Border villagers as fair game

By Thangkhanlal Ngaihte
Recurring incidents of poor villagers on the India-Burmese (Myanmar) 
border being captured by Myanmar border guards are a cause for 
concern. Villagers from the other side stray into India and vice 
versa in the course of their daily search for food ~ these are 
frequent occurrences, given the porous border and ethnic affinity of 
tribes living on either side of the divide. But while there are 
rarely reports about Indian border guards capturing Myanmarese 
citizens moving into the country, authorities on the Myanmar side 
frequently catch and hold Indians near the border. They are often 
detained at undisclosed locations, at times indefinitely. And most 
cases do not get reported in the metro media. 
The latest incident occurred on 6 May 2006. On that day, 21 villagers 
living in border villages in Singngat sub-division of Manipur's 
Churachandpur district were caught by the Myanmar army while they 
were collecting forest produce in the jungles straddling the border. 
The villagers were from 11 villages ~ Muallum, Kailam, Belpuan, 
Haijang, Sumchinvum, Singngat, Tangpijawl, Lunjang, Tomei, Bualkot 
and Suangphu ~ all of which fall under the jurisdiction of Singngat 
sub-division. 
They included a six-year-old child, who had accompanied his father to 
the forest, and a 16-year old high school student on his summer 
vacation. None of them have been released till the time of writing. 
Their whereabouts and the charges placed against them, if any, are 
unknown. The three trucks in which they were travelling were also 
seized. 
What has made the incident all the more painful has been the lack of 
response from authorities from both sides. Barring stray comments on 
the Internet by those who happen to learn about the incident, nothing 
was reported of it in the media till 11 June when a columnist in a 
Manipur newspaper wrote about it. Another newspaper followed it up 
with a detailed report two weeks later. Only then did concerned 
officials start making some noise and show some concern. 
Indian authorities, including the Army and Assam Rifles, which are 
manning the Indian border, now claim that there was no intimation of 
the arrests from Myanmar officials. The deputy commissioner of 
Churachandpur district, the district's top bureaucrat, AK Sinha, said 
that he had received information about the incident and had passed it 
on to the home department. 
It now transpires that a suo moto case on the incident had indeed 
been filed in the Singngat Police Station on 24 May, not less than 18 
days after the incident! Unconfirmed reports have said that the 21 
persons were held at a military detention centre at Tonjang township 
in Myanmar. The reports also said that no food was provided to them 
by the Myanmar authorities and that local traders who used them for 
wood cutting and transport were asked to bring food to the captured 
people regularly, events which foreign diplomats say is commonplace 
in the country where forced porterage, involving the use and 
exploitation of villagers for army projects such as road construction 
with little or no pay or compensation of any kind, has been 
extensively documented by human rights groups including the United 
Nations High Commission for Refugees. 
Meanwhile, the Zomi Human Rights Foundation (ZHRF), an independent 
rights group, has said that it had submitted a memorandum to one of 
the state's two members of Parliament, Mani Charenemai. Apart from 
him, no one appeared to be bothered. The callous attitude of the 
government towards its citizens held captive by a foreign government 
can only aggravate the strong feelings of alienation in the isolated 
and poor border villages. 
This is not the first time that such an incident has taken place. 
Only last year, five men from the same area were arrested on the same 
charge by the Myanmarese army. They were subsequently released, but 
only after the Indian government took up the matter with its 
counterpart. But the truck on which they were riding was never 
returned. 
It is pertinent to note that the people living on both sides of the 
border speak the same language, and share the same culture and 
religion. They belonged to the Kuki-Chin and Mizo group of tribes 
scattered across North-east India, Myanmar and Bangladesh, also known 
in some areas as the Zomi. Indeed there is even a militant group, the 
Zomi Revolutionary Organisation (ZRO), which operates on either side 
of the border. There are representatives of other active opposition 
and insurgent fronts from Myanmar who are located in Manipur and 
Mizoram.
The fact that the international border is not clearly marked does not 
help although there is a provision in the treaty which governs the 
border area: this enables traders and members of local communities to 
travel 25 km into the other's territory for purposes of trade. In 
addition, another crucial source of sustenance for the impoverished 
people here is the collection and sale of forest produce. Thus, 
despite existing laws, it is only natural that people will continue 
to cross the border, whatever risk it may entail because it is a 
question of survival, of filling their stomachs and providing for 
their families. 
The latest incident only underlines that in a situation of non-
governance, poverty and institutionalised neglect, such rules can be 
bent at will by authorities who are not accountable. 

(The author is a freelance journalist from Manipur based in New Delhi









Reply via email to