Hi, I totally agree and respect people's view on any topic.
But when I reply to the group against any mail sent to group.. I expect the same kind of communication over the group itself.. its a simple process and professional. So, I surprised when received reply on my personal mail ID. Also.. yes.. I had forwarded that personal mail to others who are also frustrated seeing such new splitting idea. My humble request to all the party is to stop such dialogue immediately and not to initiate such in near future. To do this, Moderator can play a very very significant role. Thanks and regards Mrinal Singh Raja ________________________________ From: deka7kl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: assamonline@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, 4 December, 2008 1:17:53 PM Subject: [asom] Critic - split-signal from assamonline moderators Moderators kindly take care not to create split-signal! Split-Signal Example: Assamonline moderator had forwarded an email to me that Mrinal Raja wrote in response to my posting see - http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/assamonlin e/message/ 4656 I replied to Mrinal Raja in person and my impression was that moderator had closed the thread, but moderator's re-posting the same (see above link) generated some confusion. Especially Mrinal Raja forwarded my personally addressed message to a person (Dravidian Ahom) who mingled in the past with people who talked homosexual stuff. My definition of "Ahom" is professionally intelligible! If you want Kamrupi to equate to Ahom make sure to get proportional number of Kamrupi exhibiting weird like - "homosexual stuff", or "forwarding personally addressed email", or parametric, or loop-effect, etc … Otherwise correct "Ahom" study "Ahom" problem! Don't we have enough from Ahom leaders (both Dravidian and Mongoloid)? I believe moderators would give me a chance to reply Mrinal Raja's email http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/assamonlin e/message/ 4656 Be the first one to try the new Messenger 9 Beta! Go to http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/win/
