> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:32 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: How bad is the EX instruction?
>
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 08:21, Kerry wrote:
> >
> > Performance is one of the strongest reasons for coding in
> assembler and
> > this discussion characterizes some of the low hanging fruit
> available for
> > the attainment thereof.
> >
> Others have said here that performance is a strong reason
> for _not_ coding in assembler:
>
> o Compiler developers have done the research on instruction
>   timings and know better than most end users what sequences
>   fit the pipelines optimally.
>
> o Compiled code can be re-optimized for a new generation of
>   hardware simply by recompiling.
>
> o Interpreters can dynamically recompile based on statistical
>   profiles evaluated at the actual time of execution.
>
> -- gil

My usual "whine". I would likely abandon HLASM for the most part. IF I had a C 
license. But, one makes due with what one has.

--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets(r)

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
[email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The 
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM

Reply via email to