The program will only be run when there are changes to DBDs so it
won't be more than a few times a month. Even though it was nice to
have a bit of BPAM practice in assembler I can see that this sort of
thing would be far better written in REXX. One problem I have is that
I don't know REXX, something I would rather like to remedy. Can anyone
recommend a book on REXX in the z/OS environment ?

Thanks,

Bye for now,
John.



On 1 October 2010 16:39, McKown, John <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
>> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 8:56 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Sample code to read a PDS member using BPAM
>>
>> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:37:48 -0400, Steve Smith wrote:
>> >>
>> >I don't think all that dynamic allocation would be simpler than using
>> >BPAM.
>>
>> It would if you use BPXWDYN.
>>
>> --
>> Tom Marchant
>
> BPAM would be far more efficient in CPU and I/O. So it is ease of coding vs. 
> cost of running analysis. If this is run 100s of times a day, then I'd go 
> with BPAM. If it is run once a month, who cares? But it seems silly, to me, 
> to design HLASM code in a CPU inefficient way. If CPU doesn't matter, use 
> REXX. Or a UNIX shell script.
>
> --
> John McKown
> Systems Engineer IV
> IT
>
> Administrative Services Group
>
> HealthMarkets(r)
>
> 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
> (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-691-6183 cell
> [email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
> proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
> message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and 
> issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake 
> Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of 
> TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM
>

Reply via email to