On 2/10/2012 7:40 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
Yes, indeed. I should have proofed my post. Still, the substance of
what I wanted to say is not much affected by the fact that 'SR' should
have been 'SM'.
Or maybe 'STM' :-)
On 2/10/12, John P Kalinich<jkali...@csc.com> wrote:
John Gilmore of the IBM Mainframe Assembler List
<ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu> wrote on 02/10/2012 07:52:18 AM:
Comments are or, better, should be of two sorts:
1) Substantial prefixed blocks of text, often several hundred lines of
them, that describe what will be done and how it will be done, and
explicate coding conventions for parameters, and
2) comments following single instructions, 'remarks'.
A comment like 'store registers' attached to an SR instruction is worse
than useless.
Agree, since SR is 'subtract' not 'store'.
Regards,
John K
--
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-355-2752
http://www.trainersfriend.com
* To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment!
+ Training your people is an excellent investment
* Try our tool for calculating your Return On Investment
for training dollars at
http://www.trainersfriend.com/ROI/roi.html
