First time I saw this was in 1968 in some 'n'-inches thick stack
of fan-fold paper. It saved thousands of trees, millions of $$$ on
paper, ribbons and computer time from the IBM 1401 1960's to
the day a SYSUDUMP became too big to print and carry o one's
desk. Today it's mostly in the way and I second the motion, it could,
it SHOULD be an option (minimum number of *equal* bytes).
Andreas F. Geissbuehler
AFG Consultants Inc.
http://www.afgc-inc.com/
"robin" <robin51...> blasts:
Why not?, I wonder. Obviously not much thought went into
the design of that program
From: "Hall, Keven" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, 8 October 2010 5:46 AM
One of my pet peeves is when IPCS (for example) does this:
0000 40404040 40404040 40404040 00000000 | |
0010 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 |................|
0020 Next X'0010' bytes same as above
0030 00000000 40404040 40404040 40404040 |.... |
Why not just display the [expletive elided] data?
