This is a fairly well-written piece that captures the situation in Wisconsin and in rust-belt, labor union, collective burgaining rights etc.This seems to be real ominous. Now, the decline in internal and overseas profits seem to pit the state and the working class against each other, a problem a rich country like America was insulated from so far showing Marx in poor light. On the rebound, the spur applied to a perception that tax payers are paying for salary and pension of the state employees in the backdrop of a low marale due to recession threatens a schism among the citizens themselves.
============from Los Angeles Times======= latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-union-power-20110219,0,7936885.story latimes.com Labor union stronghold rethinking its position The bill proposed in Wisconsin to remove collective bargaining rights from government workers is similar to measures advancing in other Rust Belt states. Such battles are part of a nationwide backlash. By Nicholas Riccardi, Los Angeles Times 7:58 PM PST, February 18, 2011 The nation's Rust Belt once ran on union power, its factories and steel mills employing Democratic-voting union members who got regular pay raises and good pensions. Now the region is at the vanguard of a national backlash against organized labor, as newly elected Republican governors and legislatures try to control costs by weakening - or virtually eliminating - unions of government workers. In Wisconsin on Friday, there was no end in sight to an impasse that paralyzed state government, as Democratic legislators vowed to stay out of the state to defeat an attempt by Gov. Scott Walker to remove collective bargaining rights from government workers. Tens of thousands of protesters continued to throng the state Capitol. The upshot is a pitched battle between the old base of the Democratic Party - organized labor - and the new base of the Republican Party - the fiscally conservative, small-government activists who drove the GOP to success in the November election. Nearly identical measures are advancing in Ohio and Iowa, while Michigan and Indiana are exploring other ways of limiting protections for unionized government workers. All this is happening in states that have been hit hard both by the recession and the loss of union jobs over the decades. "What happened is the destruction of private-sector unionism in the Rust Belt - the [level] of private-sector unionism in Wisconsin and Ohio is what it used to be in Mississippi," said Nelson Lichtenstein, director of the Center for the Study of Work, Labor and Democracy at UC Santa Barbara. Most remaining union members are government employees, whose standards of living haven't fallen like their private-sector counterparts. "Now there's a social resentment," Lichtenstein said. "When there are only scattered islands of unionism, they stand out." President Obama, who has clashed with teachers unions and other government unions, has thrown in behind organized labor in this battle. Prominent Republicans - including House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and former Minnesota governor and possible presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty - have slammed Obama and backed Walker. "We're seeing a test of how serious the public at large is willing to go along with the Tea Party Express," said John Gilliom, a political science professor at Ohio University. "It's a live political science experiment." That's what drew Obama into the fight. His campaign operation, now known as Organizing for America, has been coordinating with union leaders protesting the bill in Wisconsin and those battling similar proposals elsewhere in the Midwest. The stakes are high for the president, whose party was routed in the region during the Republican tidal wave in November. He needs critical swing states like Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin to win reelection. And if those states' remaining unions are decimated, analysts say, that will be much harder. "Unions are the backbone of the Democratic Party," Lichtenstein said. "Their destruction in the Rust Belt would mean those states would be red like Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas." Across the country, governors of both parties are battling public employee unions to win concessions on pay, benefits and, most significantly, pension contributions. There are undeniable financial pressures: States face as much as $6 trillion in pension liabilities to government workers, whose unions negotiated generous pension benefits in lieu of high salaries over the decades. Either taxpayers will have to foot that bill or union members will have to take a haircut, said Robert Novy-Marx, who studies government pensions at the University of Rochester. "So the unions are representing interests that are diametrically opposed to the taxpayers." The tension is developing as the public's perception of unions is at its lowest level in 25 years. A poll from the Pew Research Center released this week found only 45% of Americans had a positive view of organized labor. But Pew's Carroll Doherty noted that 61% still believe unions are needed to improve working people's lives and that a plurality favors unions over governments in labor disputes. In Wisconsin, however, surveys have shown that more than 60% think public-sector unions should make concessions on benefits and pensions. Analysts elsewhere say there is similar resentment simmering across much of the Rust Belt, where unemployment is sky-high and where private-sector union workers have made concessions to keep their jobs. People who lost jobs are not happy "seeing their taxes spent on a work force that many see as oversized, inefficient and in need of reform," said Scott Watkins, a senior consultant at the Anderson Economic Group in East Lansing, Mich. Unions in Wisconsin and elsewhere say that they're willing to make concessions, but that approaches like Walker's go too far by virtually dissolving organized labor in government. Walker's proposal would force government workers to pay half their pension costs and 12% of their health costs. Most significantly, it would also bar them from collective bargaining and prevent government workers from getting raises above inflation without approval in a public referendum. Every year, union members would vote on whether the union could continue. These changes would not apply to state troopers, police or firefighters. Charles Franklin, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin, said that while the public agrees with Walker on the need for concessions, "my impression is there's much less support for de-unionizing the state." Franklin said that proposition will be put to the test as neither side in Wisconsin seems ready to give in. Democrats say they'll stay out of state for weeks if needed to force changes in Walker's proposal. The governor says he won't back down. "It's a real political dilemma now," Franklin said. Uttam Kumar Borthakur [email protected] Copyright (c) 2011, Los Angeles Times _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
