On Apr 16, 2012, at 06:17, McKown, John wrote: > I was writing on my tablet at home when I posted that. The "strangeness" is > that although it looks like a GLBA, and the value is "incremented" if used by > a nested macro, the value within a given invocation of a macro is > "unchanging", unless specifically set by code in the macro. > Sounds like an excellent, very proctical design; hardly "strange". This is akin to the behavior of keyword parameters to a macro which are not (I hope -- I haven't tried it; does the manual make it clear?) changed by a nested call to a macro with similarly named parameters.
-- gil
