To,Shri Banwarilal Purohit,Hon’ble Governor of Assam,Raj Bhawan,Kharghuli, 
Guwahati-781004Dated: Guwahati, 31 October 2016Your Excellency,Warm greetings 
from the Patriotic People’s Front Assam (PPFA).We would like to bring to your 
kind attention some of the recent misleading and manipulative statements by 
some individuals and organizations on the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2016 
issue. We are shocked that these groups of vested interests are trying to 
communalise the issue instead of helping to find an amicable solution.The 
extremely volatile utterances targeting the Hindu minority community of Assam 
is deplorable and condemnable to say the least. We are from this land of 
glorious civilization & culture and we feel that our spirit should be that of 
accommodation of Hindu, Buddhists, Christians, Sikhs  and other religious 
minorities who have had to face extreme suppression in erstwhile East Pakistan 
(now Bangladesh) and also West Pakistan and have been the true victims of 
partition of India. We would like to take this opportunity to highlight the 
historical truth that cannot and should not be forgotten and which will attempt 
to build an honest perspective on the issue of who is a ‘foreigner’ in Assam 
(India) which has been a touchy and thorny issue since long.
Hence, we must all look back and see what transpired in 1942 when Mahatma 
Gandhi called for the 'Quit India' movement. The Muslim League raised another 
slogan 'Divide India And Quit'.  In 1946, the 'Pakistan' demand of Muslim 
league, supported by the undivided Communist Party of India (CPI), was 
accompanied by 'Direct Action' or the violent communal riots like the 'Great 
Calcutta killing' where nearly 5000 people were killed or massacred in only 4 
days. Assam's eminent poet Amulya Barua was one of the victims in that killing 
field. History bears witness to the fact that Muslims of undivided India that 
followed the ideology of Muslim League and who wanted a separate homeland for 
the Muslims were granted Pakistan and thus they became ‘foreigners’ to Indians. 
In fact the moment they created a foreign land for themselves they lost their 
rights to get into India again without passports or related legal documents. 
So, post 15 August 1947 India, all those who demanded and chose to live in 
Pakistan (including East Pakistan) was legally foreigners.  However, history is 
also witness to the fact that the minority Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists 
who were left behind in Pakistan were continuing to face brutal suppression at 
the hands of the new non-secular government, which prompted the Prime Minister 
of Independent India Jawaharlal Nehru to issue a historic statement in 
Parliament that non-Muslims would be safe and secure in Pakistan as both the 
new nations pledged to be good and friendly neighbours. However, Nehru also 
declared in the Parliament that if, in future, non-Muslims felt unsafe and 
insecure in Pakistan due to religious or communal persecutions, they would be 
always welcome in India and they would not be treated as 'foreigners' in India. 
It is indeed a matter of great satisfaction that the Union government in New 
Delhi has taken steps lately to provide shelter to these 'Victims of Partition' 
all over the country following a process of equal distribution. In fact, it is 
a long pending moral responsibility which India should have shouldered much 
earlier (soon after Nehru made the promise in the Parliament).But better late 
than never, and we must all support the government’s action to give citizenship 
rights to the victims of Partition who have taken shelter in India from 
Pakistan and Bangladesh till 2014. We must not forget that among these people 
are many whose ancestors also fought and sacrificed their lives along with many 
others for an independent India, which has made us free citizens of an 
independent nation today. Let all of us be grateful to them.We are also fully 
aware that since the formation of Bangladesh and the assassination of Sheikh 
Mujibur Rahman in 1975, Bangladesh made Islam the State religion setting into 
motion the persecution of minority non-Muslims. In Bangladesh, the Hindus 
include Bengali, Rajbongshi, Hajong, Adivasi, Jayantiya and Bishnupriya 
communities, Buddhists (represented by Chakmas) and some Assamese people also, 
who fled to the Chittagong hill areas during the Burmese invasion. The 
Christians include Bengali, Garo, Khasi and Adivasi people. All these people 
became the victims of 'Pakistan Plan' & 'Partition’ and had to therefore live 
in a 'foreign land,’ for the creation of which they were not at all 
responsible.So, under no circumstances these people can be termed as 
'foreigners'. The foreigners are those who created the 'foreign land’ in the 
name of religion, but again these are the same group of people who are 
infiltrating into India, the country they hated to live in, before 1947 for 
reasons best known to them. If the history of Partition is properly studied, we 
can clearly understand who these ‘Foreigners’ are and who are the actual 
'Victims of Partition' and who came to India to protect their religions, 
cultures and their lives. However, we have no intention of communalizing the 
issue but we want to provide a clear understanding of how history unfolded lest 
some vested interests and parochial mindsets for their own narrow political 
gains and cheap mileage would continue to resort to disturb the peace and 
tranquil atmosphere of Assam. There is a need for a solution to this vexed 
issue and we would fully agree if those that have been truly victimized owing 
to Partition and religious persecution are given a place not just in Assam but 
in all other States of India, a country where the underlying tenets of 
democracy are tolerance, secularism and freedom of religion, faith, practice 
and freedom of expression.
Finally, we also raise our voices for a concrete refugee policy for India so 
that we can deal with the issue of immigrants logically and legally. We 
sincerely believe India should sign the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention. 
Moreover, our government has to ratify the 1967 Protocol relating to the status 
of refugees.
With Regards,Dhirendra Nath Chakrabarty (Guwahati)Dr Rabin Dev Choudhury 
(Guwahati)Giripada Dev Choudhury (Guwahati)Dr Nirode K Barooah (Cologne, 
Germany)Dr AK Rai (BHU, Varanasi)Rupam Barua (Gauripur)Nava Thakuria 
(Nalbari)Jagadindra Ray Choudhury (Barpeta)Anup  Sarma  (Guwahati)Manju Bora 
(Guwahati)Pranjal Saikia (Guwahati)Utpal Dutta (Guwahati)Dipannita Jaiswal  
(Guwahati)Jitul Sonowal (Guwahati)Bobita Sarma (Guwahati)Bidhayak Das (Bangkok, 
Thailand)Vavani Sarmah (Washington, USA)Kalyan Dutta-Choudhury (Berkeley, USA) 
Pranab Kr Sharma (Guwahati)Prasenjit Chakrabarty (Agartala)Dr Subhra Kinkor 
Goswami (Nalbari)Gourishankar S Hiremath (IIT, Kharagpur)Anjanil Kashyap (New 
Delhi)Jahnabi Goswami (Guwahati)Girindra Kumar Karjee (Guwahati)Bibekananda 
Choudhury (Guwahati)Ravindranath (Dhemaji)Namrata Dutta (Guwahati)Bhagawat 
Pritam (Guwahati)Braja Jyoti Sharma (Nagaon)Tarali Chakrabarty (Guwahati)Ujjal 
Saikia (Tezpur)Akhyamala Bora (Dergaon)Gitika Talukder (Colombo, Srilanka)Arun 
Sarkar (Dudhnoi)Nripen Dutta (Chamata)Onkareshwar Pandey (Noida)
_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.assamnet.org/listinfo.cgi/assam-assamnet.org

Reply via email to