Yeah, I had seen the PLO opcode, and never thought of the PLO organization, but then that's really old news. The other opcodes I missed also, but much funnier. --- On Wed, 5/30/12, Automatic digest processor <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Automatic digest processor <[email protected]> Subject: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 29 May 2012 to 30 May 2012 (#2012-96) To: "Recipients of ASSEMBLER-LIST digests" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012, 11:06 PM ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 29 May 2012 to 30 May 2012 (#2012-96) Table of contents: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 28 May 2012 to 29 May 2012 (#2012-95) (4) inappropriate of an opcode ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 28 May 2012 to 29 May 2012 (#2012-95) Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 28 May 2012 to 29 May 2012 (#2012-95) (05/30) From: John Walker <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 28 May 2012 to 29 May 2012 (#2012-95) (05/30) From: "McKown, John" <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 28 May 2012 to 29 May 2012 (#2012-95) (05/30) From: John Gilmore <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 28 May 2012 to 29 May 2012 (#2012-95) (05/30) From: Scott Ford <[email protected]> inappropriate of an opcode inappropriate of an opcode (05/30) From: Martin Truebner <[email protected]> Browse the ASSEMBLER-LIST online archives.
