Pls read the trailing mail &  request all esteemed members of the group to 
forward it to your  circle to form a constructive discussion & creating 
awareness 

Regards 
Satyen Mahanta 

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "'Dr. Aroop J. Kalita' [email protected] [SupportAChild-Assam]" 
> <[email protected]>
> Date: 17 May 2015 4:38:51 PM GMT+05:30
> To: Wahid Saleh - Indiawijzer <[email protected]>, 'Ankur Bora' 
> <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: 'Ankur Bora' <[email protected]>, 'North East' 
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [SupportAChild-Assam] Re: [NorthEastIndia] Awareness on the need 
> for a Repatriation Treaty
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
> Dear Wahid da and Ankur,
> 
> Greetings !
> 
> The issue of illegal immigrants has been occupying a major space in our 
> social and political discourse since the last almost 4 decades. However , we 
> are yet to see any concrete solution emerging.
> 
> The Assam Accord itself has been debated, criticized, analyzed ...... and so 
> on and so forth. 
> 
> When a few of us  decided to get into the depths of this issue and have a 
> threadbare analysis of what went wrong or why this issue has not got resolved 
> till now, we had some interesting experiences .. will try to summarize a few. 
> The reason was simple ... if this issue/problem has a solution, then it needs 
> to be found out and highlighted and if there is no solution, its better to 
> leave it. 
> 
> We decided to organise a Seminar on the topic ::: Assam Accord - Fault in the 
> Accord or Fault in Implementation ? It was held on 21st of December in 
> Guwahati (Srimanta Shankaradeva Kalakshetra auditorium). We invited several  
> intellectuals , journalists, prominent citizens, etc. . whom we often see 
> either writing columns on this issue or deliberate in TV talk shows.   You 
> would be surprised to know that many of them asked us for a copy of the Assam 
> Accord !! We were dumbstruck ... the same people who wax eloquent on this 
> topic don't have a copy of the document on which they speak volumes !! 
> We also invited legal experts and signatories of the Assam Accord to the 
> seminar so that we could have the views of all. 
> 
> Then came the next part ... we started getting phone calls from several (so 
> called prominent)  people asking us not to go ahead with this seminar .... we 
> won't disclose their identities now (but surely in due course of time, we 
> will do so). We were surprised as to what was the issue if we held this 
> Seminar. But soon, things became clear......
> 
> Anyhow, the Seminar went on as scheduled, it was chaired by Dr. 
> R.C.Barpatragohain, Dean Faculty of Law, GU and Dr. Bhuban Ch Baruah, 
> Principal, Tezpur Law College. 
> 
> In that Seminar - I had presented an analysis of 13 Accords signed in 
> post-independent India in the North East from 1947 to 2005. We also analysed 
> which ones out of them were productive and which ones failed and why. We also 
> analysed the constitutional amendments which were brought about following the 
> signing of each accord to give effect to the agreed provisions of that 
> particular accord.
> 
> That vested interests and powers had no intention of this issue getting 
> resolved was clear if we analyse the clauses of the Assam Accord itself. And 
> also the fact that so many people lost their lives, suffered atrocities, 
> disabilities, etc. etc  to get a genuine problem brought to the attention of 
> the Center. 
> 
> Clause 5.9 of the Assam Accord states : The Government will give due 
> consideration to certain difficulties expressed by the AASU/AAGSP regarding 
> the implementation of the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 
> 1983 - yet it took the intervention of the Hon'ble SC and 21 long years to 
> get this act repealed/quashed. And surprisingly , even after the Hon'ble SC 
> struck down this act , subsequent to the said decision, instead of 
> implementing the directions therein, the Central Government  in exercise of 
> its power under Section 3 of the 1946 Act made  an Order known as "the 
> Foreigners (Tribunal) Amendment  Order, 2006" (for short "the 2006 Order"), 
> which was  published in the Official Gazette dated 10th February, 2006. On 
> 10th February, 2006, the Central Government amended the 1964 Order 
> principally making the same inapplicable to the  State of Assam. Again the SC 
> was approached and this was quashed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in 2006.... 
> Who is responsible for this and why ? 
> 
> Clause 5.8 of the same Accord states : Foreigners who came to Assam on or 
> after March 25, 1971 shall continue to be detected, deleted and practical 
> steps shall be taken to expel such foreigners. .... but even after finalizing 
> a time bound schedule to implement the clauses of the Assam Accord .. the 
> Center kept dragging its feet. 
