|
Although you wanted to end that
string, I'm still intrigued and wanted to just add my final
thoughts.
>DD: If my certification means anything at
all, you are very much a part of the Houston Assamese community >and
the Assamnet community.
Thank you. I appreciate that.
>Now, to be a part of an "association"
community, as you know, one has to be a paying member. Why paying
>membership? Mainly so that there is fund from membership dues and so that
the association is run based on
I guess this does not apply to me. At this point, I am not
interested in being a paid or unpaid member of any association.
>the votes allotted to the members.
"Associations" are needed to continue the community activities year after
>year without interruption, and monetary and voluntary time contributions
from members are needed so that the
You are right. While I am not against forming associations that have the
community as a focus, relating to the above, I was wondering how members
benefit (intrinsic or otherwise). Having multiple associations is a big turn
off and also is wastage of money and other resources, especially taking
into account all the redundancy that occur. Don't you think so?
>the associations are very dependent
on contribution from members and I request the "fence-sitters" to be part
>of an "association", any association for that matter. MIND YOU, THIS IS ONLY
A REQUEST TO ALL >READING THIS EMAIL, WITH THE FUTURE IN MIND.
As far as I understand, even a member of an association can be
a fence-sitter (have nothing against the term, but it is
just hilarious to see some people thinking of themselves as
the 'important persons from the in-group' and in turn, distancing
themselves from these fence-sitters - many in Houston/Texas itself), and I will
tell you why they are that, from my experience: there were a number of times
when we thought we should also join this or that association, but frankly the
biggest turn-off we have had is the attitude of a few who are in the "lead"
or wannabes.
This attitude alone
is making many fringe members want to get out and of course, and
turning some others into a part of the scenery - the
dormant fence-sitters. I grant you this:
some will always take the lead while others will never want to, so we can't
always blame the proactive ones, but all they need is an adjustment in attitude.
That I think, would attract would-be members and make associations stronger.
BTW, I am not saying these problems are symptomatic of one association
alone.
Again, in this regard, I think you are one of the few who can be
appraoched. I also think you're practical and will take the above as
constructive criticism from a close community member.
|
- Re: Re: [Assam] Surplus from Houston - a clarifica... Alpana Sarangapani
- Re: Re: [Assam] Surplus from Houston - a clari... Chan Mahanta
- Re: Re: [Assam] Surplus from Houston - a c... Alpana Sarangapani
- Re: Re: [Assam] Surplus from Houston -... Chan Mahanta
- Re: Re: [Assam] Surplus from Hous... Alpana Sarangapani
- Re: Re: [Assam] Surplus from ... D Deka
- Re: Re: [Assam] Surplus from ... Alpana Sarangapani
- [Assam] Community Work and Vo... D Deka
- [Assam] Re: Community Work an... Alpana Sarangapani
- Re: [Assam] Re: Community Wor... D Deka
- Re: [Assam] Surplus from Hous... Alpana Sarangapani
- Re: [Assam] Surplus from Houston Bharat B
- Re: [Assam] Surplus from Houston Chan Mahanta
