On Dec 3, 2010, at 16:02, Edward Jaffe wrote: > > This restriction results in field placement favoritism. The fields to which > access via an SS instruction is expected will tend to be placed within +4K of > the control block or work area whereas fields used by shorter instructions > would > tend to be placed elsewhere. For the programs I'm researching, a cursory > examination seems to suggest that rearranging the fields could result in > *none* > of the SS instructions needing to be reworked. One can only hope... > Yow! And if you reassemble the entire system you needn't worry about compatibility.
-- gil
