http://www.tehelka.com/story_main37.asp?filename=Ne090208rhino_killings.\
asp
<http://www.tehelka.com/story_main37.asp?filename=Ne090208rhino_killings\
.asp>

Rhino          Killings: The Inside Story

A former poacher          in Kaziranga reveals why the animal is being
increasingly hunted

TERESA REHMAN
Kaziranga, Assam
                              UB Photos
A RARE SUCCESS story          in India’s wildlife conservation
record, Assam’s Kaziranga National Park,          home to the
one-horned Asiatic Rhinoceros and a UNESCO World Heritage          Site,
is struggling to come to grips with a spurt in rhino killings. Twenty
rhinos were poached last year, 14 of them inside the national park and
the rest in areas just outside the sanctuary. The forest department has
come up with the usual excuses of being understaffed and under-equipped,
but the retrenchment of casual workers in the park by the previous
Prafulla          Kumar Mahanta regime, leaving scores without
livelihood and angry at the          government apathy, has also played
its damaging part.

One of those dismissed          workers was Golap Patgiri. Employed
informally by the forest department          since 10 years,
Patgiri’s monthly earnings of Rs 1,500 suddenly ran dry.
“We used to do everything, from patrolling to cutting grass. We
assisted          the permanent staff in almost everything. I had once
caught a poacher          red-handed,” he says. Suddenly jobless,
Patgiri found himself under pressure          to join the ranks of the
very people he had once battled: the poachers.
GROWING THREAT

25 RHINOS
Killed in Assam in the past 13 months, 20 in             Kaziranga

81 RHINOS
Died of natural causes in the same period

$35,000
The price of a rhino horn in the
international market, mainly in China,           where it’s
considered an aphrodisiac
“All of a sudden we          had nothing to do and there was a
family to look after. It was difficult          to go back to our
village and begin farming. As it is our village is ravaged          by
annual floods and the crops are destroyed by stray rhinos and
buffalos,”          rues Patgiri. Despite belonging to one of the
village’s affluent families,          nobody was ready to engage
him even as a daily wage labourer. “People          used to ask
us instead if we had a job for them,” he says.

On the fringes of          the 900-sq km sanctuary is a small hamlet
known as “Shikari Gaon”. Infamous          as a breeding
ground of poachers till not long ago, the village is now          home
to many surrendered poachers, some of whom work as informers for
the forest department. Patgiri is one such “reformed”
outlaw, and besides          helping forest officials with information,
he works as an activist for          a local NGO named “Dagrob
�" Eco-tourism and Eco-development Society”.          The
Wildlife Trust of India has promised to help him set up a shop. Dagrob
means the “rising sun” and Patgiri and his fellow
villagers are keen to          make a new beginning. One of
Dagrob’s main activities is creating awareness          against
poaching. Another is a campaign for economic empowerment of women
through building a cottage weaving industry. The NGO North East Social
Trust is assisting Dagrob in this endeavour.

Patgiri has one case          of poaching still pending against him, and
he has to face the wrath of          forest department officials
whenever a poaching incident takes place.          In Dhoba Ati
Beloguri, Patgiri’s native village, his elder brother Holiram
Patgiri, a former CPI-ML activist, joins us. Pointing to his thatched
house, he laughs, “Can you believe it? We are just about 3 km
from Bokakhat          town, yet we have no electricity or water supply.
The only saving grace          is a primary school with a single teacher
who caters to 115 students.”

How did his village,          inhabited by people from the Mishing
tribe, come to acquire the infamous          epithet Shikari Gaon?
Holiram says that the government used to grant gun          licences to
villagers living close to the forest to protect themselves          from
wild animals. The villagers were later asked to surrender the guns
when militancy broke out in the region.

MANY OF the villagers          had single and double barrel rifles. In
fact, owning land, elephants,          buffalo and a gun were status
symbols in our villages,” Holiram          says. “Most of
our men were ace hunters and hunting a pig or a hare          was
considered sacred during the festivals. But the rhino was never our
target.”

Holiram says many          of the poor villagers were lured into
assisting the poachers who came          from Nagaland, Manipur,
Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram. “These poachers          came with
sophisticated weapons but could not operate without a guide          who
knew the ins and outs of the forest,” he says.

There was a time when          15 such local “poachers”
had surrendered and the forest department had          promised to pay
them Rs 500 per month. Explains wildlife activist Uttam          Saikia,
who is also the honorary wildlife warden of Golaghat district,
“But gradually the payment stopped and the officers stopped
bothering.          There should be proper rehabilitation packages for
the reformed poachers          like they have for the surrendered
militants in Assam.”

An angry Holiram says          the forest department’s claim of
being short-staffed is a lie. “If          they are understaffed,
why did they fire those casual workers? Our boys          grew up among
the wild animals in the forest. They can be much better          guards.
Most of the present guards are so old they can barely hear or
see,” he says.

Wildlife expert Bibabh          Talukdar says community participation is
imperative for dealing with poaching.          “The government
should accord the highest priority to strengthening
intelligence. The illegal wildlife trade in Kaziranga is the second
highest          in the country in terms of volume. If for Rs 10,000 the
villagers are          helping the poachers the government should pay
them Rs 20,000 to help          nab the poachers,” he says.

Talukdar points out          that between 1998 and 2006, rhino poaching
in Kaziranga was controlled          effectively, with an average loss
of only about 4-8 rhinos per year. Better          conservation efforts
during these years had led to an increase in the          rhino
population from about 1,550 in 1999 to 1,850 in 2006. But the gains
seem to be fast getting eroded given the spate of killings last year.

WRITER’S          E-MAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.tehelka.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



>From          Tehelka Magazine, Vol 5, Issue 5, Dated Feb 09, 2008

Reply via email to