> 
> Clause 10. of the AA states :  The Ministry of Home Affairs will be the nodal 
> Ministry for the implementation of the above. 
> 
> The 2 major issues in the Illegal immigrants problem are - 
> 1. The porous international border
> 2. Detection, deletion and deportation of illegal immigrants 
> 
> And both these subjects are Central subjects, no state government has any 
> jurisdiction over them.
> 
> The Report of the Committee for Preventing Infiltration through the 
> unprotected riverine areas in the Assam-Bangladesh Border – constituted by 
> GOA on 12th September’2011 submitted its report on  19th January’2013  and 
> this report shows some shocking revelations as to how the international 
> border in this part of the country has been neglected since independence till 
> date.
> 
> Anyhow during that seminar, we highlighted the fact that unless and until we 
> have a "Repatriation Treaty" with Bangladesh, it is not legally possible to 
> deport illegal immigrants even after the Tribunals / Courts declare them as 
> illegal immigrants. 
> 
> The glaring failure in deportation of illegal immigrants is also evident from 
> the Tripura State Government and ATTF accord signed in 1993 – (also called 
> The Agartala Agreement) –wherein in Clause 2.(B) it was mentioned  that - 
> Action would be taken in respect of sending back all Bangladesh foreign 
> nationals who have come to Tripura after 25th March, 1971 and are not in 
> possession of valid documents authorizing their presence in Tripura.....
> However records of the actual status reveal that, till July 2012 only 2442 
> people were pushed back while 42,338 people were declared as foreigners... 
> which is a mere 5.76%
> 
> Most news papers of the state carried this on 22nd December, but then we 
> realized that this aspect was  till date not highlighted /brought into public 
> domain ... the reasons for the same are not clear till date. Most people we 
> spoke to pleaded ignorance. Subsequently we brought many recent reports of 
> World Bank and UN  into public discourse. 
> 
> We prepared a detailed memorandum in this regard and presented to the Hon'ble 
> Speaker of Assam Legislative Assembly and also the Hon'ble Governor. We 
> requested the Hon'ble Speaker to convene a special session of the Assembly to 
> adopt a resolution in this regard and place before the GOI. The Hon'ble 
> Governor when  appraised of this issue, suggested that we send copies to the 
> memorandum to Hon'ble Speaker of the Lok Sabha and Hon'ble Chairman of Rajya 
> Sabha and he volunteered to forward them through his office. 
> 
> We also published a booklet on this issue which we have sent to all MLAs & 
> MPs of our state and also to Editors and prominent journalists of the state 
> and the country. 
> 
> As Wahid da has mentioned, India and Bangladesh have signed an Extradition 
> Treaty on 28th Jan,2013 but as per Article 2 of the treaty - An extradition 
> offence for the purposes of this Treaty is constituted by conduct which under 
> the laws of each Contracting State is punishable by a term of imprisonment 
> for a period of at least one year.  However as per our laws, if anyone enters 
> our country illegally , he/she if caught is convicted under the Passport Act 
> and under the provisions of the same, the maximum punishment is 3 months 
> imprisonment.  This has been highlighted in several recent court  cases where 
> even after conviction and serving the jail term, India is unable to deport a 
> person to Bangladesh. 
> 
> The Indian Parliament enacted the The Repatriation of Prisoners Act, in 2003 
> and following that till November’2014 India has signed such agreements with 
> 35 countries including Bangladesh. However under the said act : “prisoner” 
> means a person undergoing a sentence of imprisonment under an order passed by 
> a
> criminal court including the courts established under the law for the time 
> being in force in contracting States. Moreover, to be repatriated , any 
> prisoner who is a citizen of a contracting State may make an application to 
> the Central Government for transfer for transfer of his custody from India to 
> that contracting State , Provided that if a prisoner is not able to make an 
> application himself because of his ill health, mental condition, old age or 
> being a minor, then, the application may be made by any other person entitled 
> to act on his behalf.
> 
> Thus the provisions of the existing treaties make it impossible to apply to 
> the case of illegal immigrants.  
> 
> After we had press conferences on this issue and we handed over copies of 
> booklets to all the Media houses of the state and several prominent citizens, 
> slowly we are seeing that people are realising the implications of the 
> absence of this treaty and we are seeing mention of the need for a 
> "Repatriation Treaty" in several Editorials , Letters to editors, Articles by 
> Columnists, etc... 
