> My question is this: > > If we give Ajim Premjee a place of residence at say, > Nalbari district. The per capita income of Nalbari > dist. might shoot up to > probably meet or exceed that of a country with a > respectable per-capita > income. > But would it make the lives of people living in > Nalbari any better, even > after a reasonable trickle down ? > > > cm
That (Premjee living in Nalbari voluntarily) is a very hypothetical and unlikely assumption. Even if Nalbari district were to produce a home bred Premjee without impacting the economic index of the rest of the population, the only model that could do that will be a feudalistic model based on economic exploitation, as opposed to economic freedom of the masses. I guess we should try to think - What economic options witin a system will help to create the likes of Premji's and at the same time uplift the economic index of the general citizen ? I bet the answer will be Greater Choice of economic activities and that's what the article tried indexing on. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
