I agree that the typos are inexcusable.  I'll try to do better in the future.

--jg

On 1/6/12, Steve Comstock <[email protected]> wrote:
> What's with the typos, John? That's not like you.
>
> On 1/6/2012 7:55 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
>> This caption, at least when it is interpreted in accordance with the
>> semantics of rteceived standard English, would ordinarily provoke a
>                 ~~
>> simple response.
>>
>> The content of 'an address that point to a struct', i.e., a pointer,
>> is the value of that pointer.  zArchitecture Pointer values are then
>> traditionally and appropriately externalized as strings of eight or 16
>> hexadecimal digits; and this rersponse exhausts the topic.
>>
>> The question how to externalize the values contained in 'a struct' is
>> a different one.  To make sense of such a question one must specify a
>> template/mapping mechanism, an HLASM DSECT or DSECTs, a C struct, a
>> PL/I structure, whatever.    Storage itself is susceptible of multiple
>> interpetations.  A doubleword aligned sequence of eight bytes may be
>> an [AD] address, a double-precision BFP|DFP|HFP value, etc., etc.
>>
>> Since the [barbarous] term 'struct' is used here, reference to a C or
>> C-like entity is presumably intended, and there are cxonventions for
>                                                        ~~~
>> displaying the values of the elements of such a struct.
>>
>> Why all the pother?
>                ~
>>
>> John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Steve Comstock
> The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
>
> 303-355-2752
> http://www.trainersfriend.com
>
> * To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment!
>    + Training your people is an excellent investment
>
> * Try our tool for calculating your Return On Investment
>      for training dollars at
>    http://www.trainersfriend.com/ROI/roi.html
>


--
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA

Reply via email to