Over the decades, I too have complained of the triumph of development over
design in various human creations.  I have come to understand that even
the best designs grow old and cannot be adapted to new challenges, much as
is true of myself.

I taught myself assembler about 4.5 decades ago and have used it on three
different architectures.  Hlasm and its predecessors have served me well
in the interim.  I am thankful for those who created it and for those who
keep it in existence.  While there are preprocessors and program
generators lurking in many corners, I know of no other language that has a
powerful, built-in tool as the HLASM macro language.  I have enjoyed using
it to enhance my own and others productivity, and to build, grow and
repair software solutions in a number of industries.

Ad multos annos!

IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> wrote on
08/07/2012 03:13:25 AM:

> The pity is there's so little evidence of specification or
> design of HLASM.  It jes' growed.  A dreadful example is that
> divide checks evaluating arithmetic expressions are not reported
> as errors.  And I have an example where base and displacement
> are successfully evaluated in an R[SX] instruction where an
> S-constant with the same argument in apparently the same context
> causes an error.


-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this communication (including any
attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the
personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom
it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying,
or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original
message. Thank you

Reply via email to