On 11/6/2012 7:01 AM, Chuck Arney wrote:
I'm sure there are a number of tool providers that would like to take advantage of smaller formats of ADATA. Each provider could roll their own, but a standard published format would of course be more desirable for the good of both provider and user. The ADATA format is published exactly for this reason. Why not the ASMLANGX format?
I think this is a very sensible suggestion. How about making it a SHARE requirement? -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 310-338-0400 x318 [email protected] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
