chan mahanta wrote, "For example if I wanted to dwell
on YOUR case, I could easily do that. I can draw
cricles around you blindfolded. But this forum is NOT
about YOU. It is not about ME. You seem to forget
that." 

wondering why does he provoke? he can just do what he
wants to do. who stops him?

this message board is for his pissing-contest and for
him to pussy-foot around. but riverlink is not, am
sure,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alnane/message/2457
that is what i tell!

elderly is a virtue, 
it simply did not germinate in doo-doo. he cannot tell
with his mouth he speaks with ...beep...
anonymous-mouth(s), i.e., Tilok or Bharat B, or kona
nigoni, or borolaa ... :)

kind regards, 
rabin 

============attached===============
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:54:28 -0500 
To: "Rabin Deka" , [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
From: "Chan Mahanta" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Language Sensitivity and Rabin Deka's
Obsessions 

Hi Rabin: 

What is your point?
Is it my language that bothers you?
I use language to emphasize a point, not to denigrate
people, even YOU. I could. But I choose not to.

For example if I wanted to dwell on YOUR case, I could
easily do that. I can draw cricles around you
blindfolded. But this forum is NOT about YOU. It is
not about ME. You seem to forget that.

I was requested by the River-linking moderator not to
post messages on the subject being discussed by Zakir
Kibria that dealt mostly with B'Desh issues. Zakir is
a frquent participant in SOUTH ASIAN issues, and I
guess that is why he brought up the Sunderbans oil
drilling into the discussion, which some Hindu
Nationalist types objected to. They had a right to.
And I was requested not to 'reply-all' to those posts,
since river-linking too got the messages. I have no
problems with that. It was my mistake.

Now you want Jugal and Saurav to censor or chastise me
because of what?

* My language?
* The content of my posts?
* The nature of my posts: public issues ( as opposed
to a personal crusade -- get it )?
* Partiality--as in chastising Badan B. but not me ?

You keep attempting to make an issue of my choice of
certain words and phrases. The arguments you make in
support of your points are ridiculous, nonesensical
and fraught with ignorance of the contemporary usage
of the English language. But really, the language
alibi is just a subterfuge--everyone knows that. It is
NOT the reason for your obsession with Chandan
Mahanta. You are obsessed with cm because he told some
truths that were hurtful to you and you felt ridiculed
and insulted publicly.

Now, not being able to admit to the real reasons of
your displeasure is nothing to be proud of. Is it?
Besides it won't make your PROBLEM go away.

CM had Tilok Daktor to do an anlysis of your posts,
and he brought home unpleasant truths for all to see.
He didn't do so because he doesn't like your face, but
because you made ridiculous arguments and you were
getting personal with several netters when unable to
defend your positions. Instead of attempting to
persuade your peers to YOUR convictions you embarked
on personal attacks.

You brought it upon yourself.

A public insult in itself doesn't mean much. One has
to look at the source and the context. If people I
respect insult me wilfully, I would be hurt, but those
whom I don't respect can't hurt me. An implicit insult
embedded in a heated argument isn't something to take
to heart either.

I get insulted by a lot of netters. Sometimes they
respond with what they consider their ultimate weapons
-- mud slinging, or using 'gaalis'. Badan Barphukan
and Tapan Kalita are good examples.( BTW, not that it
matters, but we happen to know who they really are/is,
regardless of how YOU attempt to portray them/him --
as innocent youth ).But I don't get on a personal
crusade against them, because I am NOT hurt and
because I understand what causes them to do that: an
inability to articulate their opposition to my
arguments.

What I am curious about is YOUR obsessions. I KNOW for
a fact that a good many other netters are too. The
only explanation so far is your past track record,
with other netters. It is a modus operandi with you.
You did not learn any better. WHEN IN A DEBATING
CORNER YOU GET PERSONAL. Is it a wothwhile pursuit? Or
do you make yourself look bad? I hope you have the
ability to sort that out and will exercise it.

cm

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam

Reply via email to