Ripun Borah episode and its significance

— Dr Akhil Ranjan Dutta
 
The education Minister of Assam, Ripun Bora was arrested on June 3, 2008 in New 
Delhi in the alleged case of bribing a CBI official. It happened in a dramatic 
way. The euphoria of the successful completion of two years in power of the 
Tarun Gogoi-led BPPF government in Assam that celebrated the anniversary on May 
25, 2008 was not yet over. The opposition was virtually put into a state of mum 
by the Government with series of sops announced on the eve of the anniversary 
and also the subsequent announcement of the constitution of the New Pay 
Commission under the chairmanship of Bhaskar Baruah. The middle class, 
particularly the salaried section in the State was virtually forgetful of the 
high inflation and insecurity arising out of it amidst the announcements like 
increase of DA to 97 per cent and an interim relief fund of 10 per cent of the 
basic pay till the new Pay Commission comes up with its recommendations. To be 
precise, the Government was in a safer
 side despite its failure on almost all fundamental duties like law and order 
and also rendering the very basic services to the people. The North Cachar 
Autonomous Council episode unfolded and ended without attracting wrath of the 
public despite the dirty game played by the autonomous council and that of the 
State government around the issue of massacre carried out by the DHD (J), 
popularly known as the Black Widow. The sensation created by the resignation of 
the Gauhati University Vice-Chancellor Prof Amarjyoti Choudhury and the 
subsequent act of taking over charge of the University administration by the 
Chancellor, the Governor of Assam Ajai Singh was also slowing down. As 
instructed by the Chief Minister, the Ministers were busy in bringing out huge 
and costly advertisements in the newspapers and electronic media focusing on 
the success stories of the respective ministries. There was no public 
initiative to scrutinise the tall and false claims. Tarun
 Gogoi, encircled by the most trusted trio – Himanta Biswa Sarmah, Rockybul 
Hussain and Ripun Borah and his best smile in face roaming around through big 
hoardings and colourful advertisements.

It was amidst these happy moments that one of the trio within the Tarun Gogoi 
Ministry Ripun Borah, the Education Minister of the State, was caught in broad 
daylight by CBI while bribing one of its officials. As reported, the intention 
behind the bribing was to escape from the alleged involvement of Borah in the 
murder of his political rival Daniel Topno at his constituency in Gohpur in 
2000. Two others, one businessman and a news paper reporter were also arrested 
in the same case. People have known and heard about corruption and bribing of 
many public officials including the ministers. But a minister bribing a cbi 
official was something extraordinary that people hardly can imagine. The 
episode reminds us about the increasing vulnerability of political institutions 
and political competition. Therefore, it is pertinent to read the whole episode 
critically from relevant political angles.

The incident of bribing of a CBI official underscores the almost confirmed 
involvement of Ripun Borah in the Daniel Topno murder case. If it really had 
happened then we are surely back into a state of feudal barbarism in political 
competition. We can no longer be complacent of the fact that such barbarism is 
a monopoly of Northern India – the homelands of feudalism. It also underscores 
the fact that the line between political competition and political revenge 
resulting in political murder is becoming extremely thin.

The rare adventure of bribing a CBI official by a minister signifies the gross 
vulnerability of political and public institutions in Assam. Within the trio of 
the Tarun Gogoi ministry Ripun Borah was perceived as relatively clean, 
transparent and less corrupt. But, a minister handling the Education portfolio 
and coming out open to challenge a Vice-Chancellor of a University forcing him 
to resign was supposed to have some political ethics and morality. A minister, 
who used to sit in the offices of the Directorate of Education at Kahilipara, 
Guwahati at least once a week with proclaimed intention of doing away with 
corruption, has now proved to be a big drama. It could now be well understood 
that he was rather patronising corruption to earn extra money to bribe others 
whenever and wherever necessary to sustain his political show. Unfortunately 
Ripun Borah is not alone in this mission. Most of us are involved directly or 
indirectly in the mission undertaken
 by Ripun Borah. It is an open secret that the college teachers are forced to 
give bribes to the officials at Directorate of Higher Education for receiving 
approval of appointments, confirmation of appointments and also financial 
approval. 

This episode has also unfolded the myth of ‘simplicity’; ‘fairness’ and 
‘transparency’ in social and political dealings of the Chief Minister of the 
State. It is hardly difficult to understand that a Chief Minister encircled by 
corrupt political managers cannot be non-corrupt and transparent. Ripun Borah 
must have bribed the Assam Police and the Chief Minister’s Vigilance cell with 
knowledge and permission of the Chief Minister. The sanctity of the office of 
the Chief Minister and the departments under him are now under eyes of big 
public suspect.

The reliability and credibility of the fourth estate of democracy i.e. media 
will now be questioned more after the Ripun Borah episode where a journalist 
from a reputed news paper played the key role in mediating the act of bribing. 
It is high time that the media itself follows the norms of journalism including 
salary and other allowances and develop strict internal vigilance over the 
movement and activities of its own staff. Nexus between politicians and media 
could result in the sort of devastation that people are afraid even of 
imagining.

The role of the opposition has been most disappointing during the past few 
years. It was all in silence when people have been suffering from high price 
rise in essential commodities and other problems arising out of the 
mal-governance at different fronts. Series of corruption have been exposed 
through RTI. But the opposition preferred to take recourse in silence. May be 
more use of it will dig their graves too. There has been no plan on the part of 
the opposition to encircle the government around these failures in the ensuing 
interim burget session. Suddenly they have picked up the Ripun Borah episode 
and is creating a hue and cry. There is an apprehension that the government 
will convert this crisis into an opportunity by diverting people’s attention 
from failure in governance to ‘one man episode’ where the government has done 
its very basic responsibility by dropping him from the ministry.

The important question that we need to ask is whether the Ripun episode is an 
isolated incident altogether. It is certainly not. This is a product of a 
particular historical and political setting that we have been put into. It is a 
moment where everything is considered as commodity and the sanctity of 
political or public institutions is hardly respected. This is indeed the gift 
of the neo-liberal economic policies pursued by the Indian state for around two 
decades now. Under this neo-liberal regime the government no longer remains a 
public institution and public affairs respectively. It is under these 
circumstances that we are gradually transiting back to barbaric feudalism in 
new forms and styles both in personal and public affairs. Therefore it is a 
structural crisis that we are confronting today. Solution to the crisis will 
also invite structural changes. It now depends on how do we plan and act for 
such a structural change.
(The writer is a Reader in Peace and Conflict Studies in the Department of 
Political Science, Gauhati University).


      
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to