On Nov 7, 2012, at 08:21, McKown, John wrote: > I know where our "love" of putting sequence numbers in columns 73-80 comes > from. But the only thing that I know of that continues to really use them is > IEBUPDTE. ... > > So, other than being "non main stream" and even "obsessively weird", is there > any *technical* reason to maintain sequence numbers? > Some of our anti-"obsessively weird" developers have insisted that it makes it easier to cite passages in code reviews. Their numbers are dwindling as we too use a UNIX-based source control system. But get Shmuel's opinion.
-- gil