> 
> Various people belonging to various strata and sections of our society talk 
> about a multitude of problems and issues and instead of exploring and 
> highlighting solutions to these issues try to attract attention of the people 
> by coming to the streets. In a democratic form of governance, protests based 
> on facts and logic definitely has a role to play. But at the same time, we 
> have a responsibility to explore and highlight solutions to these 
> problems/issues. Instead of creating unnecessary disturbances which are 
> avoidable,  we believe that if people become aware of the actual reasons 
> behind the problems plaguing our state, public pressure will build up  and 
> eventually the Governments of the day will be forced to act. 
> 
> People get misled because of ignorance and in this case when most of the 
> intelligentsia was ignorant, the common man can't be blamed. 
> 
> We are making an effort, there might be shortcomings .. we welcome 
> constructive suggestions.
> 
> Warm Regards
> 
> Aroop
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Saturday, May 16, 2015 2:59 AM, "'Wahid Saleh - Indiawijzer' 
> [email protected] [NorthEastIndia]" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>  
> Dear Ankur,
> It is a good initiative. So also the work done by Aroop and his group.
> But don’t you think that your request/proposal regarding the “Need an 
> Indo-Bangladesh repatriation treaty” is like closing the stable door after 
> the horse has bolted?
> There is already an India-Bangladesh extradition treaty which took effect in 
> October 2013.  The treaty allows exchange of convicts sentenced for more than 
> a year in prison but will not be applicable to political prisoners and asylum 
> seekers. This treaty helped to get the ULFA leaders' extradicated to India.
> Would it not be easier/better to seek amendments to an existing treaty than 
> trying to put something new?
> For the list of extradition treaty signed by India with another country pls 
> visit Extradition Treaties and Arrangements. The link Extradition - Central 
> Bureau of Investigation also provides information on this issue.
> My two cents!
> Greetings,
> Wahid da
> PS: For the next two weeks I shall have limited access to Internet.
>  
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Ankur Bora [email protected] [NorthEastIndia]
> Sent: vrijdag 15 mei 2015 22:21
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Dr. Aroop J. Kalita; Ankur Bora; North East
> Subject: Re: [SupportAChild-Assam] Re: [NorthEastIndia] Awareness on the need 
> for a Repatriation Treaty
>  
>  
> Dear all
>  
> Please find my Letters to the editor  Assam Tribune.  The original has also 
> been attached below.
> http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/showpage.asp?id=may1615,6,435,1611,981,546
>  
> I stongly believe that Delhi hoodwink the Assamese people in 1985 , 
> unfortunately none realized it at that time.  I am glad that Aroop Kalita and 
> others are taking it now.  I am trying to convey in the letter - It's not a 
> new demand , The Union Government is duty bound to sign the Treaty. 
>  Need an Indo-Bangladesh repatriation treaty
> Sir,
> The unabated influx of illegal migrants from Bangladesh into Assam and the 
> consequent dramatic change in the demographic pattern of the state, has been 
> a matter of grave concern to all of us. If the trend doesn’t change ,  
> Assamese will be a minority on their own land , consequent relegation of 
> their language and culture, loss of control over their economy and politics, 
> and, in the final analysis, the loss of their very identity and individuality 
> as a people. After the six years long Assam movement and the subsequent 
> signing of Assam Accord in 1985, common people hoped that the Assamese 
> identity would be protected.
> However, many of us, later realized that certain clause of the accord was 
> simply a tool to hoodwink people from the agitation.  It is said the accord 
> was drafted overnight on 14th of August and the student leaders were made to 
> sign the accord next day.  In retrospect, those inexperienced young men had 
> neither foresight nor acumen to examine the clauses of the accord before 
> signing in. They were a desperate lot to capture political power and rule the 
> people. Assamese people also supported them blindly; there was no critical 
> examination, perhaps no one read what was there in the accord, most 
> unfortunately.
> There are many loopholes and the main one is the procedure for deportation of 
> illegal immigrants. The accord clearly defines who is a foreigner of illegal 
> Bangladeshi. However, there is no well-defined , practical steps required to 
> be taken for expulsion of the detected foreigners.  It is not possible to 
> carry out deportation, if there is no proper procedure. It’s always takes 
> tremendous effort to detect an illegal  , the next step i.e. deportation is 
> perilous. There is proper flag meeting between BSF and Border Guard 
> Bangladesh (BGB) and deportation takes place only when BGB accepts the 
> foreigner. If BGB refuses to accept the foreigner, BSF is left with no 
> further option and such persons become ‘stateless’; they would most likely 
> reenter back in Assam.
