>*** Is Hindu-nationalism equated to be pro-Indianism therefore, so that if >one is not a >Hindu nationalism supporter them he/she must be anti-Indian by
No. I was merely taking the cue from you, C'da.
The bridege-builders were not necessarily hindus, why did you ask to "shed some hindu nationalism" when the work was appreciated? :) Is it because it happened somewhere in India?
I just put two and two together on how you get things connected.
:) :)
>From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Alpana B. Sarangapani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Assam] re: replacing bridges in 9 hours
>Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:29:32 -0500
>
>Hi A:
>
>
>
>
> >and you some Anti-India.
>
>
>*** Is Hindu-nationalism equated to be pro-Indianism therefore, so that if
>one is not a Hindu nationalism supporter them he/she must be anti-Indian by
>default :-)?
>
>
>c-da
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 10:52 AM -0500 9/26/03, Alpana B. Sarangapani wrote:
> >
> >
> >>shedding some hindu-nationalism baggage to become able to see things more
> >>clearly.
> >
> >
> >
> >and you some Anti-India.
> >
> >
> >
> >:)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: Chan Mahanta >To: "deepjyoti kakati" ,
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Assam] re: replacing bridges in 9
> >hours >Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:52:01 -0500 > > >1. it was a election
> >publicity stunt by govt > >2. no minorities were given chance to be
> >labour > >3. its all a fake, everything from india is a fake > >4. its a
> >conspiracy against assam (as usual) > >5. why 140 yr old bridge was there
> >in first place > >6. has anyone done a audit of cost incurred > >7. its
> >delhis fault! (as usual) > >8. it proves india is a sectarian country >
> >>9. St. louis under your guidance did a 10km bridge in 2 hrs. > >10.
> >incite a tangential flamewar to hide the original issue > > > >***
> >Those were excellent attempts at reading my mind. But it is really not >a
> >very fruitful pursuit to try and PREDICT what MY responses might be. It
> >>is a sure way to get oneself upset with no other conceivable benefit. >
> >>A far better approach would have been to deal with the issue in point. >
> >>*** In this instance the issue was with the news report, the information
> >>contained in ( or missing from) the report , and if that was ADEQUATE to
> >>judge >the MAIN IDEA as expressed in the headline/subject title. >
> >>Was it adequate for a technically highly trained and obviously exposed to
> >>the world around person like yourself? > >Maybe it was. If it was, we
> >might have attempted to explain why it was. >That, I would submit,would
> >have been a more productive endeavor. > >That also could have put me in
> >my place for asking outrageous and/or >otherwise embarassing questions,
> >exposing my ignorant, anti-Indian >tendencies. > > > > > >I never
> >address any of my informational type posts to you and would prefer > >you
> >not > >comment on them. my posts are meant for the more serious posters
> >here. > > >*** Now, now! We don't need to get THAT protective of a
> >newspaper report do >we? It was hardly out of the ordinary bit of
> >incisive desi-reporting, >heh-heh. Nobody was accusing Deepjyoti of
> >either malfeasance or propaganda. >The only negative connotation might
> >have been in being perceived as >gullible or simple minded. Nothing to
> >get so worked up about, to take it >personally. More so since it is not
> >an incurable condition. All it takes is >shedding some hindu-nationalism
> >baggage to become able to see things more >clearly. > > > >cm :-) >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >At 5:31 PM +0530 9/26/03,
> >deepjyoti kakati wrote: > >>So when you crow about all of it done in 9
> >hours, WITHOUT telling of the > >>details, the size and complexity of the
> >tasks involved, the story means > >>very little. > > > >CM even if the
> >article had mentioned the bridges being 1 km long each , you > >would say
> >> > > >1. it was a election publicity stunt by govt > >2. no minorities
> >were given chance to be labour > >3. its all a fake, everything from
> >india is a fake > >4. its a conspiracy against assam (as usual) > >5.
> >why 140 yr old bridge was there in first place > >6. has anyone done a
> >audit of cost incurred > >7. its delhis fault! (as usual) > >8. it
> >proves india is a sectarian country > >9. St. louis under your guidance
> >did a 10km bridge in 2 hrs. > >10. incite a tangential flamewar to hide
> >the original issue > > > >I never address any of my informational type
> >posts to you and would prefer > >you not > >comment on them. my posts
> >are meant for the more serious posters here. > > > >thanks for your
> >consideration. > > >
> >>_________________________________________________________________ >
> >>Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it
> >now > >FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com > > >
> >>_______________________________________________ > >Assam mailing list >
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> >>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam > > >
> >>_______________________________________________ >Assam mailing list
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >
Get McAfee virus scanning and
> >cleaning of incoming attachments. Get Hotmail Extra Storage!
> >_______________________________________________ Assam mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
