On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:01:05 -0400, John Gilmore wrote: >Unbased is better by a wide margin than baseless. > >I should still, however, prefer a non-negative form.
I don't have an entirely satisfactory suggestion, but I sometimes refer to it as "Relative code". IMO, Unbased suffers from the same problem as Baseless, that it is inaccurate. Base registers are still needed for data. Relative addressing removes the requirement for most code. -- Tom Marchant