> This is why a repatriation treaty is needed between Government of India (GOI) 
> and Government of Bangladesh. The GOI has to sit across the table with its 
> counterpart and work towards a laid down procedure for persons being deported 
> to their territory. The recent Indo–Bangla land transfer treaty is a glowing 
> sign of co-operation between the two countries. It is the right moment to 
> raise the influx issue by the Indian Government in their bilateral talks. It 
> is also the duty of India government since the union is constitutionally 
> bound to protect its states and citizens. Hence, Delhi should engage Dhaka to 
> sign illegal migrants repatriation treaty, without which pushing back off any 
> foreigners cannot be handled legally.
> We also request the members of parliaments of Assam and forums like Axom 
> Jatiya Gana Sangram Parishad to raise the issue at the national and 
> international level.  Illegal immigrant is not only a threat to Assam; they 
> are a threat to constitutional sovereignty and integrity of India. We cannot 
> remain blind us to these realities.
> Sincerely
> Ankur Bora
> Dallas , Texas , USA
>  
> On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 10:11 AM, "Niren Choudhury [email protected] 
> [SupportAChild-Assam]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>  
>  
> Hi All,
>  
> I do concur with Tituraj. I just do not understand if we could identify and 
> count the number of foreigners, why we have so much problem in detention. One 
> of reasons may be corruption which is our own issue rather than Bangladesh 
> government.
>  
> Immigration issue will be always continued. Who knows if Bangladesh became 
> economically stronger, may be some of Indian will go there. In today's global 
> economy, it is not unthinkable. In that scenarios, all of those foreigners 
> will run back faster than bullet train.
>  
> But that is more like a dream for now. The best solution is actually to 
> engage with Bangladesh govt and with govt of Assam in trade and Transportaion 
> agreement. I am sure Bangladesh govt will be willing to engage in that 
> discussion more easily that deportation discussion. In that case, all those 
> "foreigners" could be utilized as bi-partisan agreement. In fact that will 
> employ lots more from Assam and Bangladesh.
>  
> One other point. If we do not have to depend upon Bangladeshi for our daily 
> labor work, they will likely go back anyway. Here also, we need to look into 
> our daily lives. 
>  
> Even if Bangladeshi give agrees to take over, we will probably can send only 
> 50% or 30%. That is huge effort and time to get very limited success.
>  
> In summary, let us think about friendly trade and Transportaion and let us 
> try to do something of our own rather than depending upon foreigners. 
> Immigration will take care of itself.
>  
> Thx
> Niren
> 
> 
> On May 13, 2015, at 5:03 AM, tituraj kashyap [email protected] 
> [SupportAChild-Assam] <[email protected]> wrote:
>  
> I believe you are aiming for the star, if not Utopia. I wish you my best 
> wishes in this regard.
> However, when we deal at a contentious issues, where everyone has suffered, 
> isn't it best to address it in a more pragmatic way?
> If we believe that today we can detect, check and push back illegal 
> immigrants from our neighboring countries, then we are no less than God. 
> Imagine a person who is born in 1971 (the cut off year) in India to parents 
> of disputed nationality. Today, he is 44 years old, lived all his life in 
> India, married with children, most probably exercise adult franchise 
> regularly, living and tilling land in India. Is he not a son of the soil? 
> 
> I don't know if we should move beyond and think and look for a practical 
> solution than beating around the bush that may be dead in popular conscience 
> long time ago.
> Rest, if we are talking it in order to exercise our grey cells and maneuver 
> it to drive a practical political point, then it is perfect.
>  
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:41 PM, 'Dr. Aroop J. Kalita' [email protected] 
> [NorthEastIndia] <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>  
> [Attachment(s) from Dr. Aroop J. Kalita included below]
> Respected Sir / Madam,
>  
> Greetings !
>  
> Almost 3 decades have elapsed since the signing of the historic Assam Accord 
> in 1985 ending a six year long agitation by the people of Assam against the 
> unabated illegal immigration from the neighboring country of Bangladesh, but 
> the core issue yet remains unresolved.
>  
> The White Paper on Foreigners’ Issue released by  the Home & Political 
> Department of Government of Assam on 20th October,2012 clearly shows the rate 
> of push back / deportation against the number of persons declared as 
> foreigners by both IM(DT) Tribunals & Foreigners Tribunals which is a mere 
> 2442 till July,2012 against a total of 55,184 declared as foreigners. 
