No C compilers here. There was one for a short time at work, but it was killed by a manager who went on a cost saving spree to try to save his job. We lost a lot of software. He still lost his job. I'd go for the Dignus compiler on my home system to cross compile, but I don't think it's legal to download the z/OS header files to my home machine. And I've not got much "excess" money right now due to a bad illness draining my accounts.
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:03 -0400, Justin R. Bendich wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:10:43 -0500, McKown, John > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Also, I consider using the C subroutine library to be "cheating" <grin>. > >I use the BPX... calls. Of course, wiser heads really would use the C > >library simply because it would be faster and more efficient. And, in > >reality, I likely would too if I went to the bother of writing much code. > > Do you have a C(++) compiler? > They are really nice. If there's something a run-time library doesn't > have, you can always write assembler for little system-related functions. > I would write everything in C++ if i could. When i was working at my > former company, i wrote a major DB2 function in C++ and it beat IBM, > performance-wise. > > I don't think it's "cheating" at all. > Try Dignus's compilers. They're quite snazzy. Not the most-efficient > code, maybe, but the output is easy to diagnose when something goes > wrong. > > Justin R. Bendich > Mainframe Coder > > >-- > >John McKown > >Systems Engineer IV > >IT > > > >Administrative Services Group > > > >HealthMarkets(r) > > > >9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 > >(817) 255-3225 phone * > >[email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com -- John McKown Maranatha! <><
