> And ULFA was NOT 'discredited' when it emerged. Even
> now it is
> discredited only in certain circles. ULFA could not
"Certain circles" indeed! Innocent civilians bombed
out and the level of extortion and the money hoarded
in Bangladesh are somewhat universal yardsticks for
defining discredited or not.
In any case we are talking about the future and the
system for it. Not about what ULFA was 20 years back.
About what it is today and what it is capable of
tommorow versus what the current system is today and
what it is capable of tomorrow.
So what is the verdict on the following about ULFA AS
THINGS STAND TODAY:
a. Its capability to define the "sovereign" nation it
is fighting for
b. Its capability or defined vision in terms of how it
will govern the sovereign nation in a way that is
fundamentally better than what it is today?
c. Its defined idealogy and the committment of its
cadre to its idealogy?.
d. Its capability to wage war "successfully"
e. And to cut it short, its record of respecting
people's opinion?
Then there is the small point about whether it does
indeed represent the sovereign nation it has defined
for itself?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
Mailing list FAQ:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
To unsubscribe or change options:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