>  
> The same White Paper in Section 2.5 DEPORTATION/ PUSH BACK clearly mentions 
> the following :
> 2.5.2. Once a person is declared as foreigner he or she is taken into custody 
> and kept in detention centre till he or she is pushed back to his or her 
> country of origin. The foreigners who are kept in detention centre are pushed 
> back through BSF deployed on the border.
> 2.5.3. There is difference between 'Push Back' and 'Deportation'. In case of 
> Push Back there is no need for acceptance of the person concerned by the BGB. 
> In case of deportation, on the other hand, there is proper flag meeting 
> between BSF and BGB and deportation takes place only when BGB accepts the 
> foreigner. If BGB refuses to accept the foreigner, BSF is left with no 
> further option and such persons become 'stateless'.
> 2.5.4. In the absence of a proper laid down procedure for deportation of 
> illegal migrants between the Government of India and the Government of 
> Bangladesh, it has become difficult to carry out deportations. As such, 
> deportation of foreigners is mainly carried out through the ‘push back’ 
> method. …….. The matter of deportation of foreigners who have illegally 
> entered into India needs to be taken up by the Government of India with the 
> Government of Bangladesh so that a proper policy could be evolved and the 
> process of deportation of such declared foreigners become easier and hassle 
> free.
> Also it is quite surprising at the same time that out of the declared number 
> of persons identified as foreigners, the figures of persons  kept in 
> detention centers is as follows as per the data published in the 
> aforementioned White Paper : The number of such foreigners kept is three 
> detention centers (as on 15/10/2012) is as follows-. Goalpara (66), Kokrajhar 
> (32), and Silchar (20) which is a mere 0.2% of the total number of persons 
> declared as foreigners which is also possibly due to absence of an effective 
> laid down mechanism  for  effective deportation.
> However till date, we are yet to see the Government of India formally taking 
> up this issue with Government of Bangladesh and also at the same time we have 
> not seen concrete steps being taken up by Government of Assam to effectively 
> take up the matter with the Government of India  regarding the issue of 
> effective deportation of illegal immigrants as is evident from  Section  4.7 
> – of the aforementioned White Paper titled “Roadmap for Future” which is 
> strangely silent on this issue.
>  
> At this stage, taking into account the developments in most advanced 
> countries and their formulation of Immigration policies and the Repatriation 
> Treaties, with the intervention of the United Nations, and in compliance with 
> the directions made by the Division Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, it is 
> the bounded duty on the part of the Government of India to immediately 
> negotiate with the Government of Bangladesh and sign a Repatriation Treaty to 
> resolve the vexed and hydra-headed issue of illegal immigration from 
> Bangladesh.
>  
> This issue of a absence of a Repatriation Treaty between India and Bangladesh 
> as being the major impediment in deportation of illegal immigrants is yet to 
> be highlighted in the national media so that attention of the lawmakers of 
> our country can to be drawn to this subject and also at the same time, the 
> people of our country become aware of the threat being faced by the 
> indigenous people of Assam, who as a  result of this population movement from 
> Bangladesh, face the serious threat of  being reduced to a minority in their 
> home state with their cultural survival in jeopardy, their political control 
> weakened and their employment opportunities undermined.
>  
> We therefore seek to draw you attention to this subject and seek your kind 
> help in getting this issue highlighted amongst your friends / acquaintances / 
> associates. 
>  
> A copy of a booklet on “ Repatriation Treaty – The only workable solution for 
> deportation of illegal migrants” printed and published by us to highlight 
> this issue is being attached for your needful  perusal.
>  
> Thanking you
>  
> Yours Sincerely
> Dr. Aroop Jyoti Kalita
> (Chief Convenor)
>  
> Dr. Shyamal Kumar Bhuyan
> Debajit Adhikari
> Dilwar Hussain
> (Convenors)
>  
> Guwahati, Assam, India
> 
> 
>  
> -- 
> Axom Jatiya Gana Sangram Parishad
>                         .... exploring logical solutions for a progressive 
> Assam 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Tituraj
> 9871918187
> http://twitter.com/tituraj
>  
> 
> 
> __._,_.___
> Posted by: "Dr. Aroop J. Kalita" <[email protected]>
> Reply via web post    •        Reply to sender                •        Reply 
> to group                 •       Start a New Topic       •       Messages in 
> this topic (7)
> VISIT YOUR GROUP
> • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use 
> .
>  
> 
> __,_._,___
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to