Very Erudite this!! mm
To: [email protected] From: [email protected] Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:49:51 +0000 Subject: [asom] Re: Assam's moment of truth Writing just to clarify: Actually, I am using "ahom" for the land (uppr-assam) as well as its people (uppr-assami). So among people based on gene fabric - "dravidian ahom" and "mongoloid ahom". e.g., 1. Manoj Das (Dravidian Ahom), Mike Mahant (Mongoloid Ahom) 2. Prafulla Mahanta (Dravidian Ahom), Tarun Gogoi (Mongoloid Ahom) Castism is not incorporated in my taxonomy on "ahom". Sure both Sabhapandit and Datta can help on castism. But have you considered looking at Hem Chandra Barua's documentation on various castes and tribes found among "ahom"? This can be good start so you both understand what have been existing and practiced. Hope this helps! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/assamonline/message/5296 --- In [email protected], "rsabhapandit@..." <rsabhapandit@...> wrote: Mr. Deka, Are you mad or what? Why do you bring castism/Ahom in every discussion? What is the relevance of Ahom in this topic? Please stop posting such cheap comments. Thanks Ranjit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/assamonline/message/5297 --- In [email protected], manash_dutta30@... wrote: Is this man Mr. Deka has some mental problem? Every time whenever there is a serious discussion he dilutes the topic with his stupid remarks. Mr. Deka whether Ahom, Mongoloid, dravidian, Koch, kosari etc does not matter. At the first instance we are all Assamese. Take pride of that. Thanks Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel __._,_.___ Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (23) Recent Activity: New Members 6 Visit Your Group Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use . __,_._,___ _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
