen the> >> World> >> >> War> >> >> >> >> II-era Stillwell 
> Road, connecting Assam's town of Ledo to> >> southwest> >> >> >> >> China.> 
> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> "If reopened, this would be the shortest surface 
> route to Yunnan> >> >> >> >> province of China and other Southeast Asian 
> countries hooking> >> onto> >> >> the> >> >> >> >> trans-Asian highways," he 
> said.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> The road served as the supply line into China 
> during Japan's> >> wartime> >> >> >> >> occupation, but it was shut after 
> India's independence from> >> Britain> >> >> in> >> >> >> >> 1947.> >> >> >> 
> >>> >> >> >> >> Bordoloi said his campaign to reopen the road, initiated 
> after> >> he> >> >> >> >> became a state legislator in 1998, scored a victory 
> when India> >> >> >> >> upgraded the road to a full-fledged national highway, 
> developing> >> it> >> >> up> >> >> >> >> to the Indo-Myanmar border.> >> >> 
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Officials say infrastructure development, power, 
> bamboo-based> >> > > >> >> industries, orchids and organic foods are 
> prospective areas of> >> >> >> >> cooperation with Southeast Asian countries 
> such as Thailand.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> But significant hurdles remain, 
> including concerns that booming> >> >> trade> >> >> >> >> relations may fuel 
> rises in insurgency, narco-terrorism and> >> AIDS,> >> > > all> >> >> >> >> 
> of which plague the northeast. Security in the region is tight,> >> with> >> 
> >> >> >> the army out in force to combat armed groups battling for> > > 
> greater> >> >> >> >> autonomy or independence from India.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> 
> >> >> "The official restrictions that prevail in northeast India -- in> >> >> 
> terms> >> >> >> >> of travel, land and labor markets -- are hardly conducive 
> to> >> >> intensive> >> >> >> >> cross-border economic relations," said 
> Baruah, the political> >> science> >> >> >> >> professor.> >> >> >> >>> >> >> 
> >> >> "Both the reality of insurgencies in the region and the security> >> >> 
> >> >> anxiety of the government of India . . . are major obstacles to> >> >> 
> >> >> dynamic cross-border economic ties," he added, calling current> >> >> 
> efforts> >> >> >> >> hardly more than "a bare beginning."> >> >> >> >>> >> >> 
> >> >> Also, Baruah said, it was difficult to imagine a big increase in> >> >> 
> trade> >> >> >> >> given the political situation in military-led Myanmar.> >> 
> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> India's relations with China, a country it has long 
> regarded> >> with> > > >> >> >> distrust since a 1962 border war, would also 
> have to become much> >> >> more> >> >> >> >> relaxed, Baruah said.> >> >> >> 
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> 
> _______________________________________________> >> >> >> >> assam mailing 
> list> >> >> >> >> [email protected]> >> >> >> >> 
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________> >> >> >> > 
> assam mailing list> >> >> >> > [email protected]> >> >> >> > 
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 
> _______________________________________________> >> >> >> assam mailing list> 
> >> >> >> [email protected]> >> >> >> 
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >--> >> >> >Manoj Kumar Das> >> >> >C 172 GF, 
> Sarvodaya Enclave> >> >> >New Delhi 17 India> >> >> >0091 9312650558 (HP) 
> 9910972654> >> >> >_______________________________________________> >> >> 
> >assam mailing list> >> >> >[email protected]> >> >> 
> >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> 
> _______________________________________________> >> >> assam mailing list> >> 
> >> [email protected]> >> >> 
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> >> >>> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >--> >> >Manoj Kumar Das> >> >C 172 GF, Sarvodaya Enclave> >> >New 
> Delhi 17 India> >> >0091 9312650558 (HP) 9910972654> >> 
> >_______________________________________________> >> >assam mailing list> >> 
> >[email protected]> >> 
> >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> >>> >>> >> 
> _______________________________________________> >> assam mailing list> >> 
> [email protected]> >> 
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> >>> >> >> >> >--> 
> >Manoj Kumar Das> >C 172 GF, Sarvodaya Enclave> >New Delhi 17 India> >0091 
> 9312650558 (HP) 9910972654> >_______________________________________________> 
> >assam mailing list> >[email protected]> 
> >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> > > 
> _______________________________________________> assam mailing list> 
> [email protected]> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_________________________________________________________________
Instantly invite friends from Facebook and other social networks to join you on 
Windows Live™ Messenger.
https://www.invite2messenger.net/im/?source=TXT_EML_WLH_InviteFriends
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to