IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> wrote on 08/24/2012 03:12:35 PM:
> From: Martin Truebner <[email protected]> > > Frank, > > as Randy already said > > CLI 0(R3),0 > JNE NOT_ZERO > > or > > TM 0(R3),X'FF' > JNZ NOT_ZERO > > will do without forceing the reader to go to POP and find out what you > ment (and I would for certain use one of the new instructions, if I can > replace two against one (or better)). just yesterday, in "new code" (a clone of a very old piece of application code being made for a single customer), I coded LLILF R15,17+X'40000000' *set length and pad character MVCL R0,R14 and I wondered if I was being overly cute. I haven't decided yet but it is something I am going to have to answer for myself. This code no longer has a real "owner", just programmers hacking on it. (pun intended) What is the consensus of the group? ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this communication (including any attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Thank you
