Using Geographical Indications theory, Ahom - of or related to Ahom
kingdom.

<:
This crab mentality of dividing Assam on some stupid ethnic lines is
absurd. - Siddhartha KATAKI
:>

This argument is flawed!

Kamrupi ethnic roots are exotic/unprecedented - look at Kamrupi equation
their exotic ways include Baro Rabha Saranya (all Mongoloid Kamrupi),
then Vedic line of Brahmanya, Saranya, and so on. - here Saranya is
Kamrupi word Ahom distorted to Saraniya

Kamrupi ethinc roots are not any kind of "stupid ethnic lines" nor
"absurd".

Critical Thinking:

Ahom-admin tactics ought to be reviewed/changed.

(a) Baptist Mission Society experts included phenomenal Kamrupi grammar
(present perfect usage) to publish several issues of very first Arundoi,
but then that time local Ahom forced omitting any Kamrupi grammar

(b) they are Ahom-admin of Assam gov enlisting illegal immigrants as
Assamese speakers in greater Kamrupi land who repeatedly abused Indian
Constitution

(c) Ahom-admin has not learned from what it had done to Baro (Mongoloid
Kamrupi) in greater Kamrupi land (I have a collection of old European
doc it says "Khamroof Baro" and in that doc it said "Bisni" present
Bijni was ruled by "Bhoutia")

Don't the 3 items above show Ahom-admin possessing same Ahom-vision
since 1826 to date?

While European traveler documented "Khamroof Baro" with Geographical
Indications, why on Earth Assamese (Ahomese) historian failed to cite
this information in their printed history book?

One can be a proud Assamese by keeping exotic Kamrupi ethnic roots, and
this is the way should be united Assamese. I wished Hagram would have
extended borders to include whole "Khamroof" to autonomy.


--- "Siddhartha KATAKI" <siddhartha.kat...@...> wrote:

Dear All-

Can we not stand up and speak in unision that we are Assamese and proud
to be so. This crab mentality of dividing Assam on some stupid ethnic
lines is absurd.


Reply via email